Shrinking US Trade Deficit

BusinessWeek Writes:  A Shrinking U.S. Trade Deficit—Brought to You by Fracking

fracking invest with alex

Almost entirely on the back of stronger exports, last week the U.S. Commerce Department revised upward its economic growth estimate for the second quarter, from 1.7 to 2.5 percent. Exports from April to June grew at their fastest pace in two years, pushing down the U.S. trade deficit to 2.7 percent of gross domestic product. That’s less than half what it was at its peak of around 6 percent of GDP in late 2005.

Most of the boost in exports came from tangible stuff sold abroad: goods, rather than services. The biggest among them were petroleum products refined from all the crude oil the U.S. is producing—unlocked by fracking. Through June, the U.S. has exported an average of 99 million barrels of petroleum each month over the past year. That’s roughly quadruple the amount the U.S. was exporting a decade ago.

The story of the shrinking U.S. trade deficit is essentially the story of the U.S. oil boom. The last time the U.S. came close to balancing out the trade deficit, at least in terms of its share of GDP, was just after a recession ended in 1991. To feed the broad expansion that followed, U.S. oil imports grew by more than 130 percent over the next 15 years, from 192 million barrels a month in early 1991 to a peak of about 455 million barrels a month in the summer of 2006.

Read the rest of the article here

 

Finally, some good news for a change.  It would be nice to see America become energy independent over the next few decades. Not only is this great from a financial point of view, but a welcome news from a national security perspective. 

I see energy sector as a growth industry over the next few decades. At the same time, investment thesis in this industry is somewhat complicated.  My work clearly shows that the global economy is about to fall into another deep recession or worse. As that happens energy consumption should significantly decrease leading to much lower oil prices.  While international conflicts in the middle east can play a role in destabilizing the market once again and driving prices higher, I wouldn’t worry about it too much. Anything conflict in this area is likely to be short lived.

As fracking technology improves and production yields increase, expect a lot more oil on the world market.  I don’t think I have to tell you what happens when supply increases and demand goes down. A welcome news for the US Economy indeed. Unfortunately, given massive imbalances due to credit finance expansion over the last few decades, it will be of little help to the overall struggling US Economy.

Nevertheless, if you are able to pick winning companies in this sector, they should appreciate significantly. 

If you can, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Plenty of Jobs, but Not For You

Yahoo Finance Writes: Plenty of Job Openings, but Not For You

job-alert-investwithalex

At the end of 2004 the ratio of job openings to workers was about the same as today, but the unemployment rate has moved from a tame 5.4% back then to a painful 7.4% today. So why aren’t job hunters snagging those positions and driving down the unemployment rate, as they did in the past?

The “skills gap”

It seems increasingly likely that many people simply don’t qualify for jobs that are open, which highlights the “skills gap” that seems to be developing as laid-off blue-collar workers compete for jobs in a digital-information economy. Manufacturing has lost nearly 2 million jobs since 2006, for example, and while there’s been a modest recovery during the past two years, the odds of reaching the earlier employment peak seem remote. In construction, the real-estate recovery has brought back some jobs, but there’s still another 2-million-job deficit compared with prerecession levels.

Overall, there are about 4.4. million job openings, according to Labor Dept. data. That works out to 2.8% of the labor force, the same as it was at the end of 2004. With 11.5 million Americans looking for work, you’d think they would quickly grab all the jobs that are open.

Read The Full Article Here

Based on my research I do not see how the employment situation will improve any time soon. If anything,  I believe that unemployment is being under reported throughout government data.  There are just way too many people who are working part time jobs, but who would like to find a full time job.

From a macro economic perspective I do not see anything that would change or reverse this trend. Quite the opposite. With upcoming US Recession, decline in the stock market and continuation of credit defaults, I do not see how the employment situation can improve.

