InvestWithAlex.com 

Today’s Market Action Is A Perfect Example Of Why You Should Never Follow The FED

Yesterday, the market soared on the FOMC Minutes indicating slower tightening (if any at all) over the next few years. Just as we have been saying for a long time. Today, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank suggested that the central bank might push its main interest rate even lower or cut the rate it pays banks on excess reserves kept at the U.S. central bank to accelerate economic recovery.

Say what? 

How can you cut something that is already technically ZERO. Since the rates are at zero and the yield curve is flattening as we speak, what are they going to do when the next recession hits? QE 100 Billion, 500 Billion, $1Trillion/month or will they just send everyone a check for $1 Million. And that’s the biggest problem here. The FEDs have already used up their BAZOOKA and there is nothing they can do to prevent, stop or reverse the next recession. As per out mathematical work the next recession/bear market will transpire between 2014-2017. Checkmate. 

unconventional FED

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Today’s Market Action Is A Perfect Example Of Why You Should Never Follow The FED Google

 

Reuters: Fed could cut rates to combat joblessness: Kocherlakota

ROCHESTER, Minnesota (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve should do more to boost both inflation and jobs, a top Fed official said on Tuesday, including possibly pushing its main interest rate even lower or cutting the rate it pays banks on excess reserves kept at the U.S. central bank.

“The key is for us to be able to demonstrate in an effective fashion that we are committed to the recovery,” Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, told reporters after a speech.

The Fed has been winding down its massive bond-buying stimulus since early this year, and Kocherlakota said he has no plans to “relitigate” that decision, which puts the Fed on track to ending bond-buying altogether before the end of the year.

Instead, he said on Tuesday, the Fed must do better on returning the economy more rapidly to full employment and a healthy 2-percent pace of inflation.

The Fed has kept its short-term policy rate between zero and a quarter of a percentage point since December 2008, and Kocherlakota told the Greater Rochester Chamber of Commerce that “we should be thinking about” pushing it even lower.

“It’s really about demonstrating a commitment to stay with the recovery for as long as it takes to get the economy fully recovered,” he said.

The idea of lowering the Fed’s main policy rate, already near zero, or cutting the rate the Fed pays to banks on reserves they keep locked up at the central bank, is outside the mainstream of current Fed policymaking, which currently is focused on providing guidance about what economic conditions could lead to the Fed raising rates.

Kocherlakota, whose lone dissent against the Fed’s policy decision last month marks him as the central bank’s most dovish member, said that guidance falls short.

“We would be better off having more of a collective vision as a committee to what the change in conditions would have to be that would lead us from ending the asset purchase program to raising rates,” he told reporters.

“Unless we communicate as a group about what those conditions are, then we face this instability that two words in a press conference, or two words in a speech or an answer to a Senator can end up moving financial markets participants’ vision of what we are trying to do with policy.”

The Fed last month said it would reduce its monthly bond purchases to $55 billion and would continue to trim the program in measured steps as long as the economy improves as it expects.

After the policy-setting meeting, Fed Chair Janet Yellen briefly roiled markets when she suggested the Fed may start raising rates around “six months” after the bond-buying program ends. She also said that the timing of any rate hike depends on economic conditions, but that message was lost in the immediate aftermath of her answer.

“Unless we communicate more effectively on a collective basis about how conditions are shaping our policy choices, I think we going to continue to face that kind of instability,” Kocherlakota said.

In recent weeks several Fed policymakers have given their views as to when rates ought to start rising, although forecasts from all 16 current policymakers show nearly all expect it sometime next year.

Kocherlakota on Tuesday refused to be drawn about his personal expectations for when rates should rise.

He reiterated his expectation that the U.S. economy will likely grow around 3 percent this year and that unemployment will fall to the “low sixes” by the end of this year, from 6.7 percent now.

“It’s a question of the speed of the recovery, not about whether we are seeing a recovery,” he said.

Inflation, which is running near 1 percent, is “too low” and does not look likely to rise back to the Fed’s 2 percent goal for another four years, Kocherlakota said.

“Low inflation in the United States tells us that resources are being wasted,” he said, including the productive potential of Americans who cannot get jobs because demand for goods and services is so low.

