InvestWithAlex.com 

China Wants 7.2% Economic Growth, I Just Want A Ferrari For Christmas

BusinessWeek Writes: China Needs 7.2% GDP Growth for Jobs, Says Premier

 china-bubble-investwithalex.

Thanks to the Workers’ Daily, we now know a little bit more about how Chinese economic growth translates into jobs creation—or at least how top Chinese officials view that crucial equation.

Speaking at a national congress for China’s official trade union two weeks ago, Premier Li Keqiang said that China needs economic growth of at least 7.2 percent in order to ensure adequate employment, the Beijing-based newspaper reported on Nov 4. “The reason why we want to stabilize growth, in the final analysis, is to preserve jobs,” Li said at the union meeting on Oct. 21.

Li also pointed out how important the rest of the world remains for ensuring adequate employment in China. All told, China has some 30 million workers who are directly dependent on China’s export industries, and an additional 100 million serving in supporting industries, Li said. “If exports fall rapidly, it will create an employment problem,” he said.

Read The Rest Of The Article Here

China is going to be an exciting case to watch and study over the next couple of years. It is no doubt understandable that Chinese officials want fast economic growth rate, but we don’t always get what we want.  Particularly, considering my forecast for the US Economy and its financial markets.

At least at this stage, I do not believe that 7.2% economic growth is feasible for China over the long run.  Not even close. The problems stems from the fact that about 25-50% (some claim much more) of Chinese economic growth over the last decade came from capital misallocation and pointless infrastructure projects.  Also known as, empty cities, rail networks, roads to nowhere, etc….  That is one of the reasons Chinese banks are sitting on a time bomb called bad loans that thus far they have been able to ignore.  The problem for China is, there isn’t that much more infrastructure or capital misallocation work left to do and bad loans increasingly becoming a huge problem.  As such, I believe China has no room left for 7.2% economic growth.

Add to that an upcoming global recession (based on my work), subsequent export slowdown and China finds itself sitting on a powder keg of economic trouble. What happens if all of the issues above come home to roost at the same time and instead of 7.2% economic growth China ends up with 2-3% or god forbid even goes negative.  With massive unemployment and certain public unrest  it would be fascinating to see how China comes through.  Will its communist government be able to survive or will Chinas pain be so great that a new political system will be established.

That is why it will be so exciting to watch China over the next few years.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!! 

Warning: Not All Stocks Are Created Equal (Part 4)

catch-a-falling-knife-investwithalex

 Further, there are three more important points that deserve a quick note.

1.  Never try to catch a falling knife

These are known as stocks that have had a huge drop in value over a short period of time.  Sometimes as much as 50-80%.  Imagine for a second that you were considering an investment opportunity only to see it drop 50% over the last 2 days. You can’t believe your eyes. You thought it was a good value before the collapse, yet now the stock is being given away. Literally. You can’t stop salivating and/or thinking how much money you are going to make. STOP.

NEVER invest in falling knifes. Forget about your fundamental analysis or Intrinsic Value calculation. NEVER buy into this situation from both technical and timing perspective. I will describe this further in the timing section, but the chances are high that such stocks will continue to decline even further before experiencing stabilization or a recovery.  Do not worry, in 99% of the time you will have plenty of time to pick up such stocks long after the collapse. Very rarely will you see stocks that have experienced a large drop in value over a short period of time show a “V” shape type of a recovery. It happens, but very rarely.  

I have made this mistakes a number of times in my early days, but will never make it again. As such and as a general rule, avoid falling knifes like your life depends on it.  

2.  Avoid Penny Stocks.

It is very tempting to buy a $0.25 stock in hopes that if it goes to just $5, you will walk away with making 20x on your money. We always hear stories how someone, somewhere has made such a killing and turned their $5,000 into $1 Million within a year.  Clearly understand, this is just hype perpetuated by day traders and people trying to sell you newsletters or the penny stocks themselves.

I don’t know of a single person who has made any real money investing in the penny stocks over an extended period of time. You might get lucky here and there, but the risk associated with investing in penny stocks is just too much for an average person. You don’t see Warren Buffett, George Soros, Jim Rogers and other top fund managers investing in penny stocks and neither should you.

