InvestWithAlex.com 

As NATO Expands, Russia Is Ready To Respond

As the situation in Ukraine continues to deteriorate, in a televised Q&A session Putin has warned that any NATO expansion attempt will be met with force.  His statement came in direct response to NATO’s Secretary General Rasmussen. 

NATO’s Rasmussen pledged on Wednesday to step up patrols and boost its military presence along the alliance’s eastern border in Europe, citing Russia’s alleged involvement in the Ukrainian crisis. “We will have more planes in the air, more ships on the water, and more readiness on the land,” Rasmussen said in Brussels.

Putin On Ukraine. 

“Have they lost their minds!?” said Putin during his annual question and answer session. “They are deploying tanks, armored vehicles and weaponry! Against whom?! Are they nuts?!”

The bottom line is as follows. For as long as the USA/NATO continue to play in Russia’s backyard things will continue to escalate. Putin will have no choice but to go into Ukraine to regain control. The real question here has nothing to do with Ukraine and everything to do with why the US and NATO are hell bent on pushing Russia in such a fashion over a small nation 6,000 miles away from an American shore. With the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan now over, does the US Industrial Military Complex need another enemy? I think you know the answer to that. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

As NATO Expands, Russia Is Ready To Respond Google

RT Writes: Putin on Kiev op: ‘Tanks, jets against own people?! Are they nuts?!

 

Activists block a collumn of Ukrainian men riding on Armoured Personnel Carriers in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk on April 16, 2014 (AFP Photo / Anatoly Stepanov)

Activists block a collumn of Ukrainian men riding on Armoured Personnel Carriers in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk on April 16, 2014 (AFP Photo / Anatoly Stepanov)

 

Putin has criticized Ukraine’s coup-appointed government for using tanks and jets against its own people, during a live Q&A session. Branding Kiev’s approach as a “crime,” Putin said they must open dialogue with eastern Ukraine.

“Have they lost their minds!?” said Putin during his annual question and answer session. “They are deploying tanks, armored vehicles and weaponry! Against whom?! Are they nuts?!”

The Russian president said he thought that asking activists in the southeast of Ukraine to hand in their weapons was the right approach, but this measure should also be applied to armed Ukrainian nationalist groups. 

Putin went on to say the crisis in Ukraine can only be solved through a compromise in the interests of the Ukrainian people. 

“The coup-appointed government in Kiev needs to come to its senses before we can negotiate,” said Putin. 

In spite of the fact the interim government is illegitimate, Russia is still prepared to open dialogue with them, said Putin. Ukraine’s interim government came to power on February 22 after weeks of violent protests on Kiev’s Independence Square. They ousted President Viktor Yanukovich and declared elections in May, something that violates the Ukrainian constitution.

NATO’s reinforcement of its presence in eastern Europe was also touched upon during Putin’s Q&A session. Head of Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya, Dmitry Kiselev, said that he felt like NATO was “suffocating him” and described the organization as “a cancerous tumor.”

Dmitry Kiselev was included in the list of Russian politicians who were hit by Western sanctions following the Crimean referendum that led to the region’s integration with Russia.

In a tongue-in-cheek response, Putin told Kiselev not to be afraid of NATO, assuring him that “Russia would suffocate everyone else.”

NATO has accused Russia of attempting to destabilize Ukraine, something that Russia categorically denied. Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov told the press on Monday that Russia had no interest in promoting crisis in Ukraine, and the West needs to produce evidence to support its accusations.

Stock Market Update. April 16th, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com

daily chart April 16 2014

Another up day with the Dow Jones up 162 points (+1.00%) and the Nasdaq up 52 points (+1.29%) 

With a bear market now in the distant past of approximately 8.5 trading hours  😀 , the bulls are eager to buy. Financial media talking heads and market pundits are coming out of the woodwork, proclaiming a market bottom and the push towards the next high. In short, the correction is over and the bull is back. Not so fast there, sparky. This is what we told our subscribers in our weekly update last Saturday….

