InvestWithAlex.com 

Putin Chills Out. Futures Soar

As I suggested yesterday, Putin got what he wanted and is likely to move on. By destabilizing Ukraine, Western governments ended up putting Putin in an impossible situation. If didn’t do anything, he would be viewed as a weak leader. Yes, he was forced to go into Ukraine. After demonstrating his power and taking Crimea without a single shot, Putin is a happy man. Plus, it is likely there was some sort of a behind the scenes deal where Western governments had agreed to stop meddling in Ukraine business. Put these two together and you have today’s resolution. 

Is this crisis over? Yes and No. It is over if the Western powers back off and shut their mouth. However, if the US Government, the EU Bureaucratic monkeys and the western media continue to go after Putin and/or Russia we might see re-escalation again. It is as simple as that. 

z9

Vladimir Putin said there’s no immediate need for Russia to invade eastern Ukraine as the Obama administration prepares sanctions to punish him for military action in the southern region of Crimea.

In his first public remarks since protesters overthrew Viktor Yanukovych last month, President Putin reserved the right to use force to protect ethnic Russians, though said there’s “no such necessity” at present. Troops stationed in Crimea, where Russia keeps its Black Sea fleet, have only been securing their bases, according to Putin.

“The use of the military is an extreme case,” he told reporters at his residence near Moscow. “But we have a direct request from a legitimate president, Yanukovych, on military aid to protect Ukrainian citizens.”

Russia is tussling with the West for influence over Ukraine, which claims its former Soviet master seized control of Crimea by deploying troops to block army bases and airports. The U.S. and Europe have threatened sanctions against Russia and are racing to seal billions of dollars of aid to help the new administration in Kiev avoid bankruptcy. Russia says Ukraine owes state-controlled energy giant OAO Gazprom $2 billion.

Kerry Visit

As Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Kiev for talks with the new government, officials traveling with him said sanctions such as travel and asset bans on Russian individuals and institutions are likely within days if Russia doesn’t de-escalate its actions in Ukraine and return its forces to barracks. They spoke on condition they not be named because the penalties aren’t finalized.

Putin’s comments signal the crisis, the worst between Russia and the West since the Cold War ended, won’t immediately escalate. The standoff roiled markets as Russia held military exercises on Ukraine’s eastern border. The drills ended today.

Russia’s Micex stock index, which yesterday plunged 11 percent, extended gains as Putin spoke and rose 5.9 percent. The ruble strengthened 1 percent against the dollar-euro based used by the central bank, which unexpectedly raised its benchmark interest rate by 150 basis points to 8 percent yesterday.

Ukraine’s hryvnia gained 3.6 percent to 9.4 per dollar, while the yield on the government’s dollar debt due 2023 fell 82 basis points to 9.738 percent, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Kerry will unveil a U.S. financial-assistance package that includes $1 billion of loan guarantees by international financial institutions, according to a government fact sheet.

An International Monetary Fund delegation is also due in Kiev today. Ukraine needs $15 billion in the next 2 1/2 years to stay afloat, Finance Minister Oleksandr Shlapak said March 1.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Putin Chills Out. Futures Soar  Google

Bernanke: I Am Smarter Than I Look. Trust Me

Well, don’t take medical advice from Ben Bernanke. “Although we have been very aggressive, I think on the monetary policy front we could have been even more aggressive.” Really Ben? This is equivalent to giving a strung out coke head another kilo so he can “feel better”. I am dumb founded that most people don’t get it.

The majority of fiscal and financial issues we see around ourselves can be directly traced back to reckless policies by Greenspan, Bernanke and now Yellen. Their answer to everything is to print more money with complete disregard the larger macroeconomic picture. While printing works for a time, when it stops, there is ALWAYS a price to pay. That is exactly where we find ourselves today. 

Over the last couple of years I have argued, sometimes passionately, that the Federal Reserve doesn’t really know what is going on within our own economy and our financial markets. Not only that, but I have also argued that they are a bunch of idiots and fools who believe that they can somehow control our financial markets.

If recently released transcripts, generated during the 2008 meltdown don’t prove my point of view without a shadow of a doubt, I don’t know what will. Here are just a few quick points from the said transcripts.

  • They didn’t even realize recession was happening until the 4th quarter of 2008. By that point the stock market has completed 80% of its down move.  In fact, for most of 2008 they thought the recession “could be avoided”.

—-Hello???? Was anyone home??? Recession started in Q4 of 2007.