On top of it all you have multiple other trends such as outsourcing and robotics that are taking jobs away.  As such, I expect the employment situation to remain the same in the best case scenario or deteriorate significantly if the US economy slips back into the recessionary environment as I anticipate.  Bottom line is, if you have a full time job……treasure it. 

If you can, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

American Prosperity Now Depends On Attacking Syria?

The Exchange Writes: Hesitation on Syrian Strike Threatens Economic Recovery

america2

President Obama’s vacillation on Syria—first delaying military action and then booting the decision to Congress—poses grave threats to U.S. prosperity.

Imminent military action, especially in the Middle East, instigates fears of shortages and panic in oil markets. Two years ago, oil prices jumped to more than $110 in anticipation of the U.S. action in Libya but then subsided when the worst did not happen to oil supplies.

With mounting evidence that Syria used chemical weapons, oil prices again jumped, and a prolonged debate in Congress could push gasoline above $4.00. That would dent Detroit’s resurgent auto sales, shelve investment decisions across manufacturing, and weigh on already flagging new home sales.

Should the Congress approve military force, Iran could attack Israel or cut back on oil production, permanently pushing up prices. However, once U.S. strikes begin, if those consequences don’t materialize, oil prices should fall back.

The article continues….

The president exacerbated near term fears by first vacillating after Syrian President Assad crossed his red line, and then asking Congress to vote the week of September 9.

Had Obama acted quickly on his own authority, or at least called Congress back into session immediately, the period of uncertainty would have been cut from at least a month to one week.

Extended uncertainty can wreck havoc on investment and consumer spending, and potentially tank the economy.

They behave so badly, despite U.S. protestations, because from Obama is viewed as weak and naïve. By leading from behind internationally and failing to act forcefully against protectionism that harms American workers, he has emboldened those nations’ to give lip service to international rules and then do whatever they please.

Meanwhile, the U.S. recovery drags along at a paltry 2 percent, while China grows at 7.5 percent, and Japan and Germany recover.

If the liberals and Tea Party block U.S. military action, that vote will mark the end of the United States of America as a prosperous nation with the resolve to lead.

Read Full Article Here

So, there you go folks.   This is one of the dumbest things that I have ever read. Apparently American prosperity and economic growth doesn’t depend on innovation, hard work, fiscal discipline and sacrifice that have made this country so great, but now depends on bombing Syria back into the stone age.  

The scary part is, this is normal and legitimate thinking for millions of Americans today. Maybe they are onto something. While at it, perhaps the US should bomb the rest of the countries as well. Just imagine how much economic growth and wealth it will bring to our nation. Plus, it will show everyone once and for all how much resolve we truly have. Crazy!!!  

If you can, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!! 

US Real Estate At A Turning Point. Act Now.

Bloomberg Writes: One Number to Explain a Confusing Housing Recovery

Housing-Decline-225x300

 

Reading the tea leaves in the housing market can be a confusing task.

Today we learned that pending home sales fell in July. Last week the news was that new home starts are down, too. But at the same time, serious delinquencies have hit a five-year low. For those of you who want a big picture view to gauge what’s going on, Trulia has a number for you: 64 percent. That’s how close the housing website says the market is to being back to normal.

To calculate the all-in stat, Trulia’s chief economist, Jed Kolko, combines three main factors: construction of new homes, sales of existing homes, and homes that are delinquent or in foreclosure. He then sees how far those those stats have come from the bottom of the market to a “normal,” prebubble pace. Existing home sales are the closest to normal, up to 94 percent of the original pace. But builders are putting up new homes at less than half the regular rate. Foreclosures and delinquencies, on the other hand, have fallen enough to make up more than half of the ground they lost in the downturn.

The results put the market in what Kolko calls the third phase of the recovery. The first stage started in 2009, when the sales and construction bottomed out. The second stage began in 2012, when home prices reached their low point. And this third phase, Trulia says, began this spring, when tight inventories loosened and mortgage rates started to rise.

