InvestWithAlex.com 

Putin’s Divorce Finalized. About To Invade Ukraine

What does every Alpha male needs to do after his divorce is finalized? Grab a few drinks and punch another man in the face, of course. Been there and done that. Yet, Putin is about to put every other man on the face of this earth to shame by invading another country shortly after finalizing his divorce. According to today’s NATO report, Russian forces are in full battle alertness and high state of readiness. Of course, the US stock market could care less as of right now. Expect it to crater as soon as Russia sets foot in East Ukraine. 

Last Friday I warned that Russia will invade East Ukraine this Thursday. I got that information from a Russian business associate who is very well connected within Russian military. An ex General. Yet, after trying to verify the information from other sources, I was unable. In short, no one in Russian is talking and/or answering my questions. It would be very interesting to see if Russia does go in tomorrow as my friend had suggested. It would make a lot of sense from Russia’s perspective to do just that considering Ukraine’s recent NATO joint exercise announcement. If Russia goes in, expect tensions to spike and economic warfare to intensify.  

RUSSIA-PUTIN-KABAYEVA
Putin’s Girlfriend

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Putin’s Divorce Finalized. About To Invade Ukraine Google

Bloomberg Reports: NATO Warns Russia Force on Ukraine Border Ready to Act

NATO leaders warned today that Russian forces massed near the country’s border with Ukraine are in a high state of readiness and that any incursion across the frontier would be a “historic mistake.”

The presence of as many as 40,000 soldiers along Ukraine’s eastern border is fueling concern that Russia is poised to invade on the pretext of protecting Russian-speaking inhabitants of eastern and southern Ukraine. Backed by state-run media, President Vladimir Putin says the Kiev-based government is influenced by Russophobe extremists and hasn’t done enough to stop them from persecuting Russian-speakers.

“We have seen a very massive Russian military buildup along the Ukrainian borders,” North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after a two-day meeting of alliance foreign ministers in Brussels. “We also know that these Russian military armed forces are at very high readiness.”

Earlier today, Russia pressed Ukraine to disarm nationalists it says are oppressing its compatriots there, echoing comments it made in the run-up to its military occupation of Crimea and its annexation last month following a Kremlin-backed referendum. Ukraine’s government denies that Russian speakers are at risk.

Photographer: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg

The “hammer and sickle” emblem of the Russian state sits on display above the offices… Read More

“We urge the Ukrainian authorities not to limit themselves to sham statements about the fight against radical forces in Ukraine and to take decisive measures to disarm the militants,” Russia’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement on its website.

Military Buildup

NATO ministers vowed yesterday to boost support for eastern nations unnerved by Russia’s actions. Today, Rasmussen restated that the alliance hasn’t seen signs of a significant reduction in Russian military forces along Ukraine’s border.

“This is really a matter of grave concern,” he said. “If Russia were to intervene further in Ukraine, I wouldn’t hesitate to call it a historic mistake.”

The alliance’s top military commander, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, echoed Rasmussen’s concerns in an interview with Reuters and the Wall Street Journal.

Russia’s military is “ready to go and we think it could accomplish its objectives in between three and five days if directed,” Breedlove said in the interview. “This is a very large and very capable and very ready force.”

Ruble Rout

Potential objectives include an incursion into southern Ukraine to establish a land corridor to Crimea, pushing beyond Ukrainian port of Odessa or moving toward Transnistria, a breakaway pro-Russian region of Moldova, the general was reported as saying.

The worst confrontation between the U.S. and European states and Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union has rattled markets.

The Micex stock index fell 0.2 percent to 1,373.33 in Moscow, extending to 4.9 percent its decline since March 1, when Putin’s intervention sparked the standoff between Russia and the U.S. The ruble has depreciated 7 percent against dollar this year, making it the second-worst performer of 24 emerging-market currencies tracked by Bloomberg.

Ukraine, whose hryvnia has lost 27 percent against the dollar this year, may return to international markets with a Eurobond sale in the second half of this year, Finance Minister Oleksandr Shlapak said today in Kiev. He said the government was willing to pay 6 percent to 7 percent, versus the 8.574 percent yield on its 2023 dollar bond as of 6:15 p.m. today.

Growth Threat

The standoff over Ukraine poses a threat to a global economy that’s already “too weak for comfort,” International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde said today. The Washington-based IMF is preparing to lead a $27 billion global bailout for cash-strapped Ukraine.

Shrugging off U.S. and European sanctions, Putin has justified the annexation of Crimea, a region with a majority of Russian speakers with historic ties to Moscow, away from Ukraine as righting a historical wrong that split the province from Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed.

NATO has decided to halt “all practical cooperation” with Russia, Rasmussen said yesterday. Russia condemned the NATO decision, saying this would hurt joint efforts to fight terrorism, piracy and other global problems.

“It’s not hard to guess who will benefit from halting the joint work of Russia and NATO in countering modern threats,” the Foreign Ministry said on its website. “In any case, it certainly won’t be Russia and the members of NATO.”

U.S. Navy

Options being considered by Breedlove also include putting an additional U.S. warship in the Black Sea, beefing up previously scheduled NATO exercises and improving the readiness of the alliance’s 13,000-member rapid-response force, according to an American defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss military planning.