  • Bernanke talked about pent-up demand for housing as late as January 2008.
  • Bernanke was worried about inflation as late as January 2008.
  • Throughout Q1 of 2008 they have held a generally rosy view of the world and the US Economy

 Sure Ben, we believe you. 

ben bernanke cat investwithalex

Bernanke says Fed could have done more during crisis

ABU DHABI (Reuters) – Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the U.S. central bank could have done more to fight the country’s financial crisis and that he struggled to find the right way to communicate with markets.

“We could have done some things on the margin to mitigate somewhat the crisis,” Bernanke, 60, said on Tuesday in his first public speaking engagement since he stepped down in January after eight years heading the Fed.

“Although we have been very aggressive, I think on the monetary policy front we could have been even more aggressive.”

Bernanke said he could now speak more freely about the crisis than he could while at the Fed – “I can say whatever I want” – and in remarks to over 1,000 bankers and financial professionals in the capital of the United Arab Emirates, he made clear that he had regrets.

The United States became “overconfident”, he said of the period before the September 2008 collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers. That triggered a crash from which parts of the world, including the U.S. economy, have not fully recovered.

“This is going to sound very obvious but the first thing we learned is that the U.S. is not invulnerable to financial crises,” Bernanke said.

As the Fed provided tens of billions of dollars of emergency aid to the U.S. financial system, Bernanke said he felt the central bank was in a “terrible” political situation because it could be accused of bailing out institutions unfairly.

He also said he found it hard to find the right way to communicate with investors when every word was closely scrutinized.

“That was actually very hard for me to get adjusted to that situation where your words have such effect. I came from the academic background and I was used to making hypothetical examples and … I learned I can’t do that because the markets do not understand hypotheticals.”

He concluded that he should “try to simplify the message, but not simplify too much”.

Ultimately, Bernanke said, he wished the U.S. economy could have recovered faster but “we did good in a very complicated situation and in a very complex political situation, and the result is what it is.”

REMUNERATION

Bernanke received at least $250,000 for his appearance at the financial conference staged by National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD.AD), the UAE’s largest bank, according to sources familiar the matter. NBAD did not announce the fee.

Because of Abu Dhabi’s oil wealth, state-controlled NBAD prospered during the global crisis caused by Lehman’s collapse, taking market share from hard-hit U.S. and European banks.

Bernanke’s speaking fee is similar to one received by his predecessor Alan Greenspan for an Abu Dhabi speaking engagement in 2008, the sources said.

Greenspan embarked on a series of lucrative speeches after he stepped down, and Bernanke now appears to be doing the same. He is scheduled to speak at an event in South Africa on Wednesday and in Houston on Friday.

Another former heavyweight in U.S. economic policy, ex-Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, spoke at the Abu Dhabi event and criticized some aspects of Fed policy under Bernanke, although he acknowledged that policy needed to be expansionary.

Ultra-loose monetary policy, known as quantitative easing, has diminished returns in the economy and there is concern about the way the impact of low interest rates is being transmitted through the economy, Summers said.

Bernanke, looking relaxed in a grey suit and tie, said that after stepping down, he would write more about his experiences in the crisis to explain his side of the story. “For the future, I’m in a mode of reflection.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Bernanke: I Am Smarter Than I Look. Trust Me  Google

Shocking News: 1.3 Million Homes In California Are Still Underwater

Even though the prices have surged 20-30% in some areas of California last year alone, incredibly, 1.3 million homes are still underwater. If you count the number of houses with 10% equity or less the number should easily approach 2 million homes or 20%.This should come as no surprise to those following this blog.

What is surprising to me is that this level of “undervaluation” still exists in today’s market. Even though the FED pumped in close to $1 Trillion into the US Economy over the last 3 years, this “dead cat” bounce in real estate is failing to impress.  With an upcoming severe bear market and recession within the US Economy, real estate market is bound to decline further. You can read both reports and timing associated with both markets Click Here.   

Just as quick summary, real estate market is completing stage 2 (bounce, aka…dead cat bounce). Once this stage is over, I believe it is already over, the real estate market will start its stage 3 collapse. Typically, this stage is more powerful and takes the market much lower than the one before it. Get yourself ready. 

underwaterhouse-investwithalex

Our Friends at Dr.HousingBubble: 

Does housing policy amount to price fixing from banks? Negative equity, accounting standards, and control of supply. 1.3 million homes in California still underwater.