And while unemployment has fallen from the recession-era high of 10 percent, “the U.S. labor market is far from healthy,” he said. Longer term, he said, unemployment should fall to just over 5 percent.

Kocherlakota’s view that the Fed should do more is no secret: The Fed, in his view, should have promised to keep rates near zero until U.S. unemployment falls below 5.5 percent, as long as inflation and financial stability risks are contained.

Instead, the Fed last month dropped the idea of tying low rates to any specific unemployment figure and said it would factor in a wide range of economic measures as it judged the correct timing for raising rates.

Kocherlakota said that the Fed could reword its policy statement show “a stronger commitment to the recovery in terms of being willing to stay accommodative for as long as it takes to see the recovery to completion.”

What Ukrainians Really Think About The US

If you are naive enough to believe the situation in Ukraine has anything to do with freedom and democracy as opposed to expansion of NATO, I have a picture to share with you. Taken in Ukraine over the last 24 hours, this is the reality of what most Ukrainians think about the EU and the US, despite Western Media propaganda to the contrary. Translation:  America and EU, Get Your Hands Off Ukraine. Get Your Mercenaries Out. The US & EU Are Occupiers.  

What Ukranians Think About The US

Do We Need This? It Is Time For America To Stay Out Of This BS. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

What Ukrainians Really Think About The US Google

Some Idiots Never Learn

Recent 3 Billion Euro 4.95% Greek debt offering was oversubscribed to the tune of 6X. Yep, financially bankrupt state known as Greece was able to attracted 20 Billion Euro interest for it’s 3 Billion Euro offering at 4.95%.  Does the return justify the risk? Of course it doesn’t. Greece is still bankrupt as it does not (and will never have) the ability to pay back most of it’s existing loans.

This speaks volumes about today’s fiscal/economic madness. Unfortunately, we live in a world where the proper financial pricing mechanism has been severely distorted by the FED, QE, Interventions, Interest Rate Manipulation and Competitive Currency Debasement. The result? Massive financial bubbles everywhere you look. My only hope is that the bond investors above will lose their shirt without getting any sort of a bailout. Only that will cure their hereditary stupidity.   

some idiots never learn investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Some Idiots Never Learn  Google

 

WSJ Writes: Not to Spoil the Greek Bonds Party, But…

Greece’s first longer-term debt sale since its international bailout four years ago was, if the headline numbers are anything to go on, a screaming success.

Some €20 billion ($27.7 billion) of orders were said to have been placed from 550 investor accounts to scoop a piece of the 4.95% yield up for grabs on the €3 billion five-year deal. A stunning bond-market return by any measure.

But Greece still has its detractors. Here are the views of a few investors who chose to skip the Greek bonds party.

Colm McDonagh, head of emerging-market debt at Insight Investments:

“We passed on the opportunity to participate in the deal as we do not find Greece particularly attractive at these levels. We recognize that Greece has made a lot of progress in recent years, but we are not sure the yield adequately compensates us for the underlying credit quality.”

Martin Harvey, fixed income fund manager at Threadneedle Investments, said he didn’t buy any Greek bonds:

“It is difficult to pin-point fair value for Greek bonds given the specific nature of that market. There is no curve out to 10 years, and it has an extremely low credit rating. If the improving nature and strong performance of other programme countries is used as a reference, then yields should continue to tighten as conditions normalise. For more flexible accounts this may be an attractive prospect. However, the low credit rating and questionable long-term fundamentals will still prohibit more conservative accounts from involvement.”

Mike Riddell, bond fund manager within the retail fixed interest team at M&G Investments:

“Some will cite Greece issuing five-year bonds at less than a 5% yield as marking the end of the euro-zone debt crisis. Others would argue that central bank behaviour in recent years has created colossal moral hazard, where the promise of seemingly infinite liquidity and the perception that almost nothing can be allowed to default has pushed investors to ignore risks and chase returns. Those who are buying into Greece’s new issue will no doubt flag Greece’s primary surplus as a major reason, but while the turnaround in the Greek economy is impressive, it’s worth noting that the IMF forecasts Greece’s gross public debt/GDP ratio to end 2015 north of 170%, and that’s based off what again seem to be fairly heroic growth assumptions. Liquidity is no substitute for solvency, and I don’t believe that Greece is solvent, which makes the new issue an easy one to avoid.”