Case For A Strong Bounce: On Friday(4/112014), the Dow bottomed dead on one of our mathematical points of force. It’s not a particularly strong point of force, but it would work for a short-term bounce. Further, on Friday the Dow bottomed at a fairly strong resistance point located at around 16,000-16,050. Further, on Friday the Nasdaq bottomed at its February 5th intermediary low, without being able to break it. Finally, most indices are oversold and are due for some sort of a bounce.    

While everyone is cheering for the bull market, our mathematical and timing work continues to show an upcoming bear market in equities. When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last two years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when this bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please Click Here.  

 (***Please Note: Due to my obligations to my Subscribers I am unable to provide you with more exact forecasts. In fact, I am being “Wishy Washy” at best with my FREE daily updates here. If you would be interested in exact forecasts, dates, times and precise daily coverage, please Click Here). 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Stock Market Update. April 16th, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com  Google

Baltic Dry Collapses 40%. Signals Economic Slowdown.

baltic dry index is breaking down

No, Baltic Dry is not a tasty Swedish Beer.  Baltic Dry Index, a measure of sea freight prices, is now in a technical bear market.  Signaling a worldwide economic slowdown. Down 40% in just three weeks and a bone crushing 58% since it’s December 2013 top. This works well with our overall bear market of 2014-2017 forecast. But don’t worry, as mentioned earlier, according to the talking heads on TV the market has bottomed and the Nasdaq is going to 5,000. BUY, BUY, BUY. Cheers. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Baltic Dry Collapses 40%. Signals Economic Slowdown.  Google

 

Bloomberg: Labor Shortage Forces Employers To Fight Over Employees. Salaries To Surge?

Nice fluff piece Bloomberg. I am not sure who paid for it, the FED or the America Is The Best Country In The World propaganda group. 

Companies across the U.S. from Texas to Virginia and Nebraska are struggling to fill positions with metropolitan jobless rates below the 5.2 percent to 5.6 percent level the Federal Reserve regards as full employment nationally. Competition for workers is prompting businesses to raise wages, increase hours for current employees, add benefits and recruit from other regions.

Give me a f&#*ing break Bloomberg. If you believe their reporting is anchored in reality, give me a call, I have some Pets.com and Nortell stock to sell you. If you want a better look at the employment/unemployment situation, here are a few links worth checking out. 

happy workers investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Bloomberg: Labor Shortage Forces Employers To Fight Over Employees. Salaries To Surge?  Google

Bloomberg Writes: Tight Job Market in U.S. Cities Prompts Higher Pay

To hire 10 to 15 project coordinators this year, Sabre Commercial Inc. has boosted pay 10 percent and added a 401(k) retirement plan.

“It is an employee’s market,” said John Cyrier, co-founder and president of the 48-employee Austin, Texas-based builder. “We are definitely seeing a labor shortage in Austin and central Texas. I see it only getting worse.”

More from Bloomberg.com: Toyota Responds to Hyundai’s Sonata With Refreshed Camry

Companies across the U.S. from Texas to Virginia and Nebraska are struggling to fill positions with metropolitan jobless rates below the 5.2 percent to 5.6 percent level the Federal Reserve regards as full employment nationally. Competition for workers is prompting businesses to raise wages, increase hours for current employees, add benefits and recruit from other regions.

“There are spot labor shortages” that probably will “broaden out over the next year as the job market steadily improves,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics Inc. in West Chester, Pennsylvania.

More from Bloomberg.com: S. Korea Says 284 Missing After Ferry Sinks

Unemployment in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos was 4.8 percent in February, Labor Department figures show. Forty-nine, or 13 percent, of the 372 metro areas reported jobless rates below 5 percent that month, the most for February since 2008, two months after the start of the recession. The lowest was 2.8 percent in Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, Louisiana, because of offshore-oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico.

Four years ago, during the worst of the labor-market slump, just two cities had rates below 5 percent.

More from Bloomberg.com: Chinese Thunder God Herb Works as Well as Pain Therapy

Wage Pressure

“That says the economy is getting better in a lot of places,” said David Wiczer, labor-market economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. While national unemployment is a closely watched indicator, “it is difficult to average things. This does have implication for wage pressure at the local level.”