Housing is an industry made and broken at the margins.  This is why in areas like Beverly Hills or Newport Coast, a small number of sales can skew prices dramatically.  Housing prices in more homogenous markets where many homes are built in cookie cutter fashion provide a better metric of future appraisal values.  How so?  If you have a builder building 1,000 identical homes in Las Vegas, it is hard to justify that your 3 bedroom 2 baths home at 1,500 square feet is valued more than an identical one next door even though you might think it is worth more.  Also, housing is the biggest purchase for most Americans.  You may buy multiple cars over your life but not many homes.  This is why the measures to control inventory by banks and the flood of investors has tilted this market into unfamiliar waters.  High prices in the face of very low inventory.  People struggling to pay mortgages yet banks having no issue buying up a large portion of single family inventory.  Given that the Fed is the mortgage market, are we seeing a minor (or major) portion of price fixing in housing?

Price fixing in real estate

First it may be useful to give a standard definition of price fixing:

“Price fixing is an agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.”

For housing, most of the definition is met.  Banks fully control distressed inventory and the Fed essentially owns the mortgage market.  Since real estate is not standard like say a farm product, there is little ability to set prices in a uniform way however by controlling inventory via stunted accounting rules and slowing down on foreclosures over the years, slowly real estate has moved from weak hands (i.e., American consumers) to stronger hands (i.e., Fed backed banks).  The main mission of the Fed was to protect member banks (many that owned overvalued real estate and derivatives).  All other economic results have been a consequence of this primary mission.

One of the most obvious ways this is revealed is through the number of properties that are still underwater across the nation.  First, take a look at how many properties remain underwater in California where home prices jumped last year in a way we have not seen since the last housing bubble:

NegEquity1

15 percent of California homeowners are still underwater despite the dramatic jump in prices last year.  Throw in those with less than 10 percent equity and you have nearly 20 percent of all homeowners underwater or near underwater.  A massive amount of California homeowners have no equity in their homes even though prices surged last year by 20 to 30 percent in some areas.

Yet price gains are tapering off.  Investors have lost some of their appetite in the market.  Investors buy with the intention of making money off rental incomes or flipping in an ever increasing market.  Prices today are stuck where they were back in the summer of 2013.  The ability for households to buy is constrained by weak income growth.  In California, only 1 out of 3 households can actually purchase a home today at current prices and with their actual earned income.

In California, we have a total pool of housing units of 12,552,658:

census data california

Of these 6,781,817 are occupied by “owners” although you will see from the previous chart that 1.3 million of these owners are fully underwater.  They are paying more on their asset than it is currently worth.  This is typical for a depreciating asset like a car but not a home.  Many of these people bought during the last bubble that ended more than half a decade ago!

Banking policy has worked well for banks and investors have done very well over the last few years.  Peppered throughout the mainstream press is the grim reality that over 5,000,000 households have lost their mortgaged properties via foreclosure.  Many of these homes simply shifted hands to Wall Street, hedge funds, and investors.  The single family home market has become a speculative vehicle once again simply in a different form.

We’ve already noted how many homes are “owner occupied” so it might be useful to see how many homes sold in the latest month of data:

January home sales for California:           25,832

Last month, only 0.38 percent of all properties in the owner occupied category shifted hands.  If demand, supply, interest rates, and emotions are playing into the trend then these few properties will set the market.  The average January sales volume is 31,393 dating back to 1988 in California so demand was much lower (despite more inventory and a much bigger population) yet prices were higher because of heavy investor buying.  Investors seem to be pulling back a bit and that is why we are seeing some more inventory creep in and sales inching back.  Price gains are also moderating.

It is safe to say that the current housing market has many forms of price fixing through a connection of government policy, banking regulation, and Fed monetary policy.  At the moment, this may not be in favor of future homebuyers but it certainly is in favor of current owners and banks.  The dialogue now seems to revolve around “do I speculate and jump in?” or “will market forces break through the control and shift prices?”  This of course assumes you want to “own” although many are opting to rent now.  I don’t buy the arguments from people saying that they simply want to buy for security and then whine how they “missed” the last opportunity and are now locked out forever.  If you really believe that thesis, why not buy today?  If you are buying for the “long run” meaning 30 years or so this minor jump up is nothing in the full scheme of things.  Similar to dollar cost averaging, if you have a long horizon why does the short-term matter?  Many however are speculating but don’t want to call it that.

This is fascinating from an economic stand point because we have never been in a situation like this especially with so much riding on housing.  Price fixing is not a dirty word necessarily but this is definitely going on to a certain degree.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Shocking News: 1.3 Million Homes In California Are Still Underwater Google

Stock Market Update. March 3rd, 2014

z8

3/3/2014 – The volatility is back with the Dow Jones down -153 points (-0.94%) and the Nasdaq down -31 points (0.72%). 