Bryan Carter, lead fund manager on Acadian Asset Management’s emerging-market debt strategy. He didn’t buy any Greek bonds:

“We looked at it but it came in with a yield well below what we thought was reasonable given the level of risk inherent. You have to look at comparable situations. It’s not just the fact Greece has a junk credit rating, it’s also the fact Greece belongs to a relatively small group of countries for whom acute default risk is at present a concern. Investors are lumping together all of the periphery in one go and they’ve ceased to make a differentiation between Portugal and Greece or between Spain and Greece. There’s a world of difference between the economic potential, their recovery and their sustainability. My guess is that many investors may have exhausted their gains in Spain and Portugal and are looking to rotate into something higher yielding.

Gary Jenkins, credit analyst at LNG Capital. His firm didn’t participate in the deal:

“The vast majority of [outstanding Greek] debt is owed to its European partners and you could argue that the incredibly generous terms of a very low interest rate, a very long maturity just reflect the view that the debt still looks unsustainable and that the terms are indicative of a situation that will only be solved at some stage by a further debt restructuring. Any such event though is probably years away and thus the most likely outcome for this new bond issue is that it will be repaid long before [its international creditors] consider what action to take with their loans.”

24 Hours Before Ukraine Ultimatum Ends. 24 Hours Before The War Starts?

I continue to maintain that this is exactly what Russia is waiting for before going into East Ukraine. Ukraine’s new interim government issued a 24 hour deadline prior to using force against pro-Russia and anti-government protesters who occupy a number of buildings in the city of Donetsk (East Ukraine). With Ukraine’s armed forces now surrounding the city, all we need now is that first spark. So, 24 hour ultimatum, 24 hours to the first spark, 24-48 hours until Russian army crosses the border, 24-48 hours until the start of a massive International shit storm and finally, 24-48 hours until the US Stock Market sells off?  I guess we are about to find out.  

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

24 Hours Before Ukraine Ultimatum Ends. 24 Hours Before The War Starts?  Google

RT Reports: Standoff between gvt, protesters intensifies, 24 hours before Kiev ultimatum ends

With 24 hours until Kiev’s threatened deadline to use force against anti-government protesters occupying buildings in eastern Ukraine, reports emerge of tanks around the city of Donetsk. Several locals were allegedly injured trying to stop the convoy.

An eyewitness confirmed the information about military forces arriving in the city in an interview with RT.

“At about 2pm we received information that military hardware had arrived at our local train station. We went there and saw APCs, military vehicles and troops. The whole town gathered nearby. The soldiers tried to start moving, and the people tried to stop the vehicles,” Lyudmila said.

She also noted the harsh response from the military when the locals attempted to stop them.

“The soldiers twisted the arms of pensioners, there were two men standing there and [the soldiers] drove over their feet [in tanks]. I was pulled back by local coalminers while I tried to stop the vehicles. They didn’t even look at who was in front of them. The men started shouting for them to stop, saying there were girls and women in front of them, but they didn’t care.”

According to a decree signed by coup-imposed leader Aleksandr Turchinov, the local administration building in Donetsk and surrounding territory is an “important government facility, which is a subject to state protection.”

The decree entered into force upon signature and Turchinov has already given Ukraine’s state security service appropriate directions, Itar-Tass reports.

Ukraine’s acting interior minister Arsen Avakov stated earlier on Wednesday that a “special police task force” had already arrived in Donetsk, Lugansk and Kharkov from western regions of Ukraine and was ready to take them under control within 48 – using force, if needed.

The buildings of power structures in the eastern cities of Donetsk and Lugansk remain under control of the protesters. While so far there have been no attempts to recapture the occupied buildings, activists continue building barricades preparing for a possible attack by forces shipped in from other regions of Ukraine.

People are burning bonfires to stay warm in front of the barricades and singing songs to keep up their spirits, with Russian and regional flags waiving in the background. Many women and elderly people are among those on nightwatch in the center of city.

