Known as Wall Street’s dirty little secret and brought into the main street view by 60 Minutes on Sunday, high frequency era might be coming to an end. With recent FBI investigations into the practice and New York’s Attorney General Eric Schneiderman looking into lawsuits, it is just a matter of time before most high frequency trading operations are rendered unprofitable. Either through legal or regulatory channels. It’s about time.Now, what will the next chapter in Wall Street scamming the main street saga be? Perhaps mortgage backed IPOs?
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
Federal agents are investigating whether high-frequency trading firms violate U.S. laws by acting on nonpublic information to gain an edge over competitors.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s inquiry stems from a multiyear crackdown on insider trading, which has led to at least 79 convictions of hedge-fund traders and others. Agents are examining, for example, whether traders abuse information to act ahead of orders by institutional investors, according to an FBI spokesman. Even trades based on computer algorithms could amount to wire fraud, securities fraud or insider trading.
The FBI joins a roster of authorities examining high-frequency trading, in which firms typically use super-fast computers to post and cancel orders at rates measured in thousandths or even millionths of a second to capture price discrepancies.New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman opened a broad investigation into whether U.S. stock exchanges and alternative venues give such traders improper advantages.
Regulators have focused for years on whether high-speed trading hurts market stability. More recent law enforcement investigations are shifting the focus to unfair practices and possible criminal activity.
Critics including some investors and regulators have said such trading, which captured the spotlight in the May 2010 flash crash that shook U.S. equities, serves little purpose, may distort the market and may leave individual shareholders at a disadvantage.
Services Scrutinized
Schneiderman is examining the sale of products and services that offer faster access to data and richer information on trades than what’s typically available to the public. Wall Street banks and rapid-fire trading firms pay thousands of dollars a month for these services from firms including Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. and IntercontinentalExchange Group Inc.’s New York Stock Exchange.
Robert Madden, a spokesman for Nasdaq, and Eric Ryan at the NYSE, declined to comment on the FBI’s inquiry. Jim Margolin, a spokesman for Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, declined to comment when asked if the office was looking at high-frequency trading.
The FBI began focusing on high-frequency traders last year, before Schneiderman disclosed his inquiry this month. Market regulators have asked for years whether new restrictions on rapid-fire trading were needed.
Daniel Hawke, the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s market-abuse unit, said in 2012 that the agency was examining practices such as co-location and rebates that exchanges pay to spur transactions. Last year, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced a review of speed trading and sought industry input.
Federal prosecutors have scored dozens of insider trading convictions in recent years, including several linked to SAC Capital Advisors LP, the hedge-fund firm run by Steven A. Cohen that is changing its name to Point72.
SAC agreed in November to pay a record $1.8 billion and plead guilty to securities fraud to settle allegations of insider trading. As part of the settlement, Cohen agreed to close SAC’s investment advisory business.
There is no such thing as a sure bet in the market. Yet, it seems as if the WSJ found it. Simply go long in April and you are golden. The S&P 500 has averaged a 1.7% gain in April over the past 40 years, the best-performing month of the year, according to Schaeffer’s Investment Research. Yep, it’s that simple.
The reality is, of course, a little bit different. While seasonality in the stock market does exist, it has nothing to do with “Monthly” time frames and has everything to do with cyclical composition of the market. One cannot safely assume that the stock market will move up or down based on what month it is. It just doesn’t work that way. It is the cyclical composition (some spanning for days while other spanning for decades) that determines what the stock market will do in the month of April. Simply put, anyone who follows such an idiotic WSJ premise and analysis will have their head handed to them.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
The S&P 500 has averaged a 1.7% gain in April over the past 40 years, the best-performing month of the year, according to Schaeffer’s Investment Research. The only other months that have averaged at least 1% gains are January, March, October and December. The S&P 500 rose 1.8% last April, which at the time was the market’s sixth straight monthly gain.