While the rest of the world blames Ukraine and Russia we know better than that. The stock market is tracing out its exact structure. Throughout last week I have warned you that the volatility will back due to a number of significant points of force arriving throughout March. What we are seeing today is clear evidence of that…not in terms of downside, but in terms of volatility. With VIX (volatility index) up 16% today alone and interference patterns abound, March will remain a highly volatile month. 

The question everyone is asking….will this be the start of the bear market?

In terms of bear market structure, my mathematical and timing work show, and I continue to believe, today’s gap down must be closed before this up leg from XXXX completes itself and the bear market resumes. In fact, in our weekly update I presented you with an exact price target that must be achieved before the market turns around. I see very little evidence that such a point will not be reached. .

Further, my analysis shows that Ukraine’s hostilities will die down over the next few days, allowing the market some time to close its gap, recover it’s losses and to push higher to our target below.

As reported over the weekend, at this stage I have a number of very strong indications that the market will hit this point before turning around.

Date: XXXX
Price Target: XXXX

(*** Please Note: About 75% of the information contained within this section has been deliberately removed. Particularly, exact dates and prices of the upcoming turning points. As well as trading forecasts associated with them. I deem such information to be too valuable to be released onto the general public.  As such, this information is only available to my premium subscribers. If you are a premium subscriber please Click Here to log in. If  you would be interested in becoming a subscriber and gaining access to the most accurate forecasting service available anywhere, a forecasting service that gives you exact turning points in both price and time, please Click Here to learn more.Subscription is through lottery only. Don’t forget, we have a risk free 14-day trial). 

Hence, I suggest the following positioning over the next few days/weeks to minimize the risk while positioning yourself for a forecasted market action.

If You Are A Trader: XXXX

If No Position: XXXX

If Long: XXXX

If Short:  XXXX

Please Note: XXXX is available to our premium subscribers in our + Subscriber Section. It’s FREE to start. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Stock Market Update. March 3rd, 2014 Google

Ukranian Neo-Fascist Trying Their Best To Start A War. Obama & The US Media Buy It

The media war between Ukraine, Russian and the West is going into overdrive.Remember all of those innocent Ukrainians in Kiev wanting freedom, liberty and rainbows? Turns out, a lot of them are Neo-Fascist who hate Jews and Russians. Let’s take a closer look at who is trying to start this war.

Russia Government:

 -OR- Ukraine’s Illegitimate Government Ran By Turchynov

  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS SHIPS THREATENED IF ARMS NOT LAID DOWN
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS SHIPS THREATENED WITH SEIZURE
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS SITUATION AROUND FLEET IS DANGEROUS
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS RUSSIA INCREASING CRIMEA FORCES
  • UKRAINE’S TURCHYNOV SAYS RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FLEET HAS BLOCKED UKRAINIAN NAVY VESSELS IN SEVASTOPOL BAYS

So, let me ask you. Who is beating the war drum here? Turchynov is begging the West to get involved at any cost. He doesn’t care what that cost is. Never mind that any involvement by NATO might lead to WW 3.  It is my hope that the US Government and the US Media wake up, pull their head out of their collective ass and see who it is that they are dealing with.  It’s never a good idea to do business with Neo-Fascist. 

Here is my quick analysis. Russia is done. They have taken Crimea and they are more than satisfied with that. If no further provocation occurs, media hysteria will die down over the next few days and our financial markets will recover.  Cheers!!!

Why would markets recover? 

2ukraine-existential-threat-russia.si

CNBC: Russian officials: “Fascists in power now in Ukraine”

Russia’s Upper Council session on whether or not to approve President Vladimir Putin‘s request to send armed forces to Crimea was akin to traveling back in time, rhetorically speaking.

One Russian legislator said: “Look who came to power now in Ukraine—radicals, nationalists, fascists.”

(Read moreParliament approves troops)

In fact, the word ‘fascist’ was used several times throughout the debate (though actual debate was limited since the legislators seemed to all be of the same opinion). 

Another quoted a Russian poet and signaled that now, “it’s time to use weapons, not words.”

Though the White House said it was monitoring the situation in Crimea closely, Putin and most Russian officials see Obama as extremely weak. 

A Russian business source with deep knowledge of Russia’s political, economic, and security situation, who requested anonymity, said morale in the Ukrainian army was low, giving Putin an upper hand.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Ukranian Neo-Fascist Trying Their Best To Start A War. Obama & The US Media Buy It Google

 

Attention Everyone: Janet Yellen Declares Victory.

As per Bloomberg, just two weeks into her tenure, Janet Yellen has already declaring victory on bond vigilantes. Even though FED’s own minutes (from 2008 collapse) show that they are completely incompetent and don’t really know what is happening in our financial markets, the idiots in our media continue to believe that the FED can somehow control the markets or interest rates. 