“We will be on duty here all night, because the assault could begin at any moment,” one of the activists told Ria Novosti. Thousands more people are ready to stand up against attackers at the first call of those keeping watch around the perimeter. Several times over the last few days activists assembled to train their response to emergency situations.

 

Barricades around the Donetsk regional administration, seized by protesters (RIA Novosti)

Barricades around the Donetsk regional administration, seized by protesters (RIA Novosti)

 

Activists expect the military operation to take place overnight in Donetsk and Lugansk simultaneously. Local administration in Kharkov was already stormed on Tuesday by armed men without insignia and masked law enforcement officers, after the local police in Kharkov refused to fulfil orders from Kiev.

 

About a hundred fighters from the newly-formed Ukraine’s National Guard reportedly arrived in the airport of Donetsk, the deputy director of a local group called People’s Militia of Donbas, Sergey Tsyplakov, told Ria Novosti.

“In Donetsk airport about a hundred of people from the National Guard have been housed,” Tsyplakov said. “Around a hundred of Right Sector thugs are also in the city, as well as a hundred employees from a private US military company operating under contract with Kiev junta.”

“Totally around 300 professionals or well-trained and motivated fanatics,” Tsyplakov added. “This is a major force, but we are ready to fight.”

 

Image from colonelcassad.livejournal.com

Image from colonelcassad.livejournal.com

 

Earlier in the day, pro-federalization activists in Donetsk blocked two busses carrying unbadged armed men in camouflage near the military commissariat. According to Tsyplakov activists believe they were mercenaries but were unable to identify gunmen as they kept silent and refused to answer any questions.

 

Image from colonelcassad.livejournal.com

Image from colonelcassad.livejournal.com

In the meantime, Ukrainian personnel and armored vehicles were spotted moving closer to the city of Donetsk. Amateur videos posted on YouTube show that locals were trying to stop machinery from progressing further.

Protests against the new government in Kiev have been continuing in eastern Ukraine for weeks now. On Monday, popular assemblies in Donetsk and Kharkov, where local administration headquarters were captured by protesters, declared independence from Ukraine and announced the creation of the independent Donetsk People’s Republic and Kharkov People’s Republic.

Do You Have $500,000 To Waste On Southern California Real Estate? Here Is What You Can Get

As per report from Dr.HousingBubble here is what you can get for $500,000 in So.Cal. Ridiculous. If you would you like to see what awaits our real estate bubble, you can read my full report here Real Estate Collapse 2.0 Why, How & When 

This beautiful 1,208 square feet condo in Culver City. $475,000

culver-city-condo-1

 This magnificent 1,112 square feet shit box in Pasadena for $540,000

pasadena-home-1

Or this palacios 3,802 square feet home in the armpit of So.Cal known as Riverside for $499,000. Actually, this one is not that bad, that is, if you don’t mind spending half of your waking hours in the LA traffic.  

riverside-home

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Do You Have $500,000 To Waste On Southern California Real Estate? Here Is What You Can Get Google

From Our Friends At DoctorHousingBubble.com What does $500,000 buy you in Southern California real estate? A look at Culver City, Pasadena, and Riverside.

We have a large readership from California but also many others that simply enjoy peeking into the mania that is SoCal real estate.  It must appear to an outsider that all Californians ever think about is buying, selling, and flipping real estate.  During certain periods of time the mania gets out of hand and the delusion runs rampant across the L.A. River.  We reach certain stages like today where prices are reaching limits in certain areas and people are no longer clamoring at every open house like a hungry house lusting lemming.  Inventory is picking up as would be expected to start the spring season but also because investors are finally pulling back from their half-decade long binge.   It is useful to look at actual home prices and what a certain amount will buy you in today’s market.  Are prices justified?  For many that question is merely answered by what a buyer is willing to pay.  Can you fault a seller for trying to get as much as possible if a buyer is willing to foot the bill?  The challenge with California real estate is that in order to reach healthy payment levels in certain targeted areas, a large down payment is required to make any economic sense.  I can tell you that investors realize that any property will cash flow as long as the down payment is big enough.  So what does $500,000 buy you in Culver City, Pasadena, and Riverside today?          