With the S&P 500 gaining 1.3% throughout the first three months of the year and sitting just 0.3% off last month’s highs, the question once again is just how much more momentum is behind the recent gains. Blindly assuming the rally will continue because it’s April might be a mistake, as slow earnings growth and the dialing back of stimulus from the Federal Reserve could crimp this month’s performance.
Once again, central-bank policy played a key role in the market’s recent performance. Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen gave investors a fit at last month’s news conference when she signaled that rate increases might come sooner and be a touch more aggressive than originally expected.
“The Fed moved the conversation from stimulus ending to increasing interest rates, but after an initial negative impact the market accepted it,” said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices, while noting an actual rate increase is seen as being at least a year away.
The focus now shifts to upcoming economic data and the start of earnings season next week.
Friday brings the March jobs report. The hope is this report will be free from any wintry-weather distortions that have hurt the economy over the past few months. Earnings, however, are unlikely to escape the impact of the bitter cold and snowy weather.
S&P 500 companies are expected to post a profit decline of 0.6% in the first quarter, according to FactSet, which would be the first drop in earnings since the third quarter of 2012. At the same time, many of these companies have issued profit warnings in near record numbers. Some 93 companies have warned that profits will fall short of forecasts, the second-highest overall number of companies issuing negative guidance on record, according to FactSet’s count.
A poor earnings season could keep a lid on this year’s rally.
“In the grand scheme of things and after such a powerful rally last year, the market really needs continued good news to go further from here,” said Wasif Latif, who helps manage $50 billion in assets as vice president of equity investments at USAA in San Antonio.
“The challenge is that we’re still in the backdrop of an overall anemic economic environment,” he added. “The market really needs that next level in the form of improving guidance of future earnings and revenue growth. We’re just not there yet.”
As the calendar turns to April, at least the stock bulls still have history on their side.
A strong up day with the Dow Jones up 135 points (0.82%) and the Nasdaq up 43 points (1.04%)
In Friday’s update I suggested that the DOW/Nasdaq are set for a significant bounce over the next few trading days. Further, the market continues to perform just as per our forecast (available in premium section). While consistent up days, all time highs and positive news continue, this never ending up drive higher is in the final stages of it’s development. If fact, this latest surge higher offers people with the perfect opportunity to liquidate most (if not all) of their long positions.
The bear market of 2014-2017 will start within a relatively short time window and when it does, it will quickly retrace most of the gains since February 5th low. If you would be interested in knowing exactly when this bear market will start (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please Click Here.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
After expelling most of the Jews over 500 years ago, Spain now wants them back.Why? Exactly for the same reasons they were expelled back in 1492 in the first place…..to bring talent, ideas and money to Spanish economy. Upon hearing the news, Wall Street Masters of the Universe offered Spain to buy high yield grade AAA Mortgage Back Securities while loading up on short-term call options for the DOW 50,000. Assuring Spain that such steps will bring Spain out of it’s financial crisis mush sooner than by simply sending over a few Jews. It was reported that Spain’s Prime Minister couldn’t contain his excitement after transferring another $50 Billion into Spain’s Goldman Sachs account to execute this exciting trade.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
There’s a whiff of desperation in Spain’s latest plan to naturalize descendants of the Jews the country’s rulers expelled back in 1492.
The initiative — advertised as righting a historic wrong — began seven years ago, and since then Spain has granted citizenship to 746 Sephardic Jews, mostly from Venezuela and Turkey. A proposed billis meant to ease the citizenship process for 3.5 million descendants, many of them living in Latin America and Israel.
The question is why now? Spain is barely clawing its way back from the deepest economic crisis in almost half a century. Unemployment hovers around 26 percent — youth joblessness is an eye-watering 50 percent — and the state has cut health, education and other entitlements. Plus, frustrated, unemployed Spaniards aren’t toowelcoming of foreigners.