Again, don’t confuse cause and effect. It is the market and not the FED that lead the economy. While it might look like the FED can control the interest rates, the yield curve and the financial markets, that is never the case. Anyone believing in such absurdity will lose money. Case and point, interest rates are up over 100% in the last 1.5 years. Once this correction is over the interest rates will continue to surge higher (despite upcoming recession).  

As a side note, the market likes to Baptize all income Chairman by fire. So was the case with Greenspan in 1987 and Bernanke in 2007-09. With my timing forecasts indicating a severe bear market and recession between 2014-2017, are you ready Janet Yellen?  

What bear market forecast? 

Inside The International Monetary Fund's Rethinking Macro Policy Conference

Yellen Tames Bond Vigilantes With Volatility at Pre-Taper Levels

When it comes to monetary policy, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen is doing all she can to ensure there’s little difference between herself and Ben S. Bernanke. The bond market is taking notice.

Measures of volatility based on interest-rate swaps have plunged this year and are now approaching levels not seen since before the Fed first signaled in May its intention to reduce the unprecedented bond buying that’s supported the U.S. economy, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

More from Bloomberg.com: Putin Crimea Grab Shows Trail of Warning Signs West Ignored

The relative calm underscores the strides Fed officials have made in reassuring investors that its pullback won’t automatically lead to higher interest rates. After yields on 10-year Treasuries reached a 29-month high at the start of the year, they have since retreated as Yellen pledged to maintain her predecessor’s tapering policy in “measured steps” and keep borrowing costs low to support the U.S. labor market.

“Bond markets understand that Bernanke and now Janet Yellen are talking from the same song sheet,” Neil Mackinnon, a global macro strategist at VTB Capital Plc and former U.K. Treasury official, said in a telephone interview from London on Feb. 24. “The market has bought into the idea that Fed tapering is not tightening.”

More from Bloomberg.com: Winter Storm to Strike New York to Washington Later Today

Treasuries have returned 1.9 percent this year, rebounding from a 3.4 percent annual drop that was the worst since 2009, index data compiled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch show.

Taper Tantrum

Yields on 10-year government bonds, a benchmark for everything from mortgages to car loans and corporate bonds, decreased to 2.65 percent last week from a high of 3.05 percent in January, which was the highest since July 2011. The yield was 2.6 percent as of 11:58 a.m. in New York.

More from Bloomberg.com: Russia Gas Threat Shows Putin Using Pipes to Press Ukraine

Because of the Fed’s quantitative easing, economists including Michael Feroli, the chief U.S. economist at New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co., warned policy makers last week that a financial-market convulsion similar to the “tantrum” that occurred in 2013 may be unavoidable when the central bank does raise interest rates.

“Whenever the decision to tighten policy is made, then the instability seen in summer of 2013 is likely to reappear,” Feroli, a former Fed economist, and his co-authors Anil Kashyap of the University of Chicago, Kermit Schoenholtz of New York University’s Stern School of Business and Hyun Song Shin of Princeton University, said a Feb. 28 gathering.

In the debt markets, volatility gauges provide a more sanguine outlook.

Anxieties Diminish

The Chicago Board Option Exchange Interest Rate Volatility Index, a measure that reflects the cost for contracts to protect against sudden losses by locking-in fixed rates, tumbled last week to the lowest since May.

Normalized volatility on options for 10-year interest-rate swaps due in six months, a gauge of swings of yields (USGG10YR) on similar-maturity Treasuries, dropped as low as 73.99 basis points last month, the least since May 30.

The lack of skittishness stands in contrast to the surge of volatility set off by Bernanke’s comments in May, when he said policy makers could scale back the Fed’s $85 billion in monthly bond purchases in the “next few meetings.”

That month, implied volatility on the contracts known as swaptions surged by the most since Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed in September 2008. Yields on 10-year Treasuries, which fell to a low of 1.61 percent on May 1, eclipsed 3 percent by September and sparked losses in fixed-income assets.

Seasonal Effect

“Much of the 2013 rate volatility was driven by uncertainty in the outlook for Federal Reserve policy,” Jake Lowery, a money manager in Atlanta at ING U.S. Investment Management, which oversees $200 billion, said by telephone on Feb. 25. This year, “the relative certainty in the near-term direction of Fed policy has had its own suppressive effect.”

Although the harsh winter weather contributed to retail sales, manufacturing and housing data that fell short of economists’ estimates, Yellen reiterated on Feb. 27 that the central bank is likely to keep curtailing its stimulus.

