InvestWithAlex.com 

Financial Media Warns: Financial Markets Are About To Make A Huge Move…..Guess The Direction

According to mainstream financial media (see the article below), we have been stuck is a very difficult and confusing sideways market. According to them, with most investors being impatient and with investor sentiment reaching a certain level, a big move is coming.

As true as that may be, their subsequent directional resolution, to everyone’s surprise, is to the upside. What else, as most financial media remains perpetually bullish. The real answer is a lot more complicated. What you are witnessing today is stock distribution prior to an eventual and steep bear market leg.

How do I know?

Such conclusion comes directly out of our mathematical and timing work. Again, our work shows a severe bear market between 2014-2017. When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please CLICK HERE

three-wise-monkeys-hear-no-evil-see-no-evil-speak-no-evil

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Financial Media Warns: Financial Markets Are About To Make A Huge Move…..Guess The Direction Google

Breakout: Investor sentiment suggests a big move is coming

Market volatility has made doubters of us all. The the American Association of Individual Investorssurvey for the week ending May 7th showed 28.3% ‘bulls,’ 28.7% ‘bears’ and a whopping 43% of respondants ‘neutral.’ It’s the highest level of neutrality in more than 10 years.

It takes quite a bit to convince individual investors to not have an opinion about the market but that’s what the last two months have managed to do. “The market is just grinding,” saysoptionMONSTER’s Jon Najarian in the attached clip. “It’s been very easy to be in the wrong individual stocks.”

Case in point for Najarian is Twitter (TWTR) which he started buying on the way down, defying his own discipline and incurring a loss prior to a much-needed bounce (which came in shortly after this segment was taped). “The people that can’t decide, the ‘meh’ crowd, that’s probably been the right decision.”

As for the market as a whole history suggests a sharp move follows peaks in neutral sentiment. Going back to 2005 AAII neutral sentiment has pushed to 38 on 4 distinct prior occasions (August 2013, December 2011, November 2010 and December 2011). Looking at the S&P 500 (^GSPC) a month later showed greater than 4% moves each time over the subsequent 30 days.

Unfortunately for traders the back-test doesn’t give a clear sign. Three of the 1-month moves were up with one sharp drop. Still it’s a safe bet that American investors aren’t going to stay neutral for long. Look for Mr. Market to knock people into the bullish or bearish camps in short order.

Daily Stock Market Update. May 2nd, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com

daily chart May 2 2014

A down day with the Dow Jones down 46 points (-0.28%) and the Nasdaq down 4 points (-0.09%). 

The market has, more or less, flat lined since it’s bounce rally termination point on April 22nd. Over the last 10 trading days the Dow barely moved in net terms, putting most investors and traders into the state of sleep (my subscribers knew of this likely development since April 24).

As I insinuated here before, low energy/flat markets/ low volume/no volatility periods are often followed by powerful and high velocity moves. Remember, it’s the market’s job to bore you to death and put you into a comfortable state of sleep before surging higher or slamming the market lower.  In fact, 1987 crash is a perfect case study of such a time.

While I am not suggesting that we will have a 1987 style crash here, I am suggesting that you should be very alert here. Based on our mathematical and timing work the bear market of 2014-2017 is just around the corner.

When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please CLICK HERE

(***Please Note: Due to my obligations to my Subscribers I am unable to provide you with more exact forecasts. In fact, I am being “Wishy Washy” at best with my FREE daily updates here. If you would be interested in exact forecasts, dates, times and precise daily coverage, please Click Here). 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Daily Stock Market Update. May 2nd, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com Google

Outrageous Secret Revealed: Who Is Insane Enough To Buy Stocks At Today’s Levels?

who is buying this market

Thanks to Bank of America and this chart from ZeroHedge we have our answer. While hedge funds and institutions (supposed smart money) were net sellers, retail mom and pop investors (supposed dumb money) more than picked up the slack since the 2012.

This sort of behavior is typical at market tops. Retail investors are always too late to the party and way too excited to pay exuberant prices for highly speculative stocks. Only to be shocked and swear off the stock market when the stock market proceeds to collapse.

Is it different this time? 

It’s never different. The only question is, how much longer will this insanity last and if you will be able to get out on time. Well, most investors never get out on time as they tend to liquidate their equity holdings closer to the bottom. As to when, our mathematical and timing work clearly shows that the bear market of 2014-2017 is just around the corner.

AKA…..right now would be a great time to get out.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Outrageous Secret Revealed: Who Is Insane Enough To Buy Stocks At Today’s Levels?Google

Shocking Truth Revealed: Recessions Do Not Cause Bear Markets.