In reality, Spain’s immigration bill is the latest attempt to attract talent, ideas and money to an economy in need of all three. It’s almost poetic justice. After all, what is worse: kicking out Jewish people because of their faith, or calling them back more than 500 years later because of the notion — prevalent in Spain — that Jews are educated, industrious and excel at business? Spanish politicians would do well to explain why such a spirit of historic justice doesn’t extend to the descendants of the almost 300,000 Muslims Spain cast out in 1609.
In fairness, the bill is well-intentioned. For starters, it means Spain recognizes the need to shake up things and bring in new blood. The bill would also allow Jewish beneficiaries to keep other citizenships instead of asking them to renounce them. This suggests Spanish politicians are finally grasping that openness to national diversity makes countries such as the U.S. powerful magnets for international talent. Moreover, immigrants tend to have a solid work ethic; Spain’s Chinese community, for example, has thrived amid the country’s economic woes.
The immigration bill also helps account for why many Brazilians seem eager these days to explore their Jewish ancestry and obtain a Spanish passport even though Brazil’s economic troubles are arguably more manageable than Spain’s. It is no secret that immigration has flowed the other way in recent years, with a generation of young Spaniards heading to the U.S. and Latin America looking for a better life.
If Spain wants immigrants to help overcome its economic difficulties it could do much more. True, Spain already began cutting taxes to stimulate growth. But it should tailor and promote more attractive tax advantages for those who create companies and generate new jobs. Spain might also learn something from Chile — it’s former colony — where the government has offered money and tax breaks totechnology startups willing to set up shop in Santiago.
Getting a country back on its feet takes more than a passport, a handshake and talk of redemption. If Spain is really so intent on making amends for the wrongs it committed so long ago, there’s a whole region called Latin America that wants its gold back.
We have already discussed, a number of times before, why today’s IPO market bubble is reminiscent of the 2000 Nasdaq top (search IPO on the right side). The question becomes, when will this IPO bubble pop?
This is rather easy. As soon as the stock market breaks down and begins it’s bear market. Based on our timing and mathematical work that time will arrive shortly. Once the market breaks below 15,000, most of the animal spirits associated with “hot yet highly speculative” IPOs will go out the window. Just as it should. If you would be interested in learning when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please Click Here.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
This has been a record year so far for European stock market listings – traditionally a sign that a region’s economy has returned to health.
The average size of fundraisings in Europe this year so far is $259 million, the highest on record, according to Dealogic. With the region’s economy still growing at a relatively slow rate, this is not just about greater confidence in the economy.
“First, there was a strong amount of cash available for investors in equities,” Klaus Hessberger, co-head of ECM EMEA at JPMorgan, told CNBC. He advised on the $6.9 billion sale of UK government shares in Lloyds Banking Group, the biggest deal in the region so far in 2014.
“Second, IPOs need some preparation time, usually more than six months – so this was a reflection of a positive market from summer onwards. Third, U.S. equity money is still coming into Europe because of the continued lower interest rate environment and fourth, there was also cash raised for M&A.”
Plenty of action is also driven by private equity groups “clearing out aging investments from their portfolios,” as Maria Pinelli, Ernst & Young’s global vice-chair of strategic growth markets, pointed out. She thinks the first half of 2014 at least will continue to be a good year for the IPO market.
View gallery
Jin Lee | Bloomberg | Getty Images
With all the cheap money in the system, bankers believe the IPO boom has further to run. There is pent-up demand and a number of appetizing companies waiting to come to the markets.
“There is still some way to go to capture all the liquidity,” as Hessberger said.
In Europe, Goldman Sachs is topping the leaderboard of advisors in terms of value of IPO deals completed, with a market share of 13.6 percent in this year’s deals so far, followed by JPMorgan (9.7 percent) and Deutsche Bank (9.4 percent).
However, it isn’t quite 2006 all over again at investment banks.
There are still risks to continued outperformance, such as worse economic performance, as Hessberger pointed out.
Some of the more recent listings have been less well received, such as Candy Crush game maker King Digital, whose shares fell by 16 percent on their debut. And the most recent Lloyds sale featured a greater discount than the last tranche sold by the UK government.
