InvestWithAlex.com 

Is It Time To Short Facebook?

Facebook has been on fire lately with its stock price appreciating 200% over the last 9 months. Of course, Facebook is not alone. Tesla, Google and many other highly speculative issues are up big time since this credit driven stock market rally made a push for its blow off top a year ago.

With that said, Facebook is going out on a limb of stupidity with it’s ridiculously overpriced purchase of WhatsApp two weeks ago and now an apparent purchase of drone maker Titan Aerospace for $60 million.  Something tells me that Titan doesn’t have any revenue either, but that’s beside the point.

The issue here is as follows. Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t know what to do with all of his cash. It’s burning a hole in his pocket and he is making idiotic decisions reminiscent of the tech bubble. While Facebook’s stock is still technically strong, there is no doubt that these stupid capital allocations will catch up to Facebook sooner rather than later.Once the market begins to breakdown as per my FORECAST I would anticipate Facebook to come down significantly.  

Making Facebook a great short opportunity. (Not yet, wait for a technical breakdown)

z10

Facebook will buy drone maker Titan Aerospace for about $60 million, a source familiar with the situation told CNBC on Tuesday.

The solar-powered drones can reportedly be airborne for up to five years without having to land.

The deal is part of Facebook’s ambition to provide Internet access worldwide. News of a possible deal was first reported by TechCrunch.

Last summer, Mark Zuckerberg announced a project called Internet.org—a partnership with a number of other tech giants that aims to make Internet available to everyone in the world. The solar-powered drones could help Facebook provide Internet to areas around the world without it, starting with Africa.

Titan Aerospace is privately held, and is based in New Mexico. The news comes after the social network acquired messaging app WhatsApp for $19 billion last month.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Is Time To Short Facebook? Google

When Buffett Speaks Peasants Listen

Over the last few days Warren Buffett released his annual letter to shareholders as well as did a few interviews. Here are some of the highlights. 

  • Ukraine doesn’t matter – I agree. 
  • The stock market is NOT being manipulated – I agree. 
  • The US Economy is OK, but it will be fine. – Disagree. As per my mathematical & timing work, we will have a severe bear market and a recession over the next 3 years. 
  • Railroads will do very well in the future –  hmm, OK, check out some railroad stocks everyone. 
  • Bitcoin is a speculative BS – I agree

Whether or not you agree with Buffett or his policies, it always good to read or listen to one of the brightest minds on the face of this Earth. You can check his latest letter to shareholders here Berkshire Letters  

buffett investwithalex

Two days after publishing his annual letter to shareholders, Warren Buffett is on CNBC speaking with Becky Quick.

Equity fund managers Todd Combs and Ted Weschler will also be on later in an extremely rare appearance.

On Ukraine

Off the bat, Quick asked for his take on the tension in Ukraine.

Rather than addressing the turmoil directly, Buffett said that he does not consider these types of skirmishes when he invests in companies.

“I never really buy businesses based on macro factors,” he said.

He noted that he invested in his first business in the wake of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

On The Stock Market

Regarding the market itself, Quick asked if the mom-and-pop investor really could get a fair shot as some argue that the market is actually rigged.

Buffett was skeptical that the $20-plus-trillion stock market could actually be rigged.

“People should stop calling it the stock market,” he said. “It’s American business.”

On The U.S. Economy

“Exactly what’s been going on since the fall of 2009 continues,” he said, reminding us that he gets live updates from the 80+ companies he invests in. “Moderate but consistent growth for four and a half years. Every now and then we get excited about a speeding up and every now and again we worry about a double dip.

“In terms of what we see, it’s been almost a straight line, but not at the kind of slope that people would like. But not flat either.”

“We haven’t gotten wildly optimistic and we haven’t gotten wildly pessimistic,” he added, emphasizing that things have been pretty steady.

On Weather

“It’s certainly a factor,” he said. “Our railroads don’t work as well … and those things compound.”

“The biggest risk … to us would be earthquakes in New Zealand,” said Buffett recognizing that the hurricane insurance business has been very good to Berkshire.

On Selling Coca-Cola, Wells Fargo, And American Express:

“None of the stocks are forever but they’re for very long terms,” said Buffett to a question of when he planned on selling these stocks.

On IBM

A reader asked if Buffett felt he made a mistake with this stock.

“The financial performance has been pretty good but it’s been helped with low tax rates,” Buffett said, adding that there was a lot going on in the business due to cloud tech. “It’s fair to say I know less about the future of IBM than I do about Wells Fargo or Coca-Cola. … In terms of the price action, that means little to me. The fewer the shares outstanding the better I like it. … I would like to see the revenues pick up.

“We bought a few more shares last year, but not many. We bought a few shares this year.”

On Railroads

Buffett’s still bullish on the industry

“The future of railroads is very good,”  he said.

On The Keystone Pipeline

 It’s a “very good idea for the country.” 

“I’d vote yes,” he said later.