Sometimes I read something so utterly stupid that I cannot contain myself. The stock market forecast below from RBC Capital Markets qualifies as just that. Get this. Apparently a bear market in equity prices will wait for an actual recession to happen before taking the markets lower. 

 But Jonathan Golub, chief U.S. market strategist at RBC Capital Markets, wants you to consider this: “rallies do not end when they get tired, they end when recessions ensue.” In a Monday note to clients, he writes that seven of the last eight bull markets ended at the onset of a recession:

It appears Mr. Golub confuses cause and effect. Recessions do not cause bear markets. Bear markets cause recessions. Get it through your heads everyone.

Take a look at 2000 and 2007 bear markets for instance. The official recession numbers tend to show up 6-9 months after most of the financial markets top out. In fact, according to the recently released FED minutes, Bernanke was talking about growth and tightening as late as Q2 of 2008.

What causes bear markets? They are cyclical in nature. There is a beautiful mathematical structure within the stock market that tends to control the ebb and flow of the forces within it’s multidimensional composition. Once that mathematical structure is understood it is fairly easy to predict exactly when the next bear or bull markets will occur.

Speaking off, our mathematical work continues to indicate that we will have a severe bear market between 2014-2017…..followed by a deep recession. When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please CLICK HERE

bear market forecast investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Shocking Truth Revealed: Recessions Do Not Cause Bear Markets. Google

Market Watch Writes: Bull market won’t die until a recession hits: RBC

Investors are hotly debating whether this five-year-old bull market can tack on more years of spectacular growth. But a strategist at RBC Capital Markets has a boldly simple prognosis for the years ahead: it would likely take a recession for the market to reverse course.

After 30% gains in 2013, the S&P 500 index SPX +0.32% is up a mere 0.6% this year. Given the fraught push forward in 2014, investors have approached the bull market with feelings of trepidation.

But Jonathan Golub, chief U.S. market strategist at RBC Capital Markets, wants you to consider this: “rallies do not end when they get tired, they end when recessions ensue.” In a Monday note to clients, he writes that seven of the last eight bull markets ended at the onset of a recession:

On to the next question: Are we approaching a recession? Golub says that answer is no, given the sluggish pace of our recovery from the last recession:

“No two recessions are the same, but they tend to follow a similar pattern. Typically, an accelerating economy burns through existing spare capacity. This leads to inflationary pressure, which forces the Fed to act. As markets anticipate rate hikes, the yield curve inverts. Growth slows and, more often than not, the economy rolls over, taking the market with it.

“The current economic rebound is the slowest of the post-war period. Growth is being held back by a modest housing recovery and weak business confidence. As a result, abundant spare capacity exists, which prolongs the length of the cycle.”

All in all, the silver lining of our slow economic recovery is that another recession is a fair distance away, says Golub:

Therefore, Golub’s bull-market thesis remains intact: Price-to-earnings ratios will continue to expand, leading to double-digit returns over the next few years.

As the bull market turned five years old last month, MarketWatch’s Wallace Witkowski quoted Jeff Kleintop, chief market strategist at LPL Financial, who similarly noted theconnection between the end of bull markets and recessions. But Kleintop and other strategists asserted that for the bull market to continue, one key ingredient is acceleration in growth — not just a continuation of its sluggish pace.

By one analysis in the story, U.S. economic growth needs to hit 3% by the end of 2014 to keep the bull market alive, no easy task considering a slowdown in growth to start the year.

In the fourth quarter on 2013, GDP hit 2.4%. We’ll get one sign of just how fast the economy is humming along when we get a GDP report for the first quarter of the year on Wednesday.

Tech Bubble 2.0 Is Here: Why High Flyers Will Collapse To The Tune Of 70-90%. Scary!

David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital certainly thinks so…… 

“Now there is a clear consensus that we are witnessing our second tech bubble in 15 years. What is uncertain is how much further the bubble can expand, and what might pop it. The current bubble is an echo of the previous tech bubble, but with fewer large capitalization stocks and much less public enthusiasm,” The firm said it was shorting a group of undisclosed “high-flying momentum stocks.”

We have maintained the same view for quite some time now. With unprecedented level of speculation, overvaluation, FED printing, IPO insanity and asset price inflation, today’s fundamental situation is not that dissimilar to 2007 top.  And while Mr. Einhorn is not particularly sure about the timing, we are.