There are also suggestions that some banks are having to resort to different measures to get in on IPOs, such as observing stricter guidelines against working with particular clients’ competitors and even waiving fees to be listed as part of deals they didn’t work on for existing clients.
The M&A and debt markets have not recovered in the same way. Revenues for these kind of deals are down 6 percent for M&A, and 22 percent for debt capital markets globally, according to Dealogic figures.
While there are a number of big money deals like the Time Warner Cable purchase pushing up M&A figures, the actual number of deals is down 14% compared to 2013 at this point, making 2014 the slowest year-to-date period by number of deals since 2003, according to Thomson Reuters data.
Nice piece of garbage reporting Bloomberg. Do National Association of Realtors shills have you on their speed dial? According to the NAR and most real estate agents we are about to experience a massive surge in home sales due to weather related constrained demand.
“There aren’t many people who want to drive around looking for homes in a blizzard, and there aren’t many sellers who can put their homes on the market unless they have some place to move to,” Maki said. “We’ve seen sales take a hit so far, lagging where they usually are, but we think the next few months will make up for it.”
Fact or fiction?
A bunch of nonsense is more like it. I have already pocked a number of holes in their weather related argument in my previous posts, but only time will prove me right. The reality is quite different. The real estate market is now done with it’s dead cat bounce.That was evident in last weeks report where according to the National Association of Realtors, pending home sales index “unexpectedly” fell 0.8% in February and 10.5% from a year ago level. If you would like to get a complete real estate report and learn exactly what will happen over the next few years, please read my comprehensive report. Real Estate Collapse 2.0 Why, How & When
In short, the real estate market will decline over the next 3-4 years in conjunction with the US Economy and financial markets. When it is all said and done, I wouldn’t be surprised to see real estate prices down 30-50% from today’s levels in select markets. If you would be interested in learning when the bear market of 2014 will start (to the day) so you can time the real estate market with more precision, please Click Here.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
Donna Cicerone and her husband Paul want to put their three-bedroom home in Milton, Massachusetts, on the market. First, they have to find a house to buy.
The Cicerones live in the Boston area, where all but three weekends this year have had snow, sleet or rain. Bad weather has forced them to cancel house-hunting plans half a dozen times, they said. When they have found a house they liked amid a limited supply of properties, they’ve been outbid.
“The moment we sign a contract to buy, we’re putting our house on the market,” said Donna Cicerone. “We feel like we’re missing an opportunity because everyone says there are lots of buyers, but there’s nothing we can do.”
Frustrated shoppers and would-be sellers like the Cicerones are setting the pace for the housing market’s spring selling season, the March through June period when more than half of U.S. home sales take place. The market’s getting a late start this year because so much of the country has been in the grips of bad weather, said Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist for Barclays PLC in New York.
“There aren’t many people who want to drive around looking for homes in a blizzard, and there aren’t many sellers who can put their homes on the market unless they have some place to move to,” Maki said. “We’ve seen sales take a hit so far, lagging where they usually are, but we think the next few months will make up for it.”
Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg
Potential home buyers view a model home for sale. Home sales declined in February to…Read More
Sales Fell
Home sales declined in February to the lowest level since mid-2012, according to the National Association of Realtors. The number of contracts signed with the intention of purchasing properties fell that month to the lowest since 2011, according to the Realtors’ group. While the numbers are seasonally adjusted, they can be influenced by unexpected events such as unusual weather.
Applications for mortgages to purchase homes dropped in February to the lowest since 1995, according to an index from the Mortgage Bankers Association that also is seasonally adjusted. By mid-March, the gauge regained about 12 percent from that low, while remaining about 17 percent below the level it was during the same week in 2013.
Most of the sales blocked by bad weather will happen in the next few months, Maki said. Housing forecasters Fannie Mae and the Mortgage Bankers Association predict 2014 home sales will be
‘Exaggerated Bounce’
“Because we’ve had a late start to sales, we expect a bit of an exaggerated seasonal bounce,” said Maki.