3. Concentration or Diversification

A whole book can be written about pros and cons of both concentration and diversification. Which one is better? Well, that really depends on your personal specification and your risk profile. For me, concentration is a much better way to invest especially if you concentrate only on Rocket Ships and Waking Beasts described above.

The problem is, if you concentrate only on two such categories chances are you will not be able to identify more than 3-10 such stocks (in normal market conditions).  Personally, I like concentration on such stocks as they provide me with the lowest risk and the highest return profile.  Warren Buffett has the same approach.

Yet, it also depends on how you define risk.  Is it more risky to hold 1 stock purchased at a significant discount, a stock you have fully analyzed and know everything about, a stock that you expect to appreciate significantly -OR- is it more risky to hold 30 stocks your don’t really know that well.

One again, that is a personal choice that you would have to make. If you are new to investing, I would recommend you to diversify at first and then slowly move towards concentration as you gain more knowledge and experience.

Summary:  This chapter discusses various attributes of different value stocks by showing you that not all area created equal. It further suggests that you should concentrate on Rocket Ships and Waking Beasts as your primary investments vehicles. Such stocks tend to provide investors with the lowest risk and the highest return profile.  Further, the chapter encourages you to avoid falling knifes and penny stocks.  Finally, it shows that diversification or concentration should be based on your personal preferences and/or risk profile. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!  

Warning: Not All Stocks Are Created Equal (Part 3)

rocketship-investwithalex

Waking Beast:

This is where things begin to get exciting for us. For some reason these stocks are significantly undervalued (selling well below their Intrinsic Value), yet there is nothing necessarily wrong with them. For the most part they might be growing at a good pace, have a good management team and a product that is in demand.  Yet, the market has sold them off.

There might be a number of reasons. The industry itself might be going through a downshift, there might be a bubble elsewhere in the market and it sucked up all the capital, there might be a misconception about the company or they are simply not sexy enough.  

Home builders in early 2000’s would be a perfect example of that. At the time they were selling at huge discounts to their Intrinsic Value even though the housing boom was in full swing. Most of the companies in the industry were selling at 30-75% discount to their Intrinsic Value even though people were literally fighting and standing in lines to get access to their products. Their financial positions and management teams were superb as well.

These are the types of opportunities value investors should be excited about. The company is doing great on every front and is substantially undervalued, yet for some reason the market has discounted it well below what it is worth. Now that you have your margin of safety built into your purchasing price it is highly probable that these stock will appreciate significantly over the next few years or months to fully reflect their Intrinsic Value.

In conclusion, that is exactly what you are looking for.  Highly discounted stocks that are doing very well and are position to appreciate significantly over a short period of time. That is how you minimize your risk while maximizing your gains. Unfortunately, you won’t find many of these stocks out there. When you do, start buying.  

Rocket Ship: 

These stocks won’t come across your desk very often, but when they do you will be able to make huge sums of money. As Warren Buffett so famously says, “Wait for the perfect pitch”. Well, these are your perfect pitches. These stocks are dirt cheap, but they shouldn’t be. It could happen for two reasons.

1. The market has a misconception about the stock and has misprices it significantly. Yet, your fundamental research clearly shows that the market is wrong and the stock should bounce back soon.

2.  There are adverse market forces (like a severe bear market(2007-09)) that drive great companies well below what they should be worth. Eventually the market recovers and you make huge sums of money.

These are the companies that are doing everything right. They have strong financials, a great management teams, a great future, new products, etc… Yet, the stock price was driven down well below Intrinsic Value of the company. If your fundamental analysis confirms that the decline was unjustified and the stock should rebound soon, buy as much as you can. These types of investment opportunities will be your large money makers.  Don’t forget to look for the catalyst as well. Something that would set the climb in motion.

(A word of caution. Just as I talked about in the Dead Man Walking category, make sure you are not missing something. Make sure that your fundamental analysis didn’t miss an important point that the market sees and you don’t. )

To be continued….

Did you enjoy this post? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!! 