The Fed’s Beige Book review of regional economic conditions has highlighted the pinch. Labor markets in the Minneapolis Fed district have tightened, with “strong demand for welders and health-care workers, such as certified nursing assistants,” and earnings at “high levels in the oil-drilling areas of North Dakota and Montana,” the Fed reported March 5. The next review is due today.

Compensation has risen about 2 percent nationally so far this year and probably will increase by 2.2 percent next year, 2.5 percent in two years and 3 percent by late 2016, Zandi estimates.

“The national economy will return to full employment one metro area at a time,” he said.

Benchmark Rate

As incomes edge higher and labor markets tighten, the Fed may raise its benchmark interest rate more than policy makers have projected, said Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank Securities in New York and the top unemployment forecaster for the past two years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The FOMC has held its federal funds rate on overnight loans among banks near zero since December 2008 and has predicted the rate will be 1 percent at the end of 2015 and 2.25 percent at year-end 2016. LaVorgna estimates it will be 1.5 percent in December 2015 and 3.5 percent a year later.

Regional demand will have the greatest impact on paychecks for the lowest-wage jobs, such as fast-food, because people aren’t likely to relocate for these positions, said Gary Burtless, an economist in Washington at the Brookings Institution who was previously at the U.S. Labor Department.

‘Geographic Mismatch’

“Tightening local markets while the national market remains weak would reflect some geographic mismatch, in which demand is rising in some localities while the supply — unemployed workers — are concentrated elsewhere,” said Harry Holzer, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University in Washington and former chief Labor Department economist.

While some people will move for good-paying careers over time, migration can be limited by poor information about opportunities, houses with mortgages more than the value of the properties and an aging population, Holzer said.

The number of positions waiting to be filled climbed by 299,000 to 4.17 million in February, the most since January 2008, the Labor Department reported April 8. The figure is among the job-market barometers Fed Chair Janet Yellen tracks.

In New Orleans, where unemployment is 4.2 percent, “we are getting killed on overtime,” said Ti Martin, co-owner of Commander’s Palace, SoBou and Café Adelaide, which employ a total of more than 350 people. “We are doubling up and working extra hours,” and managers are filing in as cooks. The restaurants have a dozen or more openings, mainly for experienced chefs and servers, she said.

Needed Staff

Martin is leading an effort among proprietors to start a nonprofit culinary institute in the city to train needed kitchen staff.

In Omaha, with a 4.5 percent unemployment rate, the Greater Omaha Chamber is coordinating a program that will increase the number of internships to more than 300 this year from 135 in 2012 at employers including Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., Union Pacific Corp. (UNP) and ConAgra Foods Inc. (CAG) Exposing young people to the city has been an “excellent recruitment tool,” said Sarah A. Johnson, director of talent and workforce initiatives for the chamber.

A tight market “is literally our reality,” said Omaha Steaks International Inc. spokeswoman Beth Weiss. The food seller hired more than 3,000 people for seasonal jobs during the holidays and uses cash bonuses and employee discounts to try to attract workers.

Five-Year Low

The jobless rate in the Washington metro area, which includes the Virginia cities of Alexandria and Arlington, was 5.1 percent in February, near a five-year low, which means some professional jobs have gone begging.

“The competition for people is really fierce right now,” said Gar Muse, principal with Cooper Carry, an architectural firm that has increased staff to 50 in Alexandria from 40 in 2010 and plans to hire more. Cooper Carry boosted its advertising to seven print and online outlets this year from a single posting and uses social media to promote job openings.

The company also has had to work to keep existing staff. “We have lost a handful of people,” Muse said. “They are constantly being approached and we have had to make some counteroffers.”

Social-media sites are playing a bigger role in scouting talent. Some 77 percent of employers used networking websites to recruit potential job candidates last year, up from 56 percent in 2011, according a 2013 study by the Society for Human Resource Management, an Alexandria-based trade group representing human-resource professionals.