The Fed has reduced its purchases of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities by $10 billion at each of its past two policy meetings and economists surveyed by Bloomberg estimate the central bank will maintain that pace until it stops buying bonds in December.

At the same time, she signaled the Fed is moving away from a year-old commitment to lift interest rates from close to zero once the jobless rate falls below 6.5 percent and will instead provide investors with qualitative guidance on its intentions.

Numerical Threshold

Joblessness (USURTOT) in the U.S. fell to 6.6 percent in January, the lowest since October 2008. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg predict the unemployment rate for February, set to be released on March 7, remained unchanged from the previous month.

“We do want to give markets as much of an indication of how we expect to conduct policy as we can,” Yellen said.

Implied yields on federal funds futures traded on the CME Group Inc.’s exchange now show a 58 percent chance the Fed will boost its benchmark rate, which has been in a range of zero to 0.25 percent since December 2008, in July. That’s seven months after economists predict the Fed will end its bond buying.

As recently as September, traders were pricing in the likelihood that the Fed will lift rates by the start of 2015.

The decline in volatility is evidence that debt investors are underestimating the risk yields will jump as the effects of the weather-related slowdown on the U.S. economy pass, said Vincent Chaigneau, global head of rates and foreign-exchange strategy at Societe Generale SA, one of the 22 primary dealers that are obligated to bid at U.S. government debt auctions.

American Optimism

“The economic data has been very distorted,” Chaigneau said in a Feb. 24 telephone interview from Paris. “By spring, when the data improves again, we’ll get some significant market action. Rates will increase and volatility will increase.”

The U.S. economy will expand 2.9 percent this year, according to forecasters in a Bloomberg survey released on Feb. 13. That’s higher than their projection for 2.6 percent growth at the start of the year and would be the fastest in a decade.

Consumer confidence improved in February from a month earlier as more Americans grew optimistic about the outlook for the economy, according to a Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan sentiment index released last week.

Even with the prospect of more robust economic growth, greater clarity by the Fed will help temper any increase in government bond yields, according to Charles Diebel, fixed-income strategist at Lloyds Banking Group Plc in London.

Fiscal Restraint

Yields on 10-year bonds fluctuated within a 0.22 percentage-point range in February, the narrowest since April 2007, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“The last thing Yellen wants to do is be unpredictable,” Diebel said in a telephone interview on Feb. 24. “She wants to be as predictable as she possibly can be.”

The $11.8 trillion market for Treasuries may also benefit from a stronger fiscal balance in the U.S. and less political discord, according to Erik Schiller, a Newark, New Jersey-based money manager for Prudential Fixed-Income, which oversees $405 billion.

Faster growth and spending cuts will help narrow the U.S. deficit to 3 percent of the economy this fiscal year, the lowest in seven years, the Congressional Budget Office projected last month. The estimated gap would compare with 9.8 percent in 2009, the widest since at least 1974, and is close to the average of the past four decades, the agency said.

Lawmakers in December passed the first bipartisan budget from a divided Congress in almost three decades, just two months after a political stalemate caused a government shutdown and pushed the U.S. toward its first default. Last month, Congress suspended the nation’s debt limit until March 2015.

We have “relatively stable long-term deficit projections, very low potential policy risk,” Schiller said in a telephone interview. “Both of those are helping to keep things muted.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Attention Everyone: Janet Yellen Declares Victory.Google

What Does China Think About Ukraine?

Russia and China go way back and have a wonderful working relationship. This was evident at the beginning of Sochi Olympics when Putin and Jinping had a great time together at the opening ceremony and beyond.

Where was Obama? Oh, that’s right, Obama had tried to prove a point by sending an irrelevant “Gay Delegation”. 

Of course, China is watching this situation very carefully, but not for the reasons that you might think. China could care less about Ukraine and at the end of the day is likely to stay out of it. What China is looking for is the level of international response. If Russia is able to get away with Ukraine (as I believe it will), China will be further emboldened to push its agenda in South China Sea and Japanese’s Islands.

Will this have an immediate impact on the US Economy and financial markets? NO. However, all of this will have a significant impact on the overall macroeconomic picture, a picture that will in time impact all of the above.   

ep91-header

BEIJING: China, which consistently says it opposes interference in other countries’ internal affairs, is looking to “maintain principles” on Ukraine, it said Monday after Russia insisted the two were in broad agreement.

Moscow has appeared keen to stress that it has a major international ally on its military intervention in Ukraine, and Beijing frequently backs its positions against Western powers on thorny issues, such as the protracted conflict in Syria.