Warning: Not All Stocks Are Created Equal (Part 2)

 sleeping Beauty

Hungry Dogs:

These stocks tend to operate in the no men’s land. They are not dead enough to file for bankruptcy, but are not healthy enough to do anything but survive. More likely than not they have significant business problems associated with their business. They are surviving, but barely so. Think of them as street dogs running around looking for food.

They either can’t or do not have enough capital to fix whatever problems they have. They are simply getting by and there is no catalyst on the horizon that would indicate that their luck is about to change. Typically they sell at a significant discount to their Intrinsic Value (or perceived IV). To the tune of 50-80%.

As an example, think of an apparel retailer who has been struggling over the last 5 years. Their brand name has been diminished, their sales are down 4-5% quarter after quarter, there is no new store growth, their management is not changing direction, they are sustaining operating losses, there are no interested parties in buying them out, their financial position is very weak and they barely have enough cash flow to keep their operation going.

The bottom line is, avoid these stocks if there is no clear catalyst that could increase their value in the near future. What kind of a catalyst? As per example above it could be a buyout or a takeover, management change, improvement in merchandise, gradual/consistent improvement in same store sales, new store openings, etc….. 

If no clear catalyst is present, these stocks are likely to remain in their trading range or worse, shift into the Dead Man Walking category. As such, you don’t want to tie up your capital in such stocks even if the margin of safety is over 50% and your valuation work suggest otherwise.  Simply put, these stocks are not going anywhere.

Sleeping Beauty:

Just like a sleeping beauty these stocks are nice to look at, but most of the time they are worthless. Such stocks might look very good in your overall portfolio, but what is the use if they do not contribute to your capital gains. They are certainly better than Hungry Dogs, but not by much.

They are easily identifiable through the following characteristics. The company is growing at a slow rate of about 1-5% per annum. It is financially stable, operating at a profit or a small loss, has enough cash flow to sustain operations for a long time and in no imminent danger from outside factors. Furthermore, the company is making certain changes that seem to be working, but they are not drastic.  The company is selling at a significant discount to its Intrinsic Value (20-70%), but its stock price hasn’t gone anywhere over the last 5 years. Plus, there is no clear catalyst to release the value in the near future.

As an example, such a company might include an agricultural company with a lot of land holdings or a REIT that has a lot of assets, a strong financial position, but no real catalyst for releasing that value to the  shareholders. Their stock prices end up stagnating, sometimes for decades even though investing in them looks good on paper.

In summary, you want to avoid these stocks as well. They might  look good, but all they will do is tie up your capital for a long time without any sort of a real return. Meanwhile you might be losing on other great investment opportunities. The opportunity cost is real and you should definitely take that into consideration when looking at sleeping beauties. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!! 

Warning: Not All Stocks Are Created Equal

Warning: Not All Value Stocks Are Created Equal

 terrible stock

Now that you are well versed in value investing, the concept of margin of safety and how to do Intrinsic Value calculation work, you must be made aware of yet another very important point.  

Not all value stocks with a substantial margin of safety are created equal.

For example, you will have companies selling well below their intrinsic value, but on their way to an eventual bankruptcy. You will have stocks selling very cheaply, but with no chance for a recovery any time soon. You will have stocks that seem to have a large margin of safety, yet it is an illusion. You might have stocks that offer very little margin of safety, yet they are about to take off to the upside like a rocket ship to the moon.  You get the idea, many  outcomes are possible here.

For my own purposes, I like separating Value Stocks into the following easy to remember categories…..

Dead Man Walking:

Initially these stocks might look like a great investment opportunity because they are selling as if they are about to go out of business and/or file for bankruptcy.  On the surface they might be everything a good value investor is looking for. They might selling at a huge discount (80-90%) to their Intrinsic Value and you might be salivating over the opportunity, thinking about how much money you are going to make.

However, stop for a second and take a closer look. It is very rare that a market will present you with such wonderful buying opportunities. It will happen, but very seldom. Most likely than not, you are missing a vital piece of information that the market sees.

You will need to go back and figure out if this a great investment opportunity or if this is a company that will be filling for bankruptcy 6 months from now.  