At this point, the main issue holding the market back from fully recovering is household formation, or as Kolko puts it: “When young adults finally start moving out of their parents’ homes.” That in turn would spur the construction and sales of new homes and push the market closer to a full recovery.

Listen, there is no confusion at all. This is how the bear market works. First, a significant leg down (2006-2009) in real estate followed by a rebound (2009-now). The rebound acts as a “Trap” of sorts that reassures investors that the market is much better now and is about to recover. When everyone is sucked in, the trap is set and the market (Real Estate Market in this case) begins a massive leg down.

What you are seeing now and why a lot of people are “confused” is the topping out and a reversal process in the real estate market. In simple terms, watch out below. The US Real Estate Market is about to crater big time over the next few years. Don’t be in it, unless you have to. 

If you can, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Should McDonald’s Share Billions in Profit With Fast Food Workers?

Daily Ticker Writes: McDonald’s Should Share Billions in Profits With Fast Food Workers: Labor Organizer

 

When 250,000 people marched on the National Mall 50 years ago they demanded among other things a hike in the minimum wage from $1.25 to $2 an hour. Today thousands of fast food workers are holding a one-day strike in cities across the country, demanding a wage of $15 an hour. That’s equivalent to the $2 an hour protestors called for in 1963, after adjusting for inflation.

Fast-Food-Workers-Strike1

Organizers report that workers have walked off their jobs in 60 U.S. cities today, including New York City where 500 striking workers took over a McDonald’s at 5th Avenue near 34th Street, and the Empire State Building.

In addition to a $15-an-hour wage, protestors want the right to form a union without intimidation or retaliation from their employer.

Kendall Fells, the organizing director of Fast Food Forward, which is overseeing the New York City campaign, tells The Daily Ticker that these workers are not demanding that Congress raise the minimum wage but that the companies that employ them pay a living wage.

Read the rest of the article here:

What is happening to American capitalism? Why does everyone want a handout and/or a bailout. Why should you earn $15/hour when the market is only willing to pay $7.25/hour.  Why should corporations share profits with workers when the shareholders (the real people who took the risk) are left behind?

At least for now, corporations like McDonald’s should not worry about any traction in this movement. At the same time, these companies should

1. Fire striking workers.

2. Replace them with robots. Which is already starting to happen.

As for  the workers in question. Do yourself a favor and get a better skill set, a better job and a better pay. Any excuse that limits you ability to do so, is just that, an excuse.  Stop being lazy, get off your ass and do what you need to do in order to improve your life. 

If you can, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!! 

USA. Becoming a Nation of Part-Timers

part-time-jobs

Reuters writes:  Obamacare, tepid U.S. growth fuel part-time hiring

(Reuters) – U.S. businesses are hiring at a robust rate. The only problem is that three out of four of the nearly 1 million hires this year are part-time and many of the jobs are low-paid.

Faltering economic growth at home and abroad and concern that President Barack Obama’s signature health care law will drive up business costs are behind the wariness about taking on full-time staff, executives at staffing and payroll firms say.

Employers say part-timers offer them flexibility. If the economy picks up, they can quickly offer full-time work. If orders dry up, they know costs are under control. It also helps them to curb costs they might face under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

Yep, exactly. Companies must be crazy to start hiring full time workers in this environment. The only time it would make sense if the economy is surging higher and unemployment is low. Neither one is the case, nor will it be any time soon.

This can all become a less-than-virtuous cycle as new employees, who are mainly in lower wage businesses such as retail and food services, do not have the disposable income to drive demand for goods and services.

Some economists, however, say the surge in reliance on part-time workers will fade as the economy strengthens and businesses gain more certainty over how they will be impacted by Obamacare.

Keep dreaming. The only place this economy is going is down the toilet. You cannot define the law of physics and mathematics forever.  