The upcoming collapse in high flying tech specs will unfold in short order as our mathematical and timing work indicates. Again, our work shows a severe bear market between 2014-2017. When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please CLICK HERE

fab 5 stocks

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Tech Bubble 2.0 Is Here: Why High Flyers Will Collapse To The Tune Of 70-90%. Scary! Google

CNBC Writes: Einhorn: Bubble brewing, shorting momentum stocks

David Einhorn has a clear warning for technology investors: we’re in a bubble.

“Now there is a clear consensus that we are witnessing our second tech bubble in 15 years,” Greenlight Capital said in an investor letter Tuesday. “What is uncertain is how much further the bubble can expand, and what might pop it.”

The firm said there were several indications of the over-exuberance, including the rejection of conventional valuation methods; short sellers forced to cover their positions because of losses; and “huge” first-day stock appreciations after their initial public offerings.

“The current bubble is an echo of the previous tech bubble, but with fewer large capitalization stocks and much less public enthusiasm,” the letter said. The firm said it was shorting a group of undisclosed “high-flying momentum stocks.”

A spokesman for Greenlight declined to comment.

The firm also disclosed a number of new long positions, including retailer Conn’s (CONN), Japanese regional bank Resona Holdings and solar plant company SunEdison (SUNE). Shares of Conn’s and SunEdison rose sharply on the news. The firm also closed four short positions: Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Fortescue Metals Group(ASX:FMG-AU), Loblaw Cos. (Toronto Stock Exchange: L-CA) and Michael Kors Holdings (KORS). All lost the firm money, according to the letter.

Greenlight’s main fund fell 1.5 percent in the first quarter, according to the letter. The largest winner was a long bet on Micron Technology (MU) and Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR), a short, was the most significant loser.

The firm’s largest long positions at the end of March were Alpha Bank, Apple (AAPL), gold, Marvell Technology(MRVL) and Micron.

Separate from its stock holdings, Greenlight discussed its trading costs because of the high-frequency trading concerns raised in the new book, “Flash Boys.”

The firm said the abuses described in the Michael Lewis book “don’t significantly impact us” but said it supports new alternative trading platform IEX. Greenlight said it holds a small stake in the exchange, which has styled itself as a safer place to trade for investors worried about HFT front running.

Janet Yellen: Bubbles? What Bubbles?

As per Bloomberg report below, Janet Yellen said nothing about the risk that her easy monetary policy will inflate asset bubbles. DUH!? What Bloomberg missed is that we are already in a massive bubble or bubbles. While the primary bubble is singular in nature….CREDIT……adjacent bubbles are too numerous to mention here (stock market, real estate, bonds, car loans, student debt, etc…) In fact, the situation we face today is not that dissimilar from the situation we had faced at 2007 top. It is almost identical and I challenge anyone to prove me otherwise.

Is the FED aware of these bubbles while hoping for the best or are they completely blind? Unfortunately, I continue to maintain it’s the latter. As I have mentioned before, their 2008 FED Minutes is a clear indication of that. They are a reactionary force at best, only able to correct the direction after the fact. Somehow, the markets believe that the FED possesses a supernatural power to control and to direct the markets. And that is why I continue to maintain that market participants with such a view will pay dearly for their misconception over the next few years.

janet yellen investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

Janet Yellen: Bubbles? What Bubbles?  Google

Bloomberg Writes: Dovish Sign? Janet Yellen Says Nothing About Asset Bubbles

Sometimes what’s not said is more important than what’s said. In a speech today, Federal Reserve chief Janet Yellen said nothing about the risk that easy monetary policy will inflate asset bubbles. Leaving that topic out of her speech could be taken as a sign that bubbles are not at the top of her list of concerns—which could make her more willing to keep interest rates low to strengthen economic growth.

Yellen certainly knows that asset bubbles are on the minds of investors and analysts. They’ve been a prime concern of one of her Federal Reserve Board colleagues, Jeremy Stein, who announced earlier this month that he will resign on May 28 to return to teaching at Harvard University.

She certainly had the time and opportunity to bring up bubbles. Her prepared remarks to the Economic Club of New York were 3,830 words long and were followed by extensive remarks in a question-and-answer session.

Last November, in her confirmation hearing for the Fed chairmanship, Yellen toldthe Senate Banking Committee that the Fed is devoting “a good deal of time and attention to monitoring asset prices in diferent sectors” to see if bubbles are forming. Even then she didn’t seem exceptionally worried. She said, “I don’t see evidence at this point in major sectors of asset-price misalignments, at least of a level that would threaten financial instability.”

The Financial Times’ Cardiff Garcia also made note of the curious incident today. He wrote, “In this speech, financial stability concerns weren’t raised at all.”