You will need to be very careful here. You will need to double down on your fundamental research and figure out what you are missing. I guarantee, you are missing something. Once you find that missing part you will need re-evaluate your fundamental research and Intrinsic Value calculation in order to determine if your original conclusion was right.

If you still believe in your original conclusion, I recommend that you buy as much as you can. You might have found one of those once in a life time opportunities.  

At the same time, if the missing piece of information makes a significant negative impact on your previous work you would want to steer clear of this stock.  

Conclusion: Typically you want to avoid these stocks like a plague. They are cheap for a reason. They will stay cheap for a long time or will soon file for bankruptcy. Yet, if your fundamental research continues to confirm your original research you might want to shift this stock into a Rocket Ship category. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!  

Real Estate Meltdown Just Starting

Bloomberg Writes: Pending Sales of Existing Homes Slump by Most in Three Years

 housing crash investwithalex

Fewer Americans than forecast signed contracts to buy previously owned homes in September, the fourth straight month of declines, as rising mortgage rates slowed momentum in the housing market.

The index of pending home sales slumped 5.6 percent, exceeding all estimates in a Bloomberg survey of economists and the biggest drop in more than three years, after a 1.6 percent decrease in August, the National Association of Realtors reported today in Washington. The index fell to the lowest level this year.

Mortgage rates last month reached two-year highs and some homeowners are reluctant to put properties up for sale as they wait for prices to climb, leading to tight inventories. Those forces are pushing some would-be buyers to the sidelines and slowing the pace of recovery in real estate, giving Federal Reserve policy makers reason to delay reducing stimulus when they meet this week.

Read The Rest Of The Article Here

On October 3rd, 2013 I put my foot down and made a gutsy call. I have called for a housing top at the time. You can read the article here. I Am Calling For A Real Estate Top Here

Even though most people have dismissed this forecast I continue to stand by it. As new data points for the real estate market continue to come in, it looks as if I have made the correct and exact call. Yes, certain markets will roll over and start going down a little bit later, but the overall market is starting to look top heavy here. I would expect to continue seeing weakness over the next few quarters until we begin to see clear indications that the real estate market is heading down. At that time a lot of people will freak out and we should see a real inventory spike followed by even lower real estate prices. Of course this cycle will feed on itself for a long time.

Remember, this will be the 3rd leg down for the real estate sector. The first one was the initial decline between 2007 and 2010. Typically, 3rd legs down are longer and steeper. As such one shouldn’t be surprised to see large drops in housing prices over the next few years. As my previous valuation work here showed, overpriced markets like So. Cal should and could go down as much as 50%. 

For now we wait and see as the housing market continues its rolling over process.  

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!  

The Secret To Not Losing Money On Wall Street

CNBC Writes: Dow could rise 10 percent or more in 2014: Siegel

bull investiwthalex

Wharton School professor Jeremy Siegel told CNBC on Monday that the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Dow Jones Global Indexes: .DJI) could rise 10 percent or more in 2014.

That may not be on par with this year’s roaring return but is still historically robust, he said, considering that 2013 has been an “extraordinary year” for stock gains.

“I think they are going to kick the [budget] can down the road a whole year,” Siegel said. “So that’ll be off our plate and that will be a very, very positive factor [for] first-quarter 2014.”

Read The Rest Of The Article

This post is to quickly remind you of two very important facts.

1. Most financial media is worthless. Half the time they don’t even know what they are talking about.  They continuously recycle worthless stories that have no impact on financial markets or individual stocks. As I have said many times before, news do not drive stock prices. I want you to be aware of that.

2. Never listen to teachers when it comes to real world applications. Most of them have the theory down, but that’s it. They do not have what it takes to be on Wall Street. If Mr. Siegel knew anything about the markets he would be managing money and making millions of dollars each year. Instead he teaches. Those who can…do and those who can’t….teach.

Anyway, what kind of garbage is this…..only 10%?  Why not 50% or 100%. Might as well just say that. As a matter of fact, any number will do.  The point I am trying to make and the secret I am sharing is this…..