But analysts say China is torn between wanting to support Russia and keeping to its longtime opposition to foreign intervention, especially given its own separatist issues in the far-western region of Xinjiang.

When asked about Ukraine at a regular press briefing on Monday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Qin Gang answered indirectly.

“China has always upheld the principles of diplomacy and the fundamental norms of international relations,” he said.

“At the same time we also take into consideration the history and the current complexities of the Ukrainian issue. It could be said that China’s position is to both maintain principles while also seeking to be realistic.”

Qin also referred to his statement posted on the ministry’s website a day earlier, which said on the one hand that “China has long maintained a principle of non-interference in internal affairs (of other countries), and respects Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

But it also noted that “there are reasons that the Ukrainian situation is what it is today”.

Niu Jun, a professor of international affairs at Peking University, said China wanted to maintain its relationship with Russia yet had strong concerns about foreign intervention.

“It’s all very inconvenient,” he said. “That’s why they came out with a statement nobody can understand.

“What this statement is really saying is, ‘what Russia did was not right and China does not want to support this military invasion’. But China also wants to support Russia, so it came up with excuses” such as Russia’s history with Crimea and Ukraine’s internal situation, he said.

“Yet at the same time they realise this excuse doesn’t hold water, so they also threw in a mention of sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Earlier, Moscow’s foreign ministry said in a statement that minister Sergei Lavrov and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in a phone call noted “broadly coinciding points of view of Russia and China over the situation that has developed in the country and around it”.

Yet China’s account of the conversation was less direct, saying that the two men “thoroughly exchanged views on the matter” and agreed that “appropriately resolving” the situation was important to regional peace and stability.

Russia has found itself internationally isolated over its covert military intervention in Ukraine and on Monday its stocks and currency collapsed amid fears of a prolonged campaign.

The other members of the G8 on Sunday released a statement condemning Russia for violating international law and suspending their participation in a G8 summit set to be held in Sochi in June.

China is not a member of the G8.

China and Russia cooperated on vetoing three UN Security Council resolutions to put pressure on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, although they voted through a resolution this month on allowing in humanitarian aid convoys.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

What Does China Think About Ukraine?  Google

Ukraine Is Already Lost. Russia Won, Markets Should Move On

wargames

No matter how much huffing and puffing, cursing and table pounding the US and their EU allies will do, Russia has already won. Let’s take a look at the situation from an analytical point of view. 

  • No one is fighting Russia in Ukraine. Yes, the illegitimate Ukrainian Government has called for “mobilization”  and has “declared war” as the Western Media proclaims, but still, no one will join that mobilization nor will anyone fight against Russia. People there are not stupid and will not die for nothing. 
  • Russia is ready to go to an extreme if need be to keep Ukraine. It is ready to go to war. I don’t think the western world is ready to fight over Ukraine. 
  • The US and the EU is out of options. The only real option they have is to get NATO involved. However, any such action would quickly escalate into WW 3. It is just my hope that out mentally challenged government is not considering this move.

As such, Ukraine will go to Russia. Our financial markets will soon realize the same and will recover quickly (over the short term). When? Find Out Here

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Ukraine Is Already Lost. Russia Won, Markets Should Move On  Google

Warning: Student Loans Replace Home Equity ATM’s

Just when I think things can’t possibly get more idiotic and ridiculous, they do.  As WSJ reports, tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of Americans are going back to school in order to take out student loans. Not for education, but to use them as their primary source of income. Once you think about it, it does make perfect sense and I do not blame the people trying to get whatever money they can in order to bridge their expense gap.  

I guess this so called 6.6% unemployment is not working for everyone. I do blame the FEDs and the idiots at every level of our government. The situation we see today is the direct result of monetary policy implemented over the last 2 decades. Somehow, the fools believe that they can simply print money and insure that everything goes on as it should. Of course, it works until it doesn’t.

We have already experienced a number of sever bear markets since the 2000 top. With one more bear market and a severe recession left of the clock (2014-2017), it is my hope that the American people wake up and demand answers from their Government. But I will not be holding my breath.  For most Americans, watching “The Biggest Loser” is a lot more important than understanding macroeconomic issues at hand. Oh well.

student debt investwithalex

WSJ Writes: Student Loans Entice Borrowers More for Cash Than a Degree

Some Americans caught in the weak job market are lining up for federal student aid, not for education that boosts their employment prospects but for the chance to take out low-cost loans, sometimes with little intention of getting a degree.