 

A look at what half-a-million dollars will buy you in SoCal

People in California have lost all perspective on big sums of money.  It certainly isn’t because incomes in the last decade have suddenly grown at a healthy clip.  No, what has happened is that low rates have allowed for prices to balloon thus making a massively expensive purchase seem cheap.  I’ve talked about folks being able to go with an interest only loan on a $1 million purchase and having their monthly mortgage payment under $2,000 (minus taxes and insurance of course).

Buying decisions are made given a host of life circumstances; marriage, divorce, driving distance to work, schools, etc.  Some of these carry heavier motivating factors than others.  I’m certain that for someone with kids good schools are a priority.  Biologically most parents want the best for their family so that helps to explain some of the financially back breaking moves some people make to buy certain homes in certain areas.  Yet people wanted these things a few years ago as well.  It isn’t like suddenly parents became better today.

With that said, let us go on a house hunting trip with half-a-million dollars in our budget.  Our first stop is Culver City.

culver city condo 1

6050 Canterbury Dr UNIT F223, Culver City, CA 90230

3 beds, 2 baths listed at 1,208 square feet

List price:  $475,000

A condo with 3 bedrooms is a good size for a starting family.  The HOA on this place is listed at $377.  This place appears to have a pending offer on it already.  The last sale on this place occurred in 2004 for $375,000.

Good deal?  I’ll leave that up to you.

Let us head on over to Pasadena to take a look at a home and a condo.

pasadena home 1

1704 Corson St, Pasadena, CA 91106

3 beds, 2 baths listed at 1,112 square feet

List price:  $539,000

The price seems steep especially since the assigned high school isn’t all that great.  The above photo does more justice than the actual location:

pasadena home 1

Your front-yard view is the freeway!  As we have mentioned before only 1 out of 3 families in California can actually afford to buy at today’s prices.  The last sale on this place occurred in 2001 for $205,000.

Good deal?

The next place is a condo in Pasadena.

pasadena condo 1

2386 E Del Mar Blvd UNIT 310, Pasadena, CA 91107

3 beds, 2 baths listed at 1,492 square feet

List price:  $499,000

Both of these condos look like they have some work done on them.  I think the Culver City condo has some better work on the place.  The HOA here is $380.  I crack up when I get e-mails from people in other states when they think this is the annual HOA (no, these are monthly HOA dues).  Is this what you have in mind when you think of $500,000?

Good deal?

Finally it would be helpful to look at something in the Inland Empire.

riverside home

8195 Aliso Ct, Riverside, CA 92508

5 beds, 3 baths listed at 3,802 square feet

List price:  $525,000

This is a giant home.  The last sale took place in 2002 for $407,000.  Interestingly enough, plugging in the 2002 sale price into the CPI calculator gives us almost the current list price.  But one thing people fail to factor in with a big house is big expenses.  Are you ready for $500+ monthly electric bills on those hot days (aka the entire summer and some spring)?  Do you have the energy to clean 3,802 square feet?  The modern family at most will have two kids so what will you do with all those other rooms and space?

Good deal?

Keep in mind that this Riverside property is less than one hour from Orange County and Los Angeles County.  This is merely a sampling of properties that are currently listed on the market today.  The fact that investors are pulling back dramatically should tell you something.  There are likely better, worse, and in between deals out there.  From what I’m seeing, inventory is going up because sales are weak.  People are still house horny.  They just have a beer budget (income) with champagne taste.  This isn’t necessarily happening because suddenly a flood of people are ready to sell.  There is a natural ebb and flow to housing that has completely been circumvented in California.  Some will say that this is simply the new market.  Yet we have discussed that in California, timing absolutely matters.  Boom and bust central folks.  Buying a home is more than simply saying “in the long run, real estate always goes up!”  In the long run we are all dead so simply looking too deep into the future probably doesn’t help with immediate economic decision making especially when it comes to real estate.

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Conspiracy Theory Lives On. And Always Will.