If you listen financial media and/or take advice from those who do not directly participate in the financial markets, your money and you shall soon be separated.  

Okay, I am done bitching for today. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!  

How To Determine The Intrinsic Value Of Any Company (Part 5)

valuation 3 investwithalex

As you can see the calculation itself is fairly simple and straight forward. What is not easy when it comes to doing Intrinsic Value calculation is doing the fundamental research and figuring out which inputs to use.  A slight deviation in any of the variables above can have a huge impact on your overall Intrinsic Value calculation and your subsequent valuation estimate.   

For example, are you 100% confident in your management team analysis? Are you sure they will be able to turn the company around? Is your estimate of $0.50 EPS in 2015 and a growth rate of 11% thereafter really valid or is it full of holes?  Are you sure the company turns around and what about the competition?

These are the real variables and the real questions that determine the Intrinsic Value. Yet, none of them can be known with 100% certainty. They can be very well researched and you can make very accurate estimates, but they are not exact. In many cases these are guesses at best.  That is the point I want to drive home. You will NEVER have an exact Intrinsic Value, it will always be an estimate.

That is why Margin Of Safety plays such an important role. Let’s say you have worked very hard on determining RadioShacks Intrinsic Value at $10.72. With today’s stock price of $3.75, it gives you a 70% Margin of Safety. That is exactly what you are looking for. This type of a large margin of safety will protect you on the downside should your analysis fail to deliver.

If the management team has failed, if the growth rate or the P/E ratio don’t materialize the chances of this stock going much lower is small. Why? Because it is already selling at 70% discount from what a reasonable fundamental research and valuation work indicate. Should you make a mistake your losses will be limited. Yet, should the company surprise to the upside your return will be significantly higher. A low risk and high return setup.

Can the stock still go to zero? Absolutely. The company can still fail and file for bankruptcy, but if you have done your work right and continue to follow the company on the daily basis you should be well aware of that long before it happens. That is what value investing is all about. Finding these undervalued gems, doing a lot of fundamental research, valuing companies and trying to identify investment opportunities that sell well below their intrinsic value. That in return provides you with a low risk and a high return type of a setup.

Chapter Summary:   If you take anything away from this section of the book, take away the fact that no Intrinsic Value calculation can be exact. Even complex models used by investment banks and Quants yield best guess estimates.  There are just too many unknown variables that depend on future events that comprise the calculation.  

That is why you will be very well served by doing your own fundamental research and concentrating on stocks that provide your with the biggest margin of safety and plenty of upside.  

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!  

How To Determine The Intrinsic Value Of Any Company (Part 4)

calculations valuation investwithale3x

With that said, let’s take a look at our previous  example, RadioShack,  for clarification.

  • Stock Market Price: $3.35 (Oct 18, 2013)
  • Current EPS (Earnings Per Share): $-2.71 (EST $0.50 in 2015)
  • Estimated Future Growth Rate:  11%
  • Weighted Average Cost Of Capital (WACC): 7%
  • Average P/E (Price/Earning) Ratio To Use:  14.8

RadioShack presents us with an interesting real life valuation example that you will run into more than you can imagine. Particularly if you are looking for cheap value oriented stocks.  First, you will notice that last year EPS were negative. 

Well, we cannot perpetuate negative earnings into the future in order to determine Intrinsic Value. Earning have to be positive.  In addition, negative earnings means that you do not have a workable P/E ratio to use in our formula. That is where fundamental analysis comes in so handy.

It is obvious that RadioShack is going through a rough time and its stock price reflects it.  If this continues,  in the not so distant future RadioShack is likely to be filling for bankruptcy.  Yet, if the company is able to turn itself around and grow again, the stock price will appreciate significantly….providing investors with large gains and very little risk.

Let’s assume that your in depth fundamental analysis has yielded the following points (this is done for valuation explanation purposes and NOT  based on the real life analysis of RSH).