On Being Considered “Too Big To Fail”

Buffett says Berkshire has heard nothing from regulators about the derivatives on his book making his company TBTF. “We never have any significant short-term debt, we always have bundles of cash. … We’re large, but Exxon Mobile is large. … It’s very unlikely we’d be categorized like that.”

On Washington

“It’s more or less a stalemate,” said Buffett, who also said he can’t imagine things getting worse.

On Raising The Minimum Wage

“It really cuts both ways, you’d like to have people getting paid more but you also want more people employed. I could argue both sides. … What you really should do is increase the earned income tax credit. … I think you can accomplish way more through the earned income tax credit. … There’s trade offs on the minimum wage and you can do all these studies but they don’t know.”

The Greatest Thing Obama Can Do To Create Jobs

“Further fiscal stimulus would increase job growth,” said Buffett, “but you pay a price for that.”

Buffett also disagrees with the view that the Fed’s low-interest policy is exacerbating the issue.

Who’s doing a better job cleaning up their mess? — Obama or BofA CEO Brian Moynihan

“Brian Moynihan didn’t have to convince the United States Congress,” said Buffett.

On Ukraine as WWIII or the next Cold War

“The last thing you’d want to do is hold money during a war. … During WWII the stock market advanced. … You’re gonna be a lot better off holding productive assets over the next 50 years over stocks or bitcoin.”

On Bitcoin

“It’s not a currency,” he said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if it wasn’t around in the next 10-20 years.”

“It’s being priced off the dollar,” Buffett added. “It is not a durable means of exchange.”

On Todd Combs And Ted Weschler

“Todd and ted look at investments very much like I do,” he said, noting that they think about businesses rather than stocks.

“It’s a combination of soundness and brilliance,” he added saying that they think about the things that haven’t happened yet.

“They’ve made Berkshire billions already.”

 Todd Combs, Ted Weschler and Tracy Britt Speak

“Ninety percent of things you can dismiss within five minutes,” said Todd Combs, who said he spends much of his time reading company filings.

“Know the situation; wait for the right price,” said Weschler on his investment process. “Be ready.”

On activist investing:

“The way some people use the word ‘shareholder value’ kind of puzzles me,” said Buffett, at Berkshire he wants to build sustainable earning power over time. He said this in reference to Carl Icahn’s push for Apple to buy back stock. He said that Apple’s refusal to go all the way with Icahn’s proposal was likely a sign that it was looking to do the same thing.

On an economic slowdown:

“My impression is that the American economy over the last five years has been moving at a steady rate, upwards.”

Buffett said that some sectors may not be doing as well, and the economy isn’t growing as fast as people would like.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

When Buffett Speaks Peasants Listen Google

Mortgage Origination Collapses, Cash Is King. What’s Next?

 I know, I know. You are just as shocked to the core as I am. Here is a quick summary: 

  • Loan originations declined to the lowest point since November 2008
  • Property sales remained relatively strong, supported by increased cash purchases…..
  • Approximately 709,000 HARP-eligible loans vs. 2,306,000 in Jan. 2013
  • 2013 home equity lending up 26 percent vs. 2012, but still down over 90 percent from 2006
  • HELOC performance in recent vintages is pristine, but new problem loan rates continue to rise for those beginning to amortize

So, loan origination is the lowest since 2008 and down 60% year-over-year, but investors are still buying hand over fist. Well, that’s dandy. If Blackstone Group is financing dentists and plumbers so they can find them investment properties it mean the real estate market is going through the roof. Right? Duh…Read my full report on collapsing Real Estate Here

USHOWN_Max_630_378

Black Knight’s January Mortgage Data Shows Further Declines in Loan Originations and Fewer Refinance Prospects  

But First Increase in Home Equity Lending Since 2006

March 04, 2014
 
  • Loan originations declined to the lowest point since November 2008
  • Property sales remained relatively strong, supported by increased cash purchases
  • Approximately 709,000 HARP-eligible loans vs. 2,306,000 in Jan. 2013
  • 2013 home equity lending up 26 percent vs. 2012, but still down over 90 percent from 2006
  • HELOC performance in recent vintages is pristine, but new problem loan rates continue to rise for those beginning to amortize

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — March 4, 2014 — Today, the Data and Analytics division of Black Knight Financial Services released its latest Mortgage Monitor Report, looking at data as of the end of January 2014. Black Knight observed a general decline in the overall “refinancible” population of both traditional and HARP-eligible borrowers with associated loan origination volumes dropping in both categories as well.

“In January, we saw origination volume continue to decline to its lowest point since 2008, with prepayment speeds pointing to further drops in refinance-related originations,” said Herb Blecher, senior vice president of Black Knight Financial Services’ Data & Analytics division. “Overall originations were down almost 60 percent year-over-year, with HARP volumes (according to the most recent FHFA report) down 70 percent over the same period. These declines are largely tied to the increased mortgage interest rate environment, which is having a significant impact on the number of borrowers with incentive to refinance. A high-level view of this refinancible population shows a decline of about 13 percent just over the last two months. 