Stock Market Update. April 11th, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com

daily chart April 11 2014

Another down day with the Dow Jones down 143 points (-0.89%) and the Nasdaq down 54 points (-1.34%) 

The amount of stupidity associate with the recent market decline continues to increase unabated. From Carl Icahn’s barber being excited about this stock market to most market pundits predicting an Earth shattering decline of 5-7% before an eventual bounce. While all of that is going on the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology (IBB) is already down over 20% while the Nasdaq is down 8.2%. Yet, all of the above is irrelevant.  One must understand where we are in the cyclical and mathematical composition of the stock market. While I have tried my best to drill that information into investor consciousness, most of it falls on deaf ears. That is to be expected, I got the same reception in 2007.

To quickly summarize,  we are still in the secular bear market that started on January 14th, 2000. Based on our mathematical and timing work this bear market will complete itself in 2017. When it does, you will see most of the gains from 2009 bottom vanish into thin air. With the 5 year cycle (1994 -2000, 2002-2007 and 2009-2014) now complete you will see a bear market initiate within a relatively short period of time. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start(to the day) and it’s subsequent internal composition, please Click Here   

(***Please Note: Due to my obligations to my Subscribers I am unable to provide you with more exact forecasts. In fact, I am being “Wishy Washy” at best with my FREE daily updates here. If you would be interested in exact forecasts, dates, times and precise daily coverage, please Click Here). 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Stock Market Update. April 11th, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com  Google

Markets Continue To Collapse. What’s Next?

Just a picture of iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology (IBB) slicing through it’s lows like a hot knife through butter. Bear Market? What bear market? Statistically, April is the best month for stocks and according to Mr. Saut (from earlier post) the market is set for a 12% gain this year. “Sarcasm”. Listen, if you are tired of the main stream financial media bullshit and would like to find out exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please follow us Here

IBB.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Markets Continue To Collapse. What’s Next?  Google

Today’s Market Action Is A Perfect Example Of Why You Should Never Follow The FED

Yesterday, the market soared on the FOMC Minutes indicating slower tightening (if any at all) over the next few years. Just as we have been saying for a long time. Today, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank suggested that the central bank might push its main interest rate even lower or cut the rate it pays banks on excess reserves kept at the U.S. central bank to accelerate economic recovery.

Say what? 

How can you cut something that is already technically ZERO. Since the rates are at zero and the yield curve is flattening as we speak, what are they going to do when the next recession hits? QE 100 Billion, 500 Billion, $1Trillion/month or will they just send everyone a check for $1 Million. And that’s the biggest problem here. The FEDs have already used up their BAZOOKA and there is nothing they can do to prevent, stop or reverse the next recession. As per out mathematical work the next recession/bear market will transpire between 2014-2017. Checkmate. 

unconventional FED

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Today’s Market Action Is A Perfect Example Of Why You Should Never Follow The FED Google

 

Reuters: Fed could cut rates to combat joblessness: Kocherlakota

ROCHESTER, Minnesota (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve should do more to boost both inflation and jobs, a top Fed official said on Tuesday, including possibly pushing its main interest rate even lower or cutting the rate it pays banks on excess reserves kept at the U.S. central bank.

“The key is for us to be able to demonstrate in an effective fashion that we are committed to the recovery,” Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, told reporters after a speech.

The Fed has been winding down its massive bond-buying stimulus since early this year, and Kocherlakota said he has no plans to “relitigate” that decision, which puts the Fed on track to ending bond-buying altogether before the end of the year.

Instead, he said on Tuesday, the Fed must do better on returning the economy more rapidly to full employment and a healthy 2-percent pace of inflation.

The Fed has kept its short-term policy rate between zero and a quarter of a percentage point since December 2008, and Kocherlakota told the Greater Rochester Chamber of Commerce that “we should be thinking about” pushing it even lower.

“It’s really about demonstrating a commitment to stay with the recovery for as long as it takes to get the economy fully recovered,” he said.

The idea of lowering the Fed’s main policy rate, already near zero, or cutting the rate the Fed pays to banks on reserves they keep locked up at the central bank, is outside the mainstream of current Fed policymaking, which currently is focused on providing guidance about what economic conditions could lead to the Fed raising rates.

Kocherlakota, whose lone dissent against the Fed’s policy decision last month marks him as the central bank’s most dovish member, said that guidance falls short.

“We would be better off having more of a collective vision as a committee to what the change in conditions would have to be that would lead us from ending the asset purchase program to raising rates,” he told reporters.

“Unless we communicate as a group about what those conditions are, then we face this instability that two words in a press conference, or two words in a speech or an answer to a Senator can end up moving financial markets participants’ vision of what we are trying to do with policy.”