Sales of existing homes probably will rise to 5.14 million in 2014, up from last year’s 5.07 million, according to the mortgage bankers group. Mortgage lending for purchases probably will total $661 billion, near last year’s $652 billion, the trade group said.
Like many buyers, the Cicerones are eager to purchase a house so they can lock a mortgage rate before borrowing costs rise. The average U.S. rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 4.4 percent last week. A year earlier, it was 3.57 percent. By the end of 2014, the average rate probably will be about 4.6 percent, said Fannie Mae.
“We’re ready to pounce when we find the right house,” said Cicerone, 48. “We want to put our home on the market to catch all the buyers nervous about mortgage rates, and we want to find a house as fast as we can so we can lock in a good rate too.”
They may get some cooperation from the weather in April. Below-normal temperatures will give way to more seasonal weather in the eastern U.S. next week, according to Matt Rogers, president of Commodity Weather Group LLC in Bethesda, Maryland. The December through February period was the coldest in four years.
Fed Tapering
Borrowing costs have risen as the Federal Reserve continues tapering stimulus efforts that have kept interest rates low. Policy makers cut monthly bond purchases to $55 billion this month, from $85 billion last year. Fed Chair Janet Yellen said the program could end this fall and that the benchmark interest rate, which has been close to zero since 2008, may rise six months after that.
Tighter lending also is hurting the market, said Michael Hanson, a former Federal Reserve economist now working for Bank of America Corp. in New York. In January, the Fed issued a report showing 1.4 percent of banks had raised mortgage standards, the first increase since April 2012.
“We need more first-time buyers in the market so they can purchase the homes of people who want to move up,” Hanson said. “We won’t see a normal real estate market until they are included, and they are the ones most affected when lenders tighten standards.”
First-time buyers accounted for 28 percent of all purchases in February, up from 26 percent in January that was the lowest in data going back to October 2008, according to the National Association of Realtors.
Supply Differences
The supply of homes for sale is bigger than last year, according to the National Association of Realtors. At the current sales pace, it would take 5.2 months to sell the properties on the marketin February, compared with 4.6 months a year earlier.
The markets in certain areas, such as Boston, Denver, and Houston, are leaner than during the 2013 Spring selling season. In Boston and Boulder, Colorado, the number of homes for sale in February was down about 30 percent from a year ago, according to Zillow Inc. in Seattle. In Houston, Dallas and Denver, the contraction is about 20 percent. The metropolitan New York and Seattle areas were up 1 percent.
That has made extra work for home-loan brokers such as Jonathan Sexton, a vice president at NE Moves Mortgage LLC’s office in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Each time people make an offer on a house, their mortgage broker prepares a letter showing they are pre-qualified for the amount of the bid. When supply shortages cause bidding wars, those letters are in greater demand.
‘Low Success’
“So far this year, I’ve seen an inordinately low success rate for bids because the supply of properties is so limited,” he said. “I wish I got paid in pre-approval letters instead of closed loans.”
Sales in the Boston area and other parts of the country likely will pick up speed as the market goes into April and May, said Bank of America’s Hanson.
“The housing market, like the rest of the economy, is on a gradual rec
Is it possible that your entire life is governed by the same cyclical forces that operate in the stock market? Is it possible that your life tends to oscillate, grow, fall, collapse, surge higher and otherwise flat-line (move sideways) just as the stock market or individual stocks do? If so, can your life be predicted?
A contrary view to most of Western media and governments propaganda machine. A must read for any red blooded and chest beating American. With American “defense” budget pushing closer $1 Trillion mark (higher than the next 10 countries combined), the US Industrial Military complex needs another enemy to justify the expenditure. The bigger the enemy the better. Of course, China and Russia become our primary targets.
Which begs the question, were the miscalculations in Ukraine intentional or unintentional?