“Of course, in addition to higher interest rates, a good deal of this decline can be attributed to the fact that a majority of those who could refinance at historically low rates in recent years already have, and we see a similar dynamic in terms of HARP-eligible loans. The volume of HARP refinances over the past year has driven this population down to about 700,000 loans in January 2014, as compared to over 2.3 million at the same time last year. From a geographic perspective, outside of Florida and Nevada, we see the Midwestern states of Illinois, Michigan, Missouri and Ohio have among the highest percentage of HARP eligibility.”

However, while loan origination volume has declined year-over-year, property sales activity remained relatively strong through year-end 2013, with December’s monthly sales up 3.7 percent year-over-year and full year 2013 up 8.4 percent vs. 2012. Fourth-quarter sales were bolstered by a jump in the percentage of cash sales, to over 40 percent of the total, up from about 25 percent in the prior year.

The most recent data also marked 2013 as the first year in which home equity lending had increased since 2006 — though total home equity volumes (including both loans and lines of credit) were still down more than 90 percent from that time. Black Knight found that the current resurgence in home equity origination is concentrated in so-called “super-prime” borrowers, with average credit scores for first- and second-lien HELOCs at 786 and 779, respectively. This concentration has paid off in terms of loan performance: delinquency rates on HELOCs originated over the past four years have averaged at just 0.1 percent. At the same time, HELOCs originated prior to 2004 (and therefore in the amortizing stage of the loan) are seeing increased rates of new problem loans — up 27 percent year-over-year as of January.

           As was reported in Black Knight’s most recent First Look release, other key results include:​

​Total U.S. loan delinquency rate: 6.27%    ​
​Month-over-month change in delinquency rate: ​-2.96%
​Total U.S. foreclosure pre-sale inventory rate:  ​2.35%

 

​Month-over-month change in foreclosure pre-sale inventory ​rate:        ​-5.32%
​States with highest percentage of non-current* loans: ​MS, NJ, FL, NY, LA
​States with the lowest percentage of non-current* loans:         ​ ​MT, CO, AK, SD, ND

​*Non-current totals combine foreclosures and delinquencies as a percent of active loans in that state.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Mortgage Origination Collapses, Cash Is King. What’s Next? Google

Future Weapons Of War. US Treasury Bonds

What would be the first thing to happen if China and the US ever go to war?

Today, one of Putin’s advisers Sergei Glazyev gave us an indication. China would immediately dump $1.3 Trillion in the US Treasury at market. Many other nations would follow immediately (sell first, ask questions later) making the US insolvent and bankrupt overnight. Surging interest rates, collapsing equity markets and devastated economy would  be the immediate result. Surely, the FED would try to backstop any such action but they will be powerless given the volume. 

In fact, this action would probably cause more economic damage than any nuclear weapon could.  

It is unfortunate that the US finds itself in such a situation, but that is the price we have to pay for today’s “fake prosperity” through monetary policy, credit infusion and speculation. Even though Sergei Glazyev is being silenced for the time being, today, he gave us a clear indication of how future wars will be fought by suggesting that Russia should dump all of its Treasure holding if the US is to impose sanctions. 

1977TreasuryBond

MOSCOW, March 4 (RIA Novosti) – An adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday that authorities would issue general advice to dump US government bonds in the event of Russian companies and individuals being targeted by sanctions over events in Ukraine.

Sergei Glazyev said the United States would be the first to suffer in the event of any sanctions regime.

“The Americans are threatening Russia with sanctions and pulling the EU into a trade and economic war with Russia,” Glazyev said. “Most of the sanctions against Russia will bring harm to the United States itself, because as far as trade relations with the United States go, we don’t depend on them in any way.”

Glazyev noted that Russia is a creditor to the United States.

“We hold a decent amount of treasury bonds – more than $200 billion – and if the United States dares to freeze accounts of Russian businesses and citizens, we can no longer view America as a reliable partner,” he said. “We will encourage everybody to dump US Treasury bonds, get rid of dollars as an unreliable currency and leave the US market.”

According to US Treasury data from the end of 2013, Russian investments in US government bonds total around $139 billion out of a total of $5.8 trillion of US debt held in foreign hands.

US Secretary of State John Kerry on Saturday warned that Russian military interventions in Ukraine, which have been justified by the Kremlin as protection for residents in heavily ethnic Russian-populated regions, could result in “serious repercussions” for Moscow.

“Unless immediate and concrete steps are taken by Russia to deescalate tensions, the effect on US-Russian relations and on Russia’s international standing will be profound,” Kerry said.

Kerry mentioned economic sanctions, visa bans and asset freezes as possible measures.

Former deputy energy minister and lively government critic Vladimir Milov slammed Glazyev’s remarks, saying they would put further downward pressure on the ruble, which was pushed down Monday to a record low of 36.5 against the dollar amid fears about the possible outbreak of war.