Worsening Shortage

The labor shortage is expected to worsen in some regions. In Houston and the surrounding area, construction for the oil, gas and petrochemical industries on the Gulf Coast will require about 36,000 more workers in 2016 than in 2013, according to Industrial Info Resources Inc., a Houston-area based research company.

Even with hot labor markets in some cities, twenty-nine metro areas still have unemployment rates of at least the October 2009 post-recession peak of 10 percent, including Atlantic City, New Jersey, and Fresno, California.

The national picture is “generally consistent with a slowly improving” job market that is “still far from complete health,” said Rob Valletta, research adviser at the San Francisco Fed, whose work has been cited by Yellen.

Moreover, some economists believe the decline in joblessness — which was 6.7 percent in March and has fallen faster than Fed policy makers predicted — is sending a misleading signal about the health of the economy.

More Slack

“The labor market actually has a fair bit more slack than would be indicated by the national unemployment rate,” said Jesse Rothstein, a former chief economist at the Labor Department who now teaches at the University of California at Berkeley. “If you believe that, then the same problem has to hold in local labor markets as well.”

Employers in Austin say they don’t see evidence of slack, such as discouraged workers waiting for more opportunities to start looking for jobs.

“There is a stronger economy and a lot of growth in the tech sector,” said Jason Schenker, president of Prestige Economics LLC, an Austin-based economic research company. “Construction is booming. There is some migration of people for jobs, which has a multiplier effect creating more jobs.”

The city was “relatively resilient” during the 18-month recession that ended in June 2009, in part because it is the state capital and home of the University of Texas, he said.

Talent War

“It is definitely a war for regional talent,” said Sherri Manning, vice president at Q2 Holdings Inc. (QTWO), an Austin company with 446 people that provides technology for online and mobile banking.

Q2 Holdings, which hires 70 percent of its staff from Texas, provides cash bonuses to employees for referrals and holds recruiting events with pizza at pinball arcades. Last year, it started a 90-day training program to teach needed skills to people with a technical inclination — such as a math or science degree — though no formal experience. Those who do well are hired, Manning said.

Shortages exist in Austin for construction workers in trades including installing drywall and painting, Sabre Commercial’s Cyrier said. His company, which began boosting wages in 2011, directly employs project coordinators, while contracting out most other tasks. Subcontracting costs have gone up 15 percent or more in the past three years, he said.

He has sought to create a more collegial environment to attract younger workers. One example: stressing more communication, including daily huddles among staff about project issues. Making sure the company is viewed as a good place to work is important because it receives a third fewer resumes than two years ago, he added.

“If we get a good resume, we have to make a decision really quick,” he said. “We are always looking.”

Princeton University Releases A Shocking Report. What It Says About The US Government Should Infuriate You

According to Princeton University, the US is no longer a democracy. It is an oligarchy. What’s the difference? Well, one is the government by the people – for the people and the other one is the government for special interests, the powerful and the rich. Yet, one does not need a fancy schmancy study from Princeton University to see the truth. You just have to look at our financial markets and the state of the US Economy. The FEDs simply rapped (there is no other way to put it) our financial system and the US economy for the benefit of a very few special interests and the rich by creating artificial bubbles, flooding the economy with fake money and being puppets to the industrial military conflict. It is time yet to get our pitch forks and demand change…..wait…..The Biggest Loser is on tonight…….maybe next week. 

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.” – Dwight Eisenhower

princeton university investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Princeton University Releases A Shocking Report. What It Says About The US Government Should Infuriate You Google

The Telegraph: The US is an oligarchy, study concludes

Report by researchers from Princeton and Northwestern universities suggests that US political system serves special interest organisations, instead of voters

The US government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country’s citizens, but is instead ruled by those of the rich and powerful, a new study from Princeton and Northwestern Universities has concluded.

The report, entitled Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, used extensive policy data collected from between the years of 1981 and 2002 to empirically determine the state of the US political system.