Of course they were intentional. If you don’t think that CIA or Pentagon analyst knew how Russia would react, I have some Notell and Pets.com stock to sell you. Unfortunately, there is only one way forward for the US Politicians and the Military Industrial complex. To escalate things for the benefit of profit. What the idiots don’t understand is what this will lead to. I have already outlined the timing and exactly what will happen in my comprehensive report Nuclear World War 3 Is Coming Soon.When, How & Why
It is downright scary how things are beginning to line up.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
As US spending on defense reaches $1 trillion a year and defense giants such as Boeing gain increased lobbying power, the US must justify this money by creating tangible enemies around the world, political analyst Patrick Hennigsen told RT.
RT:Why do some people in America say they were surprised at the speed Russia moved on Crimea?
Patrick Hennigsen: Personally I tend to be skeptical about press briefings or PR balloons coming out of Washington, especially around a crisis like this. Unless of course they were completely asleep at the wheel, or were totally incompetent, I find it hard to believe that they couldn’t have predicted at least a Crimea referendum result because of the crisis in Kiev.
So, even I in February said that Ukraine may be partitioned into two or three parts as a result of this crisis. But experienced intelligence analysts in the State Department or the CIA would have war-gamed five or six different possibilities, or any reaction as a result of an action taken with regime change in Kiev.
So it’s quite unbelievable that this would have quote, unquote, taken them by surprise. But this suits the priorities of the Pentagon in Washington, being able to talk up military confrontation in order to increase spending on defense organizations, to increase contracts which are going to be reviewed this year with the Pentagon and other defense organizations.
So it doesn’t surprise me. Even though they’ve made this statement, it’s quite disingenuous in my opinion.
RT:Has the US administration miscalculated? What and who are influencing America’s foreign policy with regard to Russia?
PH: I think throughout recent history, at least if not the whole of the last 30 to 40 years, the United States will never admit that it’s made a mistake or that any of the policies that it instituted have had a negative effect on the world. So that doesn’t surprise me, but certainly there are a lot of opportunists who stand to gain incredibly financially as a result of the crisis, a confrontation, a reigniting of the Cold War with Russia.
Currently the new United States is looking for an enemy, a major enemy, which they need to justify upwards of $1 trillion a year in total if you look at it in defense spending. And these are contracts that belong to corporations that are very powerful, as lobbies in Washington DC they hold incredible influence over political leadership, that is the system right now in the United States and Washington DC and so it shouldn’t surprise anybody that the opportunists are now jumping on board in the media and the corporate lobbies that really determine the agendas, the foreign policy agendas that are laid out by our political leadership in Washington DC.
People attend celebrations on the main square of the Crimean city of Simferopol March 21, 2014. (Reuters)
‘Decision to join Russia was a no-brainer for Crimea’
RT:Why do you think Crimean people voted in such large numbers to become part of Russia?
PH: Well, if you put aside general anti-Russian propaganda that is running rife right now regarding Russia being a “corrupt country,” a “dictatorship,” you look at the international organizations that have been monitoring elections in Russia and have commented on how transparent they are, how well organized they are. From a Crimean population’s stand point it’s a no-brainer. If you put yourself in their position you’re looking north and you’re seeing the total destabilization and the collapse of rule, the collapse of government. A complete economic collapse in Ukraine as a result of what happened in Kiev. So hence you have a huge voter turnout, an incredible landside of a majority.
And any person in the world would make a similar decision. If Northern Ireland had to make a decision because the government in London collapsed, neo-fascists took over at gunpoint in London, and people of Northern Ireland could have a referendum, of course they would join the south; they would join the Republic of Ireland for their own personal stability, for their own safety. So it’s not that big of a stretch when you look at it from a larger perspective.
RT:How can the fact be explained that the transition of the military in Crimea went so smooth? As you know, just a few Crimean soldiers decided to return to Kiev, while others joined the Russian army.