The Fed last month said it would reduce its monthly bond purchases to $55 billion and would continue to trim the program in measured steps as long as the economy improves as it expects.

After the policy-setting meeting, Fed Chair Janet Yellen briefly roiled markets when she suggested the Fed may start raising rates around “six months” after the bond-buying program ends. She also said that the timing of any rate hike depends on economic conditions, but that message was lost in the immediate aftermath of her answer.

“Unless we communicate more effectively on a collective basis about how conditions are shaping our policy choices, I think we going to continue to face that kind of instability,” Kocherlakota said.

In recent weeks several Fed policymakers have given their views as to when rates ought to start rising, although forecasts from all 16 current policymakers show nearly all expect it sometime next year.

Kocherlakota on Tuesday refused to be drawn about his personal expectations for when rates should rise.

He reiterated his expectation that the U.S. economy will likely grow around 3 percent this year and that unemployment will fall to the “low sixes” by the end of this year, from 6.7 percent now.

“It’s a question of the speed of the recovery, not about whether we are seeing a recovery,” he said.

Inflation, which is running near 1 percent, is “too low” and does not look likely to rise back to the Fed’s 2 percent goal for another four years, Kocherlakota said.

“Low inflation in the United States tells us that resources are being wasted,” he said, including the productive potential of Americans who cannot get jobs because demand for goods and services is so low.

And while unemployment has fallen from the recession-era high of 10 percent, “the U.S. labor market is far from healthy,” he said. Longer term, he said, unemployment should fall to just over 5 percent.

Kocherlakota’s view that the Fed should do more is no secret: The Fed, in his view, should have promised to keep rates near zero until U.S. unemployment falls below 5.5 percent, as long as inflation and financial stability risks are contained.

Instead, the Fed last month dropped the idea of tying low rates to any specific unemployment figure and said it would factor in a wide range of economic measures as it judged the correct timing for raising rates.

Kocherlakota said that the Fed could reword its policy statement show “a stronger commitment to the recovery in terms of being willing to stay accommodative for as long as it takes to see the recovery to completion.”

How Long Before The Stock Market Is In Real Trouble

Once in a blue moon CNBC posts something worth reading (see full report below). 

“What we’re concerned about it whether or not some of the other stocks that have gone straight up are starting to move sideways, either in a consolidation or in preparation for some distribution,” Yamada said, referring to a bearish pattern that indicates a market top. “It’s a little iffy here.

Then the guy goes on to destroy all credibility: “The one positive, of course, is that 2015, as a year ending in 5, has a very good record of being an up year,” the technician said. “That’s the silver lining.”

Overall we tend to agree. When (not if) the S&P breaks below 1,740 it will signal the beginning of a bear market. With that said, we already know exactly when that is going to happen as per our mathematical and timing work. If you would be interested in learning when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s subsequent internal composition, please Click Here.  

S&P Chart

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

How Long Before The Stock Market Is In Real Trouble  Google

CNBC Writes: If this happens, the S&P 500 is in real trouble: Pro

After two tough sessions for the market, the S&P 500(^GSPC) hit a one-month low on Tuesday morning before turning positive for the day. But technical analyst Louise Yamada says the stock slide isn’t over just yet.

“I don’t think the pullback is already over,” Yamada, of Louise Yamada Technical Research Advisors, said on Tuesday’s episode of “ Futures Now .” “I think that it’s an interim pullback, and we’ve certainly seen what we’ve expected, in the Internet and biotechs coming off. And I think that although they may bounce, there’s probably still a little bit more to go on the downside.”

Read More 2 charts tell the whole story of value vs. growth

Worse yet, the selling could spread to other sectors, such as aerospace and consumer discretionary stocks.

“What we’re concerned about it whether or not some of the other stocks that have gone straight up are starting to move sideways, either in a consolidation or in preparation for some distribution,” Yamada said, referring to a bearish pattern that indicates a market top. “It’s a little iffy here.”

What would cause real concern is if the S&P trades below 1,750.

“If we break that level, that will be the first lower low that we would have seen all the way back to 2011, really,” Yamada said.

 

Below 1,750, support lies at 1,650, which is “where the 2009 uptrend would be by midyear,” she wrote to CNBC.com. That is about 11 percent below current levels.

Yamada says the weakness in stocks lines up well with broader bearish indicators, such as the fact that 2014 started with a weak January, and is a midterm election year.

Read More Why you should totally ignore the ‘January barometer’

But it’s not all bad.

“The one positive, of course, is that 2015, as a year ending in 5, has a very good record of being an up year,” the technician said. “That’s the silver lining.”