After sifting through nearly 1,800 US policies enacted in that period and comparing them to the expressed preferences of average Americans (50th percentile of income), affluent Americans (90th percentile) and large special interests groups, researchers concluded that the United States is dominated by its economic elite.

The peer-reviewed study, which will be taught at these universities in September, says: “The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organised groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence.”

Researchers concluded that US government policies rarely align with the the preferences of the majority of Americans, but do favour special interests and lobbying oragnisations: “When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organised interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the US political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favour policy change, they generally do not get it.

The positions of powerful interest groups are “not substantially correlated with the preferences of average citizens”, but the politics of average Americans and affluent Americans sometimes does overlap. This merely a coincidence, the report says, with the the interests of the average American being served almost exclusively when it also serves those of the richest 10 per cent.

The theory of “biased pluralism” that the Princeton and Northwestern researchers believe the US system fits holds that policy outcomes “tend to tilt towards the wishes of corporations and business and professional associations.”

The study comes in the wake of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, a controversial piece of legislation passed in The Supreme Court that abolished campaign contribution limits, and record low approval ratings for the US congress.

 

What Does Cramer Fear? It Should Shock The Fear Out Of You

Just as his latest blown up call to buy Tesla around at $240 about a month ago, Cramer is worried about the wrong things.  Japan, Ukraine, China and Bonds. To be hones…..who cares? While these things are not necessarily wrong from the fundamental perspective, they will have very little impact on the overall stock market and/or the US Economy going forward. 

The fact that fundamental factors have very little impact on the overall stock market is our claim to fame. Again, it is not the fundamentals that drive the stock market, it is the stock market that drives the fundamentals. Trying to figure out what the stock market will do based on fundamental data is like looking up a horses ass to try and see it’s teeth. Once again, the stock market has a beautiful mathematical/cyclical structure within it. Once that structure is understood the stock market can be predicted with the precision of a surgeon. If you would be interested in seeing what this works predicts for 2014-2017, please Click Here. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

What Does Cramer Fear? It Should Shock The Fear Out Of You Google

Cramer: Amid fits and starts, what do pros fear?

With volatility returning to the market, it’s become apparent that Wall Street pros have grown fearful. But what exactly do they fear?

Jim Cramer has an ear to the ground. Here are the concerns that he’s hearing about:

Worry #1—Japan: “Frankly, it is downright scary what’s happening in Japan,” Cramer said. “This country’s pretty much left the grid with what now looks like a failed strategy to get some sort of boom going. The Japanese stock market’s down 14 percent this year, by far the worst major market in the world, and the country’s retail sales have plummeted since a recent hike in taxes.”

Impact: Considering Japan is among the world’s largest economies, pros worry that an unexpected ripple could catch them off-guard, so they sell first and ask questions later.

Mario Tama | Getty Images News

Worry #2—China: “No matter how low the estimates go for the purchasing managers’ reports or import or export data or money supply data, the news still disappoints,” Cramer said. “I think China’s growth, at one time double digits, right now is falling from 7 percent to 5 percent. I know, I know, most countries would kill for that kind of growth, but for China that’s not good.”

Impact: Not only is China the world’s second largest economy, but, as an emerging nation, there are real concerns on Wall Street that insufficient growth could trigger serious political upheaval. And that sends buyers to the sidelines, the “Mad Money” host says.

Worry #3—Ukraine: “I think this issue is at the fulcrum of much that goes wrong these days. Every time there is a provocation by Russia, we sell off; every time,” said Cramer. “Some of that is our knee-jerk following of the selloff in Europe. Some of it is we worry about sanctions put on Russia that could end up slowing world growth.”

Impact: If there was ever a wildcard in the market, it’s Russian President Vladimir Putin. Cramer says he presents significant uncertainty to the market, which in turn prevents money from going into some higher risk assets.

Worry #4—U.S. bonds: “Bond prices are going higher and interest rates are going lower. Professionals fear this move because in a thriving economy, the opposite happens, money goes out of bonds and rates go higher.”