“That idiot Glazyev will keep talking until the dollar is worth 60 [rubles],” Milov wrote on his Twitter account.

A high-ranking Kremlin source was quick to distance his office from Glazyev’s remarks, however, insisting to RIA Novosti that they represented only his personal position.

Glazyev was just expressing his views as an academic, and not as a presidential adviser, the Kremlin insider said.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Future Weapons Of War. US Treasury Bonds Google

Shocking News: 1.3 Million Homes In California Are Still Underwater

Even though the prices have surged 20-30% in some areas of California last year alone, incredibly, 1.3 million homes are still underwater. If you count the number of houses with 10% equity or less the number should easily approach 2 million homes or 20%.This should come as no surprise to those following this blog.

What is surprising to me is that this level of “undervaluation” still exists in today’s market. Even though the FED pumped in close to $1 Trillion into the US Economy over the last 3 years, this “dead cat” bounce in real estate is failing to impress.  With an upcoming severe bear market and recession within the US Economy, real estate market is bound to decline further. You can read both reports and timing associated with both markets Click Here.   

Just as quick summary, real estate market is completing stage 2 (bounce, aka…dead cat bounce). Once this stage is over, I believe it is already over, the real estate market will start its stage 3 collapse. Typically, this stage is more powerful and takes the market much lower than the one before it. Get yourself ready. 

underwaterhouse-investwithalex

Our Friends at Dr.HousingBubble: 

Does housing policy amount to price fixing from banks? Negative equity, accounting standards, and control of supply. 1.3 million homes in California still underwater.

Housing is an industry made and broken at the margins.  This is why in areas like Beverly Hills or Newport Coast, a small number of sales can skew prices dramatically.  Housing prices in more homogenous markets where many homes are built in cookie cutter fashion provide a better metric of future appraisal values.  How so?  If you have a builder building 1,000 identical homes in Las Vegas, it is hard to justify that your 3 bedroom 2 baths home at 1,500 square feet is valued more than an identical one next door even though you might think it is worth more.  Also, housing is the biggest purchase for most Americans.  You may buy multiple cars over your life but not many homes.  This is why the measures to control inventory by banks and the flood of investors has tilted this market into unfamiliar waters.  High prices in the face of very low inventory.  People struggling to pay mortgages yet banks having no issue buying up a large portion of single family inventory.  Given that the Fed is the mortgage market, are we seeing a minor (or major) portion of price fixing in housing?

Price fixing in real estate

First it may be useful to give a standard definition of price fixing:

“Price fixing is an agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.”

For housing, most of the definition is met.  Banks fully control distressed inventory and the Fed essentially owns the mortgage market.  Since real estate is not standard like say a farm product, there is little ability to set prices in a uniform way however by controlling inventory via stunted accounting rules and slowing down on foreclosures over the years, slowly real estate has moved from weak hands (i.e., American consumers) to stronger hands (i.e., Fed backed banks).  The main mission of the Fed was to protect member banks (many that owned overvalued real estate and derivatives).  All other economic results have been a consequence of this primary mission.

One of the most obvious ways this is revealed is through the number of properties that are still underwater across the nation.  First, take a look at how many properties remain underwater in California where home prices jumped last year in a way we have not seen since the last housing bubble:

NegEquity1

15 percent of California homeowners are still underwater despite the dramatic jump in prices last year.  Throw in those with less than 10 percent equity and you have nearly 20 percent of all homeowners underwater or near underwater.  A massive amount of California homeowners have no equity in their homes even though prices surged last year by 20 to 30 percent in some areas.

Yet price gains are tapering off.  Investors have lost some of their appetite in the market.  Investors buy with the intention of making money off rental incomes or flipping in an ever increasing market.  Prices today are stuck where they were back in the summer of 2013.  The ability for households to buy is constrained by weak income growth.  In California, only 1 out of 3 households can actually purchase a home today at current prices and with their actual earned income.

In California, we have a total pool of housing units of 12,552,658:

census data california

Of these 6,781,817 are occupied by “owners” although you will see from the previous chart that 1.3 million of these owners are fully underwater.  They are paying more on their asset than it is currently worth.  This is typical for a depreciating asset like a car but not a home.  Many of these people bought during the last bubble that ended more than half a decade ago!

Banking policy has worked well for banks and investors have done very well over the last few years.  Peppered throughout the mainstream press is the grim reality that over 5,000,000 households have lost their mortgaged properties via foreclosure.  Many of these homes simply shifted hands to Wall Street, hedge funds, and investors.  The single family home market has become a speculative vehicle once again simply in a different form.

We’ve already noted how many homes are “owner occupied” so it might be useful to see how many homes sold in the latest month of data:

January home sales for California:           25,832

Last month, only 0.38 percent of all properties in the owner occupied category shifted hands.  If demand, supply, interest rates, and emotions are playing into the trend then these few properties will set the market.  The average January sales volume is 31,393 dating back to 1988 in California so demand was much lower (despite more inventory and a much bigger population) yet prices were higher because of heavy investor buying.  Investors seem to be pulling back a bit and that is why we are seeing some more inventory creep in and sales inching back.  Price gains are also moderating.