Executives at several staffing firms told Reuters that the law, which requires employers with 50 or more full-time workers to provide healthcare coverage or incur penalties, was a frequently cited factor in requests for part-time workers. A decision to delay the mandate until 2015 has not made much of a difference in hiring decisions, they added.

“Us and other people are hiring part-time because we don’t know what the costs are going to be to hire full-time,” said Steven Raz, founder of Cornerstone Search Group, a staffing firm in Parsippany, New Jersey. “We are being cautious.”

Everyone knows the costs of hiring full-time right now. That cost is “Too Expensive”

Raz said his company started seeing a rise in part-time positions in late 2012 and the trend gathered steam early this year. He estimates his firm has seen an increase of between 10 percent and 15 percent compared with last year.

Other staffing firms have also noted a shift.

“They have put some of the full-time positions on hold and are hiring part-time employees so they won’t have to pay out the benefits,” said Client Staffing Solutions’ Darin Hovendick. “There is so much uncertainty. It’s really tough to design a budget when you don’t know the final cost involved

Rest of the article here:

The bottom line is this. This Obamacare law is idiotic.  Any law that adds costs and uncertainty to any company in a bear market or downshifting economy is simply stupid. The output is very clear…. 

  • Companies will hire very few  full time workers.
  • Companies will start firing full time workers and replacing them with part time workers.  So, even if you have a stable full time job now (in the private sector), count your lucky stars if you still have one 5-10 years from now.

Simple as that. America is about to become a nation of part timers. Thank you  President Obama. 

Egypt about to stabilize? The stock market says YES.

Business Week Writes: Egypt’s Markets Are Strangely Stable

More than 1,000 people have died in Egypt in the past six days, but you’d never know it to look at the Egyptian stock market. Since June 30, the first day of mass protests that contributed to the downfall of President Mohamed Mursi, the country’s two main stock market indexes are up 12 percent.

Not only that, but the rates the Egyptian government has to pay to attract buyers for its bonds have fallen slightly—a sign that global investors aren’t panicking and demanding higher yields. The yield on one-year government bills today was 12.9 percent, down from 14.9 percent in late June.

Pretty surprising considering that much of the nation is paralyzed by a violent confrontation between the military-backed government and supporters of the deposed Islamist president.

 

This is another perfect example of why most people have a wrong understanding of how the stock market works. Most people believe that news and events drive stock market and individual stock prices up or down.   However, quite the opposite is true.

For example,  if we look at the situation in Egypt today based on the news reports we would assume that Egypt is on the brink of a civil war and as such their stock market values and their currency should be collapsing while their bond yields should be surging. Yet, quite the opposite is true.

Stock prices predict the future, not react to existing news or events.  Typically the values you see today predict a couple of months (sometimes years) into the future.  While news events do have a hand in changing values on short term basis, their overall impact is minuscule.

So, will there be a civil war in Egypt? The stock market sends us a clear answer at least for now….NO AND THINGS ARE ABOUT TO STABILIZE. 

Obama’s Bubble

Bloomberg writes ” Obama Focuses on Risk of New Bubble Undermining Broad Recovery”

 

President Barack Obama, who took office amid the collapse of the last financial bubble, wants to make sure his economic recovery doesn’t generate the next one.

Obama this month spoke four times in five days of the need to avoid what he called “artificial bubbles,” even in an economy that’s growing at just a 1.7 percent rate and where employment and factory usage remain below pre-recession highs.

 “We have to turn the page on the bubble-and-bust mentality that created this mess,” he said in his Aug. 10 weekly radio address.

Obama’s cautionary notes call attention to the risk that the lessons of the financial crisis, which was spawned by a speculator-driven surge in asset values, will be forgotten, widening the income gap and undermining a broad-based recovery.

“Clearly, this is a growing concern both in the administration and at the Fed,” said Adam Posen, a former member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee.

Not Imminent

That may explain why six years after the housing meltdown ignited the worst recession since the 1930s and vaporized $16 trillion in household wealth, bubble reminders are intruding on Obama’s speeches.