As a money manager, it’s my job to question everything and to dismiss most things I see/hear from the traditional media/government sources as outer nonsense. If I don’t, I will lose money. It is as simple as that. Which brings me to the quick point I would like to make about Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. I wrote about Flight 370 before, Did The US Navy Land Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 At It’s Diego Garcia Base In The Indian Ocean? Here are my follow up questions…… 

How did they find the plane (black box ping) so fast given the size of the Indian Ocean and the depth of the plane (15,000 feet)? Click Here to see how deep it is……hint….it will blow your mind. Even with the projected/estimated flight path at hand, given the size of the search area and the depth of the plane, it would take an outright miracle to find it this fast. I fathom this would be equivalent to finding an individual grain of sand on a 10 miles long stretch of a beach.  In my opinion, the only way to find that plane is to know exactly where it is. The only way to hear that ping is to sit right on top of it. The only way to do that is to, once again, know exactly where that plane had crashed. How did they know? Who crashed it there? Unfortunately we will never know. 

Always question everything….it will make you smarter. Looks like my conclusion here was right on the money. 

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Conspiracy Theory Lives On. And Always Will.  Google

Why Most Market Participants Are Clueless About The Stock Market

The article/video below is a perfect illustration of why most market participants are clueless about the underlying stock market structure and the cyclical/mathematical composition within the market. Of course, it takes decades of incredibly hard work to get there….something that Wall Street is allergic to. Case and point…..

“I think longer-term we’re in a secular bull market very much like we were from 1982 to 2000,” offers Saut in the attached video. “Not a lot of people believe that, especially not the individual investors. They don’t understand how you can have a secular bull when you have dysfunctional government, unemployment higher than what it should be at this stage of a recovery and GDP lower than what it should be.”

Here is something you don’t understand Mr.Saut. Secular bull/bear markets don’t last 9 years as you are proposing (2000-2009 bear). If you study the Dow Jones all the way back to it’s inception on May 10th, 1790 you will find an alternating bull/bear cycle that oscillates 17/18 years(see chart).  You would also learn that every 17/18 Bear leg completes itself with a 2-3 year severe bear market. As such, while you expect a 12% return for the year, I will be taking your clients and your money on the short side. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please Click Here. 

Long Term Dow Structure3

 

 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Why Most Market Participants Are Clueless About The Stock Market  Google

Breakout Writes: Jeff Saut: The bull market will survive a rough spring

When Wall Street strategists insist on hedging their forecasts using time frames it means one of two things. Usually it’s a way of sidestepping accountability and ducking into the standard sales pitch about the stock market historically returning somewhere around 9% or more on an annual basis. While mathematically true that’s neither earth shattering nor actionable.

In the case of Raymond James’ Jeff Saut his emphasis on the big picture is a polite way of avoiding the fact that stocks have been trading horribly for over a month and there’s little to suggest the near-term risk outlook is anything other than ominous.

“I think longer-term we’re in a secular bull market very much like we were from 1982 to 2000,” offers Saut in the attached video. “Not a lot of people believe that, especially not the individual investors. They don’t understand how you can have a secular bull when you have dysfunctional government, unemployment higher than what it should be at this stage of a recovery and GDP lower than what it should be.”

What don’t investors understand? Stocks don’t care about absolute levels. What matters is direction. Saut thinks the economy is improving. In the big picture everything else is noise.

In the more immediate term it’s impossible to ignore the fact that 5 years into Saut’s range of ‘82 to 2000 there was the 1987 crash. Saut isn’t looking for a repeat necessarily but the volatility of the tape suggests traders have almost no confidence in the market at this juncture. Markets put in an attractive bounce on Wednesday but those under the impression that a $7 pop in Facebook (FB), to take one example, is healthy after shares fell 20-points in a straight line need to keep in mind the wild ride isn’t over yet.

For the year Saut thinks the S&P 500 (^GSPC) can post above average gains of 10-12%. For the next 3 months his forecast is for some rocking and rolling. Review your portfolio to fit your personal tolerance for pain

Chinese Protests Escalate. Full On Revolution Next?

Despite having overwhelming control, the Chinese Communist Party is starting to worry. More and more of their folk are protesting in the streets, picketing government offices and besieging factory floors. While most of the protests (871 mass incidents over the last 10 years) concentrate on labor and land grab disputes, we believe that is about to change. As reported here earlier, China is facing dual and massive real estate and credit bubbles.