It is safe to say that the current housing market has many forms of price fixing through a connection of government policy, banking regulation, and Fed monetary policy.  At the moment, this may not be in favor of future homebuyers but it certainly is in favor of current owners and banks.  The dialogue now seems to revolve around “do I speculate and jump in?” or “will market forces break through the control and shift prices?”  This of course assumes you want to “own” although many are opting to rent now.  I don’t buy the arguments from people saying that they simply want to buy for security and then whine how they “missed” the last opportunity and are now locked out forever.  If you really believe that thesis, why not buy today?  If you are buying for the “long run” meaning 30 years or so this minor jump up is nothing in the full scheme of things.  Similar to dollar cost averaging, if you have a long horizon why does the short-term matter?  Many however are speculating but don’t want to call it that.

This is fascinating from an economic stand point because we have never been in a situation like this especially with so much riding on housing.  Price fixing is not a dirty word necessarily but this is definitely going on to a certain degree.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Shocking News: 1.3 Million Homes In California Are Still Underwater Google

Ukranian Neo-Fascist Trying Their Best To Start A War. Obama & The US Media Buy It

The media war between Ukraine, Russian and the West is going into overdrive.Remember all of those innocent Ukrainians in Kiev wanting freedom, liberty and rainbows? Turns out, a lot of them are Neo-Fascist who hate Jews and Russians. Let’s take a closer look at who is trying to start this war.

Russia Government:

 -OR- Ukraine’s Illegitimate Government Ran By Turchynov

  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS SHIPS THREATENED IF ARMS NOT LAID DOWN
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS SHIPS THREATENED WITH SEIZURE
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS SITUATION AROUND FLEET IS DANGEROUS
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS RUSSIA INCREASING CRIMEA FORCES
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FLEET HAS BLOCKED UKRAINIAN NAVY VESSELS IN SEVASTOPOL BAYS

So, let me ask you. Who is beating the war drum here? Turchynov is begging the West to get involved at any cost. He doesn’t care what that cost is. Never mind that any involvement by NATO might lead to WW 3.  It is my hope that the US Government and the US Media wake up, pull their head out of their collective ass and see who it is that they are dealing with.  It’s never a good idea to do business with Neo-Fascist. 

Here is my quick analysis. Russia is done. They have taken Crimea and they are more than satisfied with that. If no further provocation occurs, media hysteria will die down over the next few days and our financial markets will recover.  Cheers!!!

Why would markets recover? 

2ukraine-existential-threat-russia.si

CNBC: Russian officials: “Fascists in power now in Ukraine”

Russia’s Upper Council session on whether or not to approve President Vladimir Putin‘s request to send armed forces to Crimea was akin to traveling back in time, rhetorically speaking.

One Russian legislator said: “Look who came to power now in Ukraine—radicals, nationalists, fascists.”

(Read moreParliament approves troops)

In fact, the word ‘fascist’ was used several times throughout the debate (though actual debate was limited since the legislators seemed to all be of the same opinion). 

Another quoted a Russian poet and signaled that now, “it’s time to use weapons, not words.”

Though the White House said it was monitoring the situation in Crimea closely, Putin and most Russian officials see Obama as extremely weak. 

A Russian business source with deep knowledge of Russia’s political, economic, and security situation, who requested anonymity, said morale in the Ukrainian army was low, giving Putin an upper hand.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Ukranian Neo-Fascist Trying Their Best To Start A War. Obama & The US Media Buy It Google

 

Attention Everyone: Janet Yellen Declares Victory.

As per Bloomberg, just two weeks into her tenure, Janet Yellen has already declaring victory on bond vigilantes. Even though FED’s own minutes (from 2008 collapse) show that they are completely incompetent and don’t really know what is happening in our financial markets, the idiots in our media continue to believe that the FED can somehow control the markets or interest rates. 

Again, don’t confuse cause and effect. It is the market and not the FED that lead the economy. While it might look like the FED can control the interest rates, the yield curve and the financial markets, that is never the case. Anyone believing in such absurdity will lose money. Case and point, interest rates are up over 100% in the last 1.5 years. Once this correction is over the interest rates will continue to surge higher (despite upcoming recession).  

As a side note, the market likes to Baptize all income Chairman by fire. So was the case with Greenspan in 1987 and Bernanke in 2007-09. With my timing forecasts indicating a severe bear market and recession between 2014-2017, are you ready Janet Yellen?  

What bear market forecast? 

Inside The International Monetary Fund's Rethinking Macro Policy Conference

Yellen Tames Bond Vigilantes With Volatility at Pre-Taper Levels

When it comes to monetary policy, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen is doing all she can to ensure there’s little difference between herself and Ben S. Bernanke. The bond market is taking notice.