Take Ray Selent, a 30-year-old former retail clerk in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. He was unemployed in 2012 when he enrolled as a part-time student at Broward County’s community college. That allowed him to borrow thousands of dollars to pay rent to his mother, cover his cellphone bill and catch the occasional movie.

“The only way I feel I can survive financially is by going back to school and putting myself in more student debt,” says Mr. Selent, who has since added $8,000 in student debt from living expenses. Returning to school also gave Mr. Selent a reprieve on the $400 a month he owed from previous student debt because the federal government doesn’t require payments while borrowers are in school.

A number of factors are behind the growth in student debt. The soft jobs recovery and the emphasis on education have driven people to attain more schooling. But borrowing thousands in low-rate student loans—which cover tuition, textbooks and a vague category known as living expenses, a figure determined by each individual school—also can be easier than getting a bank loan. The government performs no credit checks for most student loans.

College officials and federal watchdogs can’t say exactly how much of the U.S.’s swelling $1.1 trillion in student-loan debt has gone to living expenses. But data and government reports indicate the phenomenon is real. The Education Department’s inspector general warned last month that the rise of online education has led more students to borrow excessively for personal expenses. Its report said that among online programs at eight universities and colleges, non-education expenses such as rent, transportation and “miscellaneous” items made up more than half the costs covered by student aid.

The report also found the schools disbursed an average of $5,285 in loans each to more than 42,000 students who didn’t log any credits at the time. The report pointed to possible factors such as fraud in addition to cases of people enrolling without serious intentions of getting a degree.

View gallery

Capella Education Co., which runs online schools, examined student costs and debt at institutions—public and private—in Minnesota and concluded that between a quarter and three-quarters of loans taken out by students were for non-education expenses. At one of Capella’s master’s programs, the typical graduate left with about $30,200 in student debt even though tuition, fees and book costs totaled roughly $18,800. Borrowers are prohibited under federal law, except in rare instances, from discharging student debt through bankruptcy.

The share of student borrowers taking out the maximum amount of loans—$12,500 a year for undergraduates—has risen since the recession. In the 2011-12 academic year, federal Education Department data show, 68% of all undergraduate borrowers hit the annual loan ceiling, up from 60% in 2008.

Research suggests a fair chunk of that is going to non-education expenses. In 2011-12, about a quarter of student borrowers took out loans that exceeded their tuition, after grants, by $2,500, according to research by Mark Kantrowitz, a higher-education analyst and publisher of the education site Edvisors.com.

Some students say they intend to get a degree but must borrow as much as possible because they can’t find decent-paying jobs to cover day-to-day expenses.

Tommie Matherne, a 32-year-old married father of five in Billings, Mont., has been going to school since 2010, when he realized the $10 an hour he was making as a mall security guard wasn’t covering his family’s expenses. He uses roughly $2,000 in student loans each year to stock his fridge and catch up on bills. His wife is a stay-at-home mother who also gets loans to take online courses.

“We’ve been taking whatever we can for student loans every year, taking whatever we have left over and using it to stock up the freezer just so we have a couple extra months where we don’t have to worry about food,” says Mr. Matherne, who owes $51,600 in federal loans.

Some students end up going deeper into debt. Early last year, when Denna Merritt lost her long-term unemployment benefits, the 49-year-old Indianapolis woman enrolled part-time at the Art Institute of Pittsburgh’s online program, aiming for a degree in graphic design. She took out $15,000 in federal loans, $2,800 of which went to catch up on unpaid bills, including utilities, health-insurance premiums and cable.

“Obviously, it’s better not to use it that way if you can help it, because you’re just going to owe that much more later,” says Ms. Merritt, a former bookkeeper.

The government lets students use a portion of federal loans for living expenses on the grounds that it allows students to devote more time to studying and improves their chances of graduating. Even when schools suspect students are over-borrowing, they are restricted by federal law and Education Department policy from denying funds.

College and university trade groups are pushing legislation this year to set lower maximum loan limits for some types of students, such as part-timers. Dorie Nolt, spokeswoman for Education Secretary Arne Duncan, says the Obama administration is “exploring alternatives to see how we might ensure that students don’t borrow more than necessary.”

Mr. Selent, of Fort Lauderdale, knows he is getting himself deeper in a hole but prefers that to the alternative of making minimum wage. In his 20s, he earned a bachelor’s degree in communications from a local for-profit school but couldn’t find a job in the field after graduating and began falling behind on his student-loan bills. He is now taking courses for a degree in theater so he can become an actor.

Meanwhile, federal loans allow him to cover any needs that arise during the semester. Says Mr. Selent: “It keeps me from falling apart.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Warning: Student Loans Replace Home Equity ATM’s   Google