Impact: Cramer says the Street fears the decline in interest rates more than anything, with pros wondering if rates signal something seriously wrong in the world. “As a result, nervous money managers dump stock furiously at a moment’s notice,” he said.

Mainstream Financial Media Shocking Revelation: BUY, BUY, BUY!!!

Well, that didn’t take very long. Just 4 trading hours after Nasdaq’s bottom, the fools at traditional financial media outlets have called a market bottom. Wonderful. According to them, if you have any brains left, you should get on this spaceship as it lifts off to 5,000 and beyond. If that in itself is not a contrary indicator, I don’t know what is. 

Understandably, the reality is a little bit more complicated. In fact, our mathematical and timing work does not partake in their optimism. Quite on the contrary. As our mathematical work shows, the bear market of 2014-2017 is just around the corner. When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last 2 years. As such, the rally over the last few days might be a simple case a bounce. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please Click Here.      

dow low investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Mainstream Financial Media Shocking Revelation: BUY, BUY, BUY!!! Google

Breakout Writes: The rally has begun – here’s how to play it

With less than two hours to go in the trading session on Tuesday it looked like we might be watching the death throes of the five-year old bull market. The S&P500 (^GSPC) was down over 1%, the Nasdaq (^IXIC) was collapsing below support at 4,000 and there seemed as if the last of the dip buyers had finally run out of cash.

Just when all seemed lost the market staged one of the snapback reversals that have been the defining characteristic of 2014 thus far. Cynics would suggest there was something artificial (read: “rigged”) about the start of the rally but that didn’t make it less impressive. Paul Schatz of Heritage Capital says yesterday wasn’t the bottom for stocks in the big picture but says the trading set-up clearly favors the bulls.

.

“It’s a trading bottom,” opines Schatz in the attached video. “To me it’s pretty clear: if you close below the lows of the reversal day you’re clearly wrong and you get out but I think there’s enough indication to at least warrant a trading rally.”

For the record those lows are roughly 3,950 on the Nasdaq, 1,820 on the S&P 500 and call it 16,000 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) (NB: when in doubt round to the nearest big round number). Those acting on Schatz’s idea would buy stocks now and sell if or when the market closes below those levels. Trades don’t get less complicated in terms of controlling downside risk.

None of which applies to longer-term investors who are probably better off ignoring all the mania and sticking to their long-term plan. Days like yesterday are certainly more entertaining for market watchers but they’re also a sign that all is not well in the financial world. There’s no fundamentally rational excuse for the value of the U.S. stock market to vary by about half a trillion dollars in less than 7 hours.

The animal spirits are in control of the stock market for the time being. Be careful out there.

The Secret Behind Valuing Tesla (TSLA)

You can’t. Get over it. There are just too many uncertainties and unknowns to assign any sort of proper valuation or intrinsic value to Tesla. There is no doubt that the company has a superb and market leading product, but that in itself doesn’t mean anything. While the company has the potential to dominate the industry over the next 10..20..50…years it can also falter away and die. This is a no way to invest if you are interested in making money on Tesla. 

On top of that, Tesla is severely overpriced. Just to give an indication, it is selling at 12X Revenue Vs Apple (another high flyer) selling at just 2.7X its revenue. The bottom line is, no one really knows what Tesla’s real value is. If you would like to make money on the stock you have to look at the charts. With an upcoming bear market of 2014-2017, a severe recession, overvaluation and it’s technical setup I believe Tesla will see $50/share before it sees $250 again (if ever). In fact, we follow the stock and have a position in it in our Subscriber section if you need more information.   

tesla 2

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

The Secret Behind Valuing Tesla (TSLA) Google

Talking Numbers: The problem with Tesla? No one knows how to value it

Its cars inspire envy in auto enthusiasts all over the world. But recently, Tesla Motors’ stock performance has elicited a different emotion: despair.