Measures of volatility based on interest-rate swaps have plunged this year and are now approaching levels not seen since before the Fed first signaled in May its intention to reduce the unprecedented bond buying that’s supported the U.S. economy, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

More from Bloomberg.com: Putin Crimea Grab Shows Trail of Warning Signs West Ignored

The relative calm underscores the strides Fed officials have made in reassuring investors that its pullback won’t automatically lead to higher interest rates. After yields on 10-year Treasuries reached a 29-month high at the start of the year, they have since retreated as Yellen pledged to maintain her predecessor’s tapering policy in “measured steps” and keep borrowing costs low to support the U.S. labor market.

“Bond markets understand that Bernanke and now Janet Yellen are talking from the same song sheet,” Neil Mackinnon, a global macro strategist at VTB Capital Plc and former U.K. Treasury official, said in a telephone interview from London on Feb. 24. “The market has bought into the idea that Fed tapering is not tightening.”

More from Bloomberg.com: Winter Storm to Strike New York to Washington Later Today

Treasuries have returned 1.9 percent this year, rebounding from a 3.4 percent annual drop that was the worst since 2009, index data compiled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch show.

Taper Tantrum

Yields on 10-year government bonds, a benchmark for everything from mortgages to car loans and corporate bonds, decreased to 2.65 percent last week from a high of 3.05 percent in January, which was the highest since July 2011. The yield was 2.6 percent as of 11:58 a.m. in New York.

More from Bloomberg.com: Russia Gas Threat Shows Putin Using Pipes to Press Ukraine

Because of the Fed’s quantitative easing, economists including Michael Feroli, the chief U.S. economist at New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co., warned policy makers last week that a financial-market convulsion similar to the “tantrum” that occurred in 2013 may be unavoidable when the central bank does raise interest rates.

“Whenever the decision to tighten policy is made, then the instability seen in summer of 2013 is likely to reappear,” Feroli, a former Fed economist, and his co-authors Anil Kashyap of the University of Chicago, Kermit Schoenholtz of New York University’s Stern School of Business and Hyun Song Shin of Princeton University, said a Feb. 28 gathering.

In the debt markets, volatility gauges provide a more sanguine outlook.

Anxieties Diminish

The Chicago Board Option Exchange Interest Rate Volatility Index, a measure that reflects the cost for contracts to protect against sudden losses by locking-in fixed rates, tumbled last week to the lowest since May.

Normalized volatility on options for 10-year interest-rate swaps due in six months, a gauge of swings of yields (USGG10YR) on similar-maturity Treasuries, dropped as low as 73.99 basis points last month, the least since May 30.

The lack of skittishness stands in contrast to the surge of volatility set off by Bernanke’s comments in May, when he said policy makers could scale back the Fed’s $85 billion in monthly bond purchases in the “next few meetings.”

That month, implied volatility on the contracts known as swaptions surged by the most since Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed in September 2008. Yields on 10-year Treasuries, which fell to a low of 1.61 percent on May 1, eclipsed 3 percent by September and sparked losses in fixed-income assets.

Seasonal Effect

“Much of the 2013 rate volatility was driven by uncertainty in the outlook for Federal Reserve policy,” Jake Lowery, a money manager in Atlanta at ING U.S. Investment Management, which oversees $200 billion, said by telephone on Feb. 25. This year, “the relative certainty in the near-term direction of Fed policy has had its own suppressive effect.”

Although the harsh winter weather contributed to retail sales, manufacturing and housing data that fell short of economists’ estimates, Yellen reiterated on Feb. 27 that the central bank is likely to keep curtailing its stimulus.

The Fed has reduced its purchases of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities by $10 billion at each of its past two policy meetings and economists surveyed by Bloomberg estimate the central bank will maintain that pace until it stops buying bonds in December.

At the same time, she signaled the Fed is moving away from a year-old commitment to lift interest rates from close to zero once the jobless rate falls below 6.5 percent and will instead provide investors with qualitative guidance on its intentions.

Numerical Threshold

Joblessness (USURTOT) in the U.S. fell to 6.6 percent in January, the lowest since October 2008. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg predict the unemployment rate for February, set to be released on March 7, remained unchanged from the previous month.

“We do want to give markets as much of an indication of how we expect to conduct policy as we can,” Yellen said.

Implied yields on federal funds futures traded on the CME Group Inc.’s exchange now show a 58 percent chance the Fed will boost its benchmark rate, which has been in a range of zero to 0.25 percent since December 2008, in July. That’s seven months after economists predict the Fed will end its bond buying.

As recently as September, traders were pricing in the likelihood that the Fed will lift rates by the start of 2015.

The decline in volatility is evidence that debt investors are underestimating the risk yields will jump as the effects of the weather-related slowdown on the U.S. economy pass, said Vincent Chaigneau, global head of rates and foreign-exchange strategy at Societe Generale SA, one of the 22 primary dealers that are obligated to bid at U.S. government debt auctions.