“It’s a legitimate concern from an economic perspective,” says Roberto Perli, a partner in Cornerstone Macro, a Washington economic-research firm, and a former Fed official. “But I don’t think it’s motivated by consideration of imminent risk.”

The U.S. recovery, outpacing Europe and Japan, has created 6.7 million jobs since February 2010. Claims (INJCJC) for jobless benefits fell last week to their lowest level in almost six years. And after a two-decade-long borrowing binge, households have pared their debt burden to mid-1980s levels.

Still, growth has been below historical trend for the past four quarters, according to the ChicagoFederal Reserve Bank’s National Activity Index, a blend of 85 indicators measuring employment, production, housing and consumption.

 

Are you F$&*% kidding me?  He wants to make sure his economic recovery doesn’t generate the next bubble”

obama

I don’t know if I should cry or laugh. I am sorry to break it to you Mr. Obama, but as we stand today, as of August of 2013 we are in the biggest financial bubble of all time. EVER. Bigger than 1929, bigger than 2000 and bigger than 2007/8.

That’s what happens when instead of letting defaults and previous imbalances (credit collapse and real estate) work through the system, you put the pedal to the metal and paper everything over with more money created out of thin air. 

The imbalances are so massive at this point in time,  that pain is simply unavoidable. We have never seen anything like that. The result?  Stagnated and a significant US Stock Market Decline into 2016-2018 bottom. Inflation thereafter.  

Homes Are Flying Off The Market & Other Real Estate Stupidity

AMAZING, ARE YOU STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THIS HYPE…….AGAIN?

Housing Bubble Stage 2

Business Week Writes:

The housing site Redfin measures what it calls “selling velocity,” or how briskly homes are finding buyers. The faster homes go under contract, the higher the selling velocity. In the 19 major markets in February, more than a third of houses sold within two weeks of being listed. In California, the velocity is even higher. In San Jose, 63.1 percent of homes sell within two weeks; in San Francisco, 56.8 percent do. Further south, in Los Angeles, Ventura, the Inland Empire, and San Diego, about half of homes went under contract within two weeks. This is the housing equivalent of “flying off the shelves.”

Part of the frenzy comes from a lack of inventory. Buyers have returned to the market while sellers sit on the sidelines, and Redfin says inventory is down 32 percent from last year in those top markets. But there are forces that may increase inventory. Chief among them are rising prices. Bank of America estimates that prices will increase 8 percent this year, stimulating a “positive feedback loop” to help the market pick up even more. “Someone say house party?” the bank’s analysts wrote earlier this month.

Wall Street Journal Writes:

More than half of all homes sold last year and so far in 2013 have been financed without a mortgage, according to an analysis by economists at Goldman Sachs Group.

The analysis estimates that around 20% of all homes sold before the housing crash were “all-cash” sales (or around 30% of sales by dollar volume). But over the past seven years, the all-cash share of sales has more than doubled, increasing by more than 30 percentage points, according to economists Hui Shan, Marty Young and Charlie Himmelberg.

OK, fair enough. So we have one fact straight. As of right now there is an insane amount of speculation in the real estate sector. Anyone who has studied finance and markets knows that cash buyers, foreign investors, begging people to sell you a house is the LAST stage of any mania.

No market goes straight up and down. The first stage of the bear market in the housing market has started in 2007. What you seeing now is the second leg up (rebound) that sucks people back in by making it look like the worst is over and the time to get in is now.

Of course, it is not. What’s next, might you ask? 

A massive 3rd leg down in the real estate market. It will take everyone by surprise and will put a final nail in the coffin that is the real estate market. No one will be able to do anything about it. Not the Fed and not this time. When will it start? Based on the market sentiment above, it should start fairly soon. 

“Someone say house party?” Wait a second, where did I hear that before? Oh yeah, 2001-2007.  Good laugh.