PH: The transition militarily in Crimea shouldn’t surprise anybody, because between the Ukraine and Russia you have over two decades of cooperation, military cooperation from the top brass, down to the soldiers who were doing drills together and maneuvers together for 20 years and even further back when you count the time of the Soviet Union. So Russia’s military presence goes back centuries in the Crimea. So when you look at it from that perspective, it shouldn’t surprise anybody that there would be a relatively smooth transition. I can’t believe any Ukrainian soldiers have any desire, nor do any Russian soldiers, to be firing at each other. Especially as they’ve had such a close and friendly and cooperative relationship in recent decades.
People celebrate the ceremonial change of time on the railway square in the Crimean city of Simferopol March 30, 2014. (Reuters)
‘US leadership has little respect for Iraq’
RT:Why did Obama compare Iraq to Crimea? Could those two cases actually be compared?
PH: Those comments by President Obama are very sad comments in respect to the Iraqi people. I think comments like that really demonstrate how little respect to the US leadership really has for the country of Iraq and for its people and they seem to forget the huge price that the Iraqi people paid in blood, paid in culture, paid economically for the designs of a handful of US transnational corporations and the Pentagon.
So to make such a statement, such an unequivocal statement, that has no basis really in reality. You can’t compare Iraq and the Crimea. How many Iraqis died since the first Gulf War? Two million, by some people’s estimations. To make that sort of comparison to me is intellectually sloppy and also very disrespectful to all the people who have paid the ultimate price for US foreign policy objectives in the Middle East.
RT:What do you think were Moscow’s aims in Crimea?
PH: I think in terms of Russian diplomacy regarding the Crimea, what you’re really talking about is the government in Moscow’s diplomacy and communication and relationship with the people of the Crimea. I don’t think it should surprise anybody if you look at the history of that part of the world, even Mikhail Gorbachev, who is considered by many in the West as a globalist, as an internationalist, said that the referendum in the Crimea corrected an old mistake, which was made under Nikita Khrushchev in the Soviet Union era. And that has been corrected that Crimea really should be a part of Russia and the people cast their ballots and they spoke quite loudly in fact and the result is in.
You have many other international commentators that would agree. The fact that the UN has not voted to recognize the result in terms of other opinion of UN countries is really disappointing. What the people themselves in that country have said and the argument in the West is that it’s in breach of the Ukrainian constitution. Frankly, the Ukrainian constitution ceases to exist the minute the government in Kiev was taken over at gunpoint, so all bets are off at that point. So it’s quite a disingenuous argument by the West to say that the referendum in the Crimea is in breach of the Ukrainian constitution, considering what happened in Kiev only weeks before.
After her disastrous debut just two weeks ago, in which Janet Yellen managed to crush market spirits to the tune of 200 points in 1 trading hour, today, we got a “better” version of herself that markets tend to love. Just as predicted on this blog. In fact, don’t expect to hear anything but “We will print and do whatever is necessary to keep this liquidity party going” moving forward.
This, of course, relays into everything we have been saying about the economy, the unemployment and the future of interest rates (yield curve). Again, with the advent of the bear market of 2014-2017, the US Economy will find itself in a severe recession by the end of 2014. In such an environment, the FED will not be tightening anything. Counter to today’s popular believe they will be looking to re-inflate, infuse credit or cut in any way possible. The result? Much lower equity prices, compressed (perhaps inverted) yield curve, much higher unemployment rate and surging gold prices.
Basically, exactly the opposite of what most of today’s market participants believe. If you would like to know exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day), while setting the whole mess mentioned above in motion, please Click Here.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!
CHICAGO (Reuters) – Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said on Monday the U.S. central bank’s “extraordinary” commitment to boosting the economy, especially the still struggling labor market, will be needed for some time to come.
Yellen, in her first public speech since becoming Fed chair two months ago, strongly defended the Fed’s policies of low interest rates and continued bond-buying, saying there remains “considerable” slack in the economy and job market.
“I think this extraordinary commitment is still needed and will be for some time, and I believe that view is widely shared by my fellow policy-makers at the Fed,” Yellen said at the 2014 National Interagency Community Reinvestment Conference