American Optimism

“The economic data has been very distorted,” Chaigneau said in a Feb. 24 telephone interview from Paris. “By spring, when the data improves again, we’ll get some significant market action. Rates will increase and volatility will increase.”

The U.S. economy will expand 2.9 percent this year, according to forecasters in a Bloomberg survey released on Feb. 13. That’s higher than their projection for 2.6 percent growth at the start of the year and would be the fastest in a decade.

Consumer confidence improved in February from a month earlier as more Americans grew optimistic about the outlook for the economy, according to a Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan sentiment index released last week.

Even with the prospect of more robust economic growth, greater clarity by the Fed will help temper any increase in government bond yields, according to Charles Diebel, fixed-income strategist at Lloyds Banking Group Plc in London.

Fiscal Restraint

Yields on 10-year bonds fluctuated within a 0.22 percentage-point range in February, the narrowest since April 2007, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“The last thing Yellen wants to do is be unpredictable,” Diebel said in a telephone interview on Feb. 24. “She wants to be as predictable as she possibly can be.”

The $11.8 trillion market for Treasuries may also benefit from a stronger fiscal balance in the U.S. and less political discord, according to Erik Schiller, a Newark, New Jersey-based money manager for Prudential Fixed-Income, which oversees $405 billion.

Faster growth and spending cuts will help narrow the U.S. deficit to 3 percent of the economy this fiscal year, the lowest in seven years, the Congressional Budget Office projected last month. The estimated gap would compare with 9.8 percent in 2009, the widest since at least 1974, and is close to the average of the past four decades, the agency said.

Lawmakers in December passed the first bipartisan budget from a divided Congress in almost three decades, just two months after a political stalemate caused a government shutdown and pushed the U.S. toward its first default. Last month, Congress suspended the nation’s debt limit until March 2015.

We have “relatively stable long-term deficit projections, very low potential policy risk,” Schiller said in a telephone interview. “Both of those are helping to keep things muted.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Attention Everyone: Janet Yellen Declares Victory.Google

What Does China Think About Ukraine?

Russia and China go way back and have a wonderful working relationship. This was evident at the beginning of Sochi Olympics when Putin and Jinping had a great time together at the opening ceremony and beyond.

Where was Obama? Oh, that’s right, Obama had tried to prove a point by sending an irrelevant “Gay Delegation”. 

Of course, China is watching this situation very carefully, but not for the reasons that you might think. China could care less about Ukraine and at the end of the day is likely to stay out of it. What China is looking for is the level of international response. If Russia is able to get away with Ukraine (as I believe it will), China will be further emboldened to push its agenda in South China Sea and Japanese’s Islands.

Will this have an immediate impact on the US Economy and financial markets? NO. However, all of this will have a significant impact on the overall macroeconomic picture, a picture that will in time impact all of the above.   

ep91-header

BEIJING: China, which consistently says it opposes interference in other countries’ internal affairs, is looking to “maintain principles” on Ukraine, it said Monday after Russia insisted the two were in broad agreement.

Moscow has appeared keen to stress that it has a major international ally on its military intervention in Ukraine, and Beijing frequently backs its positions against Western powers on thorny issues, such as the protracted conflict in Syria.

But analysts say China is torn between wanting to support Russia and keeping to its longtime opposition to foreign intervention, especially given its own separatist issues in the far-western region of Xinjiang.

When asked about Ukraine at a regular press briefing on Monday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Qin Gang answered indirectly.

“China has always upheld the principles of diplomacy and the fundamental norms of international relations,” he said.

“At the same time we also take into consideration the history and the current complexities of the Ukrainian issue. It could be said that China’s position is to both maintain principles while also seeking to be realistic.”

Qin also referred to his statement posted on the ministry’s website a day earlier, which said on the one hand that “China has long maintained a principle of non-interference in internal affairs (of other countries), and respects Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

But it also noted that “there are reasons that the Ukrainian situation is what it is today”.

Niu Jun, a professor of international affairs at Peking University, said China wanted to maintain its relationship with Russia yet had strong concerns about foreign intervention.

“It’s all very inconvenient,” he said. “That’s why they came out with a statement nobody can understand.

“What this statement is really saying is, ‘what Russia did was not right and China does not want to support this military invasion’. But China also wants to support Russia, so it came up with excuses” such as Russia’s history with Crimea and Ukraine’s internal situation, he said.

“Yet at the same time they realise this excuse doesn’t hold water, so they also threw in a mention of sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Earlier, Moscow’s foreign ministry said in a statement that minister Sergei Lavrov and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in a phone call noted “broadly coinciding points of view of Russia and China over the situation that has developed in the country and around it”.

Yet China’s account of the conversation was less direct, saying that the two men “thoroughly exchanged views on the matter” and agreed that “appropriately resolving” the situation was important to regional peace and stability.

Russia has found itself internationally isolated over its covert military intervention in Ukraine and on Monday its stocks and currency collapsed amid fears of a prolonged campaign.