  • The new and highly experienced management team has taken over operations.
  • The new management team has put forth a plan that you believe they will be able to execute.
  • Based on your fundamental research you estimate that the company will turn around and earn  EPS $0.50 in 2015.
  • Thereafter the company will grow at 11% per annum(based on your research).
  • After looking at RSH average P/E Ratio and industry averages you feel comfortable with using a P/E ratio of 14.8 for your valuation work.
  • Most importantly, based on your work you believe the company will turn around and prosper.

Let’s take a look at the valuation.  

STEP#1:  Figuring out EPS in 10 years.

  • Formula:  (Annual EPS x Estimated Growth rate^10)
  • RadioShack:  $0.50 x  1.11%^10 = $1.42

Explanation:  If RadioShack grows its EPS at 11% over the next 10 years (after EPS of $0.50 is acheived),  in 2025 its earnings per share will be equal to $1.42

 

STEP #2:  Figuring out stock value at year 10

  • Formula (EPS at year 10 x Average P/E Ratio)
  • RadioShack:  $1.42 x 14.8 = $21.02

Explanation: This means that if EPS and Average P/E ratio holds, the price of RadioShack stock should be $21.02 in the year 2025.

STEP #3:  Discounting future value to determine today’s Intrinsic Value

  • Formula (Future Stock Value/ WACC^10)
  • RadioShack $21.02/(1.07^10)=$21.02/1.9671=$10.72

Explanation: That means the stocks Intrinsic Value today should be is $10.72. With the stock price being $3.35 today, it appears that RadioShack is selling at about 70% discount to its Intrinsic Value. 

To be continued…..

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!  

How To Determine Intrinsic Value Of Any Company (Part 1)

How To Determine Intrinsic Value Of Any Company In 5-10 Minutes
No Harvard MBA Is Required

intrinsic value investwithalex

In the last chapter we took a closer look at how the margin of safety works and what kind of things we should look for in order to make a proper value investment. As previously discussed, one of the most important things to know when figuring out the true margin of safety is the Intrinsic Value (IV) of any given company.

Wikipedia defines Intrinsic Value as the actual value of a company or stock determined through fundamental analysis without reference to its market value. It is also frequently called fundamental value. It is ordinarily calculated by summing the future income generated by the asset, and discounting it to the present value.

Now, there is something very important you must understand.  Determining the IV of any company is arbitrary at best. It could be a highly complex process involving hundreds of excel sheets and data points or it could be a fairly easy process involving a few easy to understand middle school algebra calculations. At the end of the day, neither approach will give you an exact IV of any company. 

Why? Because we are dealing with the unknown. What we are doing when we are determining an IV of any company is taking various existing data points and projecting them well into the future.  In fact, most models call for at least a  5 year discounted cash flow projection to value a company.  The problem is, the future is unknown and in the fast paced business world everything can change on the dime. Making your original IV calculation obsolete.

New products, new technologies, new competition, economic booms and busts, political developments, regulations, etc….. and the list never ends.  How can we make an accurate IV calculation when so many different “unknown” factors can impact your model.  Well, we cannot. 

We can make our best estimates, but we can never achieve a 100% proper IV valuation for any given company. Give 10 different analyst a company to value and they are likely to come up with 10 different answers. Most likely within +/- 20% of each other.  The point I am driving at is this. There is no possible way to achieve perfection when it comes to IV calculation. We are dealing with too many unknowns and future developments. All we can do is estimate.

Let me give you a quick example. Why did Investment Banks who were involved in the Facebook IPO (initial public offering) valued the company at $38 a share?  Did these Investment Banks have a bunch of complex and secret valuation algorithms valuing Facebook before the IPO.  It’s probable, but not likely. You see,  whatever number any such valuation yields would technically be garbage because the future of Facebook is unclear. It is a fast growing tech company, but without a clear path. Everyone is making assumptions. No one knows if Facebook will grow at 20% per annum over the next 10 years or make a series of mistakes that will put it on the path previously walked by MySpace.

As such, everyone can make estimates in order to derive the IV, but in reality no one truly knows. Anyone who claims they can properly determine the IV value of Facebook is simply lying. What ends up happening in a situation like this is investment bankers basically figure out what “the market” is willing to pay and set their IPO price based on that.  

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!