That’s because the company’s stock price has fallen nearly 30 percent since hitting its February high. The move has come on relatively little news, which is not that surprising given the confusion among the analyst community about exactly how to value electric automaker

Of the 16 analysts that cover the stock, five have a positive rating, eight list it as a “hold,” and three have it as either an “underweight” or a “sell,” according to Factset, 

“There is no strong consensus here, and that contributes to its volatility,” said Andy Busch, editor of the Busch Update and a CNBC contributor. “Is it an auto company or a technology company? All we really know is that it’s the poster child for momentum,” Busch added. 

With few fundamentals to rely on, many traders have turned to the charts for help. But unfortunately, they aren’t looking much better, at least according to some technicians.

“I don’t like it when we see a stock up 550 percent in 18 months,” said Rich Ross, chief market technician of Auerbach Grayson and a “Talking Numbers” contributor. “Go back longer term, we can see Tesla’s in real danger of pulling back to the 50-day moving average. That brings you to about $150 per share. I would not be surprised if we touch that level.” 

Whatever’s driving Tesla, traders says the stock’s next move is likely to be determined by whatever the market does, and that could mean little relief for investors.

“We are due for a larger selloff in the broader market,” said Enis Tanner of riskreversal.com. “If that’s the case, Tesla still likely has more selling ahead of it.”

Junk Bonds Surge Past 2007 Top. What It Says About The Stock Market Is Beyond Disturbing

As per Bloomberg report below, a total of $85 Billion in junk loans have been raised this year to finance acquisitions, topping 2007’s record pace.  This should not come as a surprise to the readers of this blog. While most market pundits will see this as a positive economic development, it is anything but that.  It is a symptom of the financial system that has gone awol.

A system where the Central Bank and the US Government encourage speculation and massive asset bubble creation. A system where the capital is miss allocated and only the rich benefit. Unfortunately, this sort of a financial stupidity can only lead to one thing. An eventual collapse of our financial system and a severe US Recession. As such, you should not view this “Junk Bond” surge as anything other than a proverbial market TOP Bell. 

This is further confirmed by our mathematical and timing work showing a severe bear market between 2014-2017. If you would be interested in learning when such a bear market will start (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please Click Here

junk bonds 2 investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Junk Bonds Surge Past 2007 Top. What It Says About The Stock Market Is Beyond Disturbing Google

Bloomberg Writes: Junk Buyout Loans Eclipse ’07 Record in Dealmaking Frenzy 

The U.S. junk-loan market has never fueled so much dealmaking.

A total of $85 billion of loans have been raised this year to finance acquisitions, topping 2007’s record pace, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Issuance is set to accelerate as Avago Technologies Ltd. locks in the year’s second-biggest loan for its takeover of chipmaker LSI Corp. as soon as today and Men’s Wearhouse Inc. (MW) borrows $1.1 billion to fund its deal for Jos. A. Bank Clothiers Inc.

Leveraged loans are booming as the value of takeovers in the U.S. reaches levels last seen in 2008. While regulators have warned excesses may be emerging in riskier parts of the market as the Federal Reserve’s zero-interest rate policy extends into a sixth year, the loan surge underscores renewed confidence in the ability of the least-creditworthy companies to expand as the world’s largest economy strengthens.

“There’s a lot of money waiting to be put to work,” Judith Fishlow Minter, co-head of U.S. loan capital markets at Royal Bank of Canada, said in a telephone interview from New York. “The market is exceptionally strong.”

Acquisition Debt

Acquisition financing accounted for 29 percent of the $20.5 billion in leveraged-loan issuance this month, rising from 20 percent of overall borrowings in March, according to a JPMorgan Chase & Co. report dated April 11.

The bank is arranging the loan for Houston-based Men’s Wearhouse, which has a B+ rating atStandard & Poor’s, or four levels below investment-grade. The retailer’s Ba3 junk rating from Moody’s Investors Service is one step higher.

Leveraged loans are rated below Baa3 by Moody’s and lower than BBB- at S&P.

“It’s great from a shorter-term perspective to see more supply,” Jamie Farnham, who manages about $7 billion of high-yield bonds and leveraged loans for Los Angeles-based TCW Group Inc., said in a phone interview.