The other members of the G8 on Sunday released a statement condemning Russia for violating international law and suspending their participation in a G8 summit set to be held in Sochi in June.

China is not a member of the G8.

China and Russia cooperated on vetoing three UN Security Council resolutions to put pressure on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, although they voted through a resolution this month on allowing in humanitarian aid convoys.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

What Does China Think About Ukraine?  Google

Russian Markets Plunge, Central Bank Moves To Increase Rates

Russian stock market crashed today, declining 13.5% today in a near panic selling. Russian central bank moved swiftly, increasing interest rates by 150bps, the highest hike since 1998 default. The Rubble didn’t fare any better with USDRUB rising to an all time high of 37.

Will this swift market action, gut punch to the Russian economy, threat of sanctions and capital flight be enough to stop Russia or Putin in his tracks in terms of Ukraine?

That wouldn’t be our bet. As a matter of fact, if anything it will make Russia even more determined to go ahead and resolve Ukraine’s situation as they see fit. At the end of the day, Putin doesn’t place as much of an importance on capital markets and the state of the overall economy as the US does.  The more important question is, how will this action/reaction impact the US Market.

It’s very clear. Please check our timing section to find out exact what the market is going to do over the next few weeks.  

RUSSIAN MARKET

Russian markets plunged Monday morning as investors reacted to the prospect of Western-led economic sanctions aimed at punishing president Vladimir Putin for Russian actions in Crimea.

The selloff prompted the Russian central bank to take aggressive action to try to stabilize the markets. As the ruble sank to new lows against the euro and the dollar, the bank raised interest rate by 150 basis points (1.5 percentage points), lifting it to 7 per cent.

Russia’s benchmark stock market index, the Micex, got battered by 13.5 per cent at one point by near panic selling. All of the big names on the index including Gazprom, the state-controlled natural gas company whose pipelines to Western Europe run through Ukraine, fell sharply. Gazprom was down in line with the market.

Yields on Russia’s 10-year sovereign bonds rose as high as 9 per cent, up sharply from Friday’s close of 8.1 per cent, as debt investors apparently took the view that that the Ukraine crisis could escalate even if there have been no clashes between Ukrainian and Russian troops in Crimea, the largely Russian speaking region in Ukraine’s far south which is the home to Russia’s Black Sea naval fleet.

The Russian selloff came as the leaders of the Group of Seven industrialized countries, Canada among them, released a joint statement “condemning the Russian Federations clear violation of sovereignty and territorial integrity in Ukraine.” On Sunday, the G7 countries halted preparatory meetings for the G8 summit scheduled for Sochi, Russia, the host city of the Winter Olympics, in June. Russia is the eighth member of that group.

The strongly worded G7 statement indicates that the Western countries may be on the verge of launching sanctions of some sort against Russia, though no formal plan had been announced by Monday morning. On Sunday, U.S. secretary state John Kerry, who is to travel to the Ukrainian capital Kiev on Tuesday, said the Western countries are “prepared to put sanctions in place, they’re prepared to isolate Russia economically.”

In a note, Kit Juckes of the French bank Société Générale said: “This weekend’s events will be followed by a lot of uncertainty and further risk aversion as a diplomatic solution is sought….wider scale capital flight from Russia must be a risk. Russia is unlikely to back down on its support of the regional government in Crimea. The important of Ukraine as a line in Europe’s energy supply line and as the point were Russia and the European Union meet, makes the idea that either side just backs down hard to imagine, but equally, provides plenty of incentives to work towards a diplomatic solution.”

The Russian sell-off triggered a smaller selloff of equities in Europe, where the FTSE-100 and the Eurofirst 300 indexes fell by more than 1 per cent. Investors sought safety in commodities rose. Brent crude was up 1.6 per cent and gold rallied strongly, gaining 1.8 per cent, taking its value to almost $1.346 (U.S.).

Economists doubted that the Ukraine crisis would trigger a full-blown emerging market crisis because of the small size of the Ukrainian economy. It is worth 0.2 per cent of global gross domestic product. Still, some countries, notably Russia and Poland, have significant trade ties to Ukraine and Russia has the power to make or break Ukraine’s energy supplies. Ukraine depends on Russia for half of its natural gas supplies and about 20 per cent of the gas consumed in the European Union is delivered through pipelines that cross the Ukraine.

The fear among Ukrainians is that Russia will use gas supplies as a geopolitical threat. Russia has reduced out outright eliminated supplies to Russia several times in the last decade over gas pricing and contract disputes.

The Financial Times reported that, over the weekend, Russia signalled that it might use gas exports to apply pressure on the interim government on Kiev. Gazprom, the world’s biggest gas supplier, hinted that it may raise gas prices to Ukraine. In December, Mr. Putin gave Ukraine a big discount on gas supplies as part of a $20-billion bailout package (of which only a few billion dollars has been delivered). The price, however, must be renegotiated every three months.

Russian Markets Plunge, Central Bank Moves To Increase Rates  Google