We continue to believe that the eventual collapse in such bubbles will result in millions of Chinese families losing everything, including their jobs.  Further, we believe that such economic developments will force millions of Chinese to hit the streets to protest their government. We saw some early signs of that when Chinese developers started to cut prices a few years ago (right before the massive credit pump instigated by the Chinese government).

Will the Chinese Communist Party be able to survive a massive protest and/or disobedience or will it collapse just like the Soviet Union did? We can’t wait to see what happens. What do you guys think?

Chinese Protests Investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Chinese Protests Escalate. Full On Revolution Next? Google

BusinessWeek Writes: What Drives China’s Protest Boom? Labor Disputes and Land Grabs

What are the main reasons Chinese take to the streets, picket government offices, and besiege factory gates? A recent report by the Chinese Academy of Social Science provides some answers on why people protest, a question that keeps China’s party officials awake at night.

Most protests erupt over labor disputes and land grabs, according to the Annual Report on China’s Rule of Law No 12 (2014), also known as the Blue Book of Rule of Law. The analysis reviewed 871 “mass incidents”—protests involving more than 100 people—carried out by more than 2.2 million people from January 2000 through September of last year, as the official China Daily reported.

As China’s leaders push for faster urbanization, with plans to convert hundreds of millions more farmers into city dwellers, land disputes are a growing problem likely to get even bigger. “In land acquisitions and forced demolitions, for example, many officials often overlook public interest,” Shan Guangnai of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences told the official newspaper. 

The majority of the protests involved fewer than 1,000 people. Still, almost one-third of the incidents included between 1,000 and 10,0000 people, and 10 megaprotests involved more than 10,000 people demonstrating en masse. Of the largest, half were protesting pollution issues. The two other main causes were traffic accidents and conflicts involving China’s many ethnic groups, which include Tibetans, Muslim Uighurs, and Mongolians.

Almost one-half of the protests were directed at government, with disputes due to problems with law enforcement, land acquisitions, and forced demolitions involving local officials, plus various other rights issues. The remainder of the demonstrations focused on conflicts with enterprises, landlords, schools, and village committees. The large majority of protests—about four-fifths—were organized rather than spontaneous, and 36 incidents resulted in a total of 79 deaths.

The report also showed that protests occur most often in more-developed regions, including eastern and southern China, with Guangdong province alone accounting for about 30 percent. And the number of incidents is rising each year.

Stock Market Update. April 9th, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com

daily chart April 9 2014

A strong up day with the Dow Jones up 181 points (1.11%) and the Nasdaq up 71 points (1.72%)

While most of today’s rally was caused by the FOMC Minutes, I give very little weight to such fundamental factors. As explained earlier on this blog, we believe most market participates do not have the correct fundamental macroeconomic framework or understanding associated with today’s market environment.  Certainty not the cyclical market structure.  In fact, we believe the market (particularly the Nasdaq) continues it’s bounce from an oversold position. When the bounce completes itself over the next few trading days, we would expect the market to XXXX

Further, our mathematical and timing work continues to show that the bear market of 2014-2017 is just around the corner. When it starts, it should very quickly retrace most of the gains derived over the last two years (at least). Those who are positioned properly should be rewarded handsomely. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s subsequent internal composition, please Click Here. 

(***Please Note: Due to my obligations to my Subscribers I am unable to provide you with more exact forecasts here. In fact, I am being “Wishy Washy” at best with my FREE daily updates here. If you would be interested in exact forecasts, dates, times and precise daily coverage, please Click Here).  

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Stock Market Update. April 9th, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com Google

Investment Grin Of The Day

An investment firm is hiring mathematicians. After the first round of interviews, three hopeful recent graduates – a pure mathematician, an applied mathematician, and a graduate in mathematical finance – are asked what starting salary they are expecting.
The pure mathematician: “Would $30, 000 be too much?”

The applied mathematician: “I think $60, 000 would be OK.”

The math finance person: “What about $300, 000?”

The personnel officer is flabberghasted: “Do you know that we have a graduate in pure mathematics who is willing to do the same work for a tenth of what you are demanding!?”

“Well, I thought of $135, 000 for me, $135, 000 for you – and $30, 000 for the pure mathematician who will do the work.”