“From a longer-term perspective it’s indicating that you’re in a later part of the cycle,” Farnham said. “This is the time where you shift up in credit quality.”

Private-equity firms are using more debt to finance buyouts.

Rising Leverage

First-lien borrowings at speculative-grade companies equaled 4.2 times their earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization in the first quarter, the highest since the 4.6 ratio in the last three months of 2007, according to S&P Capital IQ Leveraged Commentary & Data.

A total $760 billion in mergers and acquisitions of U.S. companies were announced in the year ended March 1, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s the most for a 12-month period since April 2008.

“Markets are extremely accommodating for M&A financing,” John McAuley, co-head of U.S. Leveraged Finance at Citigroup Inc., said in a phone interview. “We expect that conditions will remain favorable for some time.”

The $4.6 billion loan being raised by Avago is the biggest since the one obtained by Community Health Systems Inc., a U.S. hospital chain, in January to help fund its $7.6 billion purchase of Health Management Associates Inc., Bloomberg show data show.

The takeover was the largest of a hospital company since 2006, when HCA Holdings Inc. (HCA) was acquired by private-equity firms including KKR & Co. for about $33 billion including debt.

“We’re not in an environment that some could argue we were in pre-crisis,” said McAuley. “Today’s market is still exercising discipline.”

Fund Inflows

The Fed has kept its benchmark rate close to zero since December 2008 to help support an economic recovery after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. deepened the worst recession since the Great Depression.

After inundating the U.S. economy with more than $3 trillion, the Fed began reducing stimulus by scaling back its monthly bond purchases this year.

Individuals have made deposits into funds that buy junk loans for 95 straight weeks, including a record $63 billion in 2013, according to JPMorgan. The funds this year have attracted $7.8 billion, with last week’s inflow of $48 million being the smallest since July 2012.

‘Hot’ Demand

The loan for Men’s Wearhouse is covenant-light, meaning it lacks financial maintenance requirements that, when violated, can give lenders an opportunity to negotiate with the borrower. About two-thirds of loans this year are without such protections, rising from about half in 2013, according to JPMorgan.

Covenant-light lending is on the rise as the global default rate for speculative-grade corporate debt is projected to decline to 2.2 percent at the end of this year, from 2.3 percent at the end of March, according to an April 7 report from Moody’s. The forecast is below the historic average of 4.7 percent, based on data going back to 1983.

“There’s enough demand for virtually any deal,” John Fraser, a managing partner at 3i Group Plc’s U.S. debt business, said in an interview at the firm’s New York office.

The rise in acquisition loans gives lenders more opportunity to be selective in a “hot” market, according to Fraser, who oversees $3.8 billion of U.S. credit assets for the London-based private-equity firm.

Careful Investing

The Fed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency updated guidance on lending to speculative-grade borrowers about year a ago, citing “deteriorated” standards and the willingness of investors to accept looser terms.

“You just have to be very careful,” Beth Maclean, a bank loan manager at Pacific Investment Management Co., said in a Bloomberg radio interview on April 11. “There are more aggressive deals being done.”

Collateralized loan obligations, the biggest buyers of junk loans that fueled the 2005-2007 buyout boom, will raise as much as $90 billion in 2014, the most in seven years, based on a forecast fromWells Fargo & Co. this month.

Deals done before the financial crisis were “incredibly large,” with private-equity firms grouping together to back a single buyout, said RBC’s Fishlow Minter.

The strongest single quarter on record for merger loans was when $118 billion were raised in the last three months of 2007, Bloomberg data show. That was the same time when Energy Future Holdings Corp. got more than $20 billion of loans backing its $48 billion buyout by KKR, TPG Capital and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, Bloomberg data show.

The Texas utility, formerly known as TXU Corp., is negotiating a plan with creditors that would reduce the time it takes to reorganize under bankruptcy protection.

Lenders are still looking for more opportunities to invest in M&A financings and LBOs, according to Citigroup’s McAuley.

“They are overwhelmed with refinancing opportunities, and underwhelmed with strategic financing opportunities” he said.