“We directed our military commanders to develop additional measures to enhance our collective defense and deterrence against any threat of aggression,” Rasmussen said.

Russia is pressuring Ukraine to change its constitution to cede more autonomy to its regions and enshrine Russian as a second official language. After a deadly clash between Ukrainian police and far right activists as well as confrontations between pro-Russian and pro-Kiev protesters last month, the parliament in Kiev voted yesterday for a resolution backing the immediate disarmament of illegal military groups.

“The two sides are talking totally different languages,” Timothy Ash, a London-based economist foremerging markets at Standard Bank Group Ltd., said in e-mailed comments today. “While the battle for Crimea may have been lost, the stealth war for Ukraine is only just beginning.”

The US Government Is For Sale….Again

In yet anther “politically driven” and idiotic decision by the Supreme Court, you can now, once again, buy your favorite Senator.   In 5-4 decision the Supreme Court strikes down political donation limits. 

 “The Supreme Court majority continued on its march to destroy the nation’s campaign finance laws, which were enacted to prevent corruption and protect the integrity of our democracy,” said Democracy 21 president Fred Wertheimer, a longtime advocate for election money reforms. “The court re-created the system of legalized bribery today that existed during the Watergate days.”

Right after the decision, bribery premiums for your favorite Senator or Congressman surged 100%. Yep, we are moving in the right direction. 

the us government is now for sale investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

The US Government Is For Sale….Again Google

 

CNN Writes: Justices strike down political donor limits

 
Posted by

Washington (CNN) – In another blow to federal election laws, the Supreme Court on Wednesday eliminated limits on the total amount people can donate to various political campaigns in a single election season. However, the court left intact the current $5,200 limit on how much an individual can give to any single candidate.

At issue is whether those regulations in the Federal Election Campaign Act violate the First Amendment rights of contributors.

The divided 5-4 ruling could have an immediate impact on November’s congressional midterm elections, and add another layer of high-stakes spending in the crowded political arena.

Possible 2016 GOP contenders pow-wow with big donors

“We conclude that the aggregate limits on contributions do not further the only governmental interest this court accepted as legitimate” said Chief Justice John Roberts, referring to a 1976 precedential ruling.

“They instead intrude without justification on a citizen’s ability to express the most fundamental First Amendment activities.”

Roberts was supported by his four more conservative colleagues.

In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer said the majority opinion will have the effect of creating “huge loopholes in the law; and that undermines, perhaps devastates, what remains of campaign finance reform.”

The ruling leaves in place current donor limits to individual candidates, and donor disclosure requirements by candidates, political parties, and political action committees.

Parties tout fundraising figures

The successful appeal from Shaun McCutcheon, 46-year-old owner of an Alabama electrical engineering company, is supported in court by the Republican National Committee.

They object to a 1970s Watergate-era law restricting someone from giving no more than $48,600 to federal candidates, and $74,600 to political action committees during a two-year election cycle, for a maximum of $123,200.

McCutcheon says he has a constitutional right to donate more than that amount to as many office seekers as he wants, so long as no one candidate gets more than the $5,200 per election limit ($2,600 for a primary election and another $2,600 for a general election).

But supporters of existing regulations say the law prevents corruption or the appearance of corruption. Without the limits, they say, one well-heeled donor could in theory contribute a maximum $3.6 million to the national and state parties, and the 450 or so Senate and House candidates expected to run in 2014.

Opponents of some of the current regulations applauded the court’s reasoning.

“What I think this means is that freedom of speech is being upheld,” said House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). “You all have the freedom to write what you want to write donors ought to have the freedom to give what they want to give.”

But supporters of the limits expressed disappointment.

“The Supreme Court majority continued on its march to destroy the nation’s campaign finance laws, which were enacted to prevent corruption and protect the integrity of our democracy,” said Democracy 21 president Fred Wertheimer, a longtime advocate for election money reforms. “The court re-created the system of legalized bribery today that existed during the Watergate days.”

The individual aggregate limits were passed by Congress in the wake of the Watergate scandal, and upheld by the high court in 1976.

The current competing arguments are stark: Supporters of campaign finance reform say current federal regulations are designed to prevent corruption in politics. Opponents say they criminalize free speech and association.

The current case deals with direct political contributions. A separate 2010 high court case dealt with campaign spending by outside groups seeking to influence federal elections. There, the conservative majority – citing free speech concerns – eased longstanding restrictions on “independent spending” by corporations, labor unions, and certain non-profit advocacy groups in political campaigns.

The Citizens United ruling helped open the floodgates to massive corporate spending in the 2012 elections. It also led to further litigation seeking to loosen current restrictions on both the spending and donations.

After the high court’s oral arguments in October, President Obama had weighed in, saying he supports the current law.

“The latest case would go further than Citizens United,” a three-year-old ruling expanding corporate spending, he said, “essentially saying: anything goes. There are no rules in terms of how to finance campaigns.

John Stewart On High Frequency Trading

In more proof that high frequency trading will soon be outlawed (I hope), John Stewart jumps on the bandwagon in a funny kind of way. For those of you not particularly caught up on the issue, this is a great place to start. In addition to HFT, John also goes after inept and fraudulent main stream financial media for perpetuating and defending this fraud. I couldn’t agree more.  

 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Google

Janet Yellen: Forget About Rate Hikes

As per report below, according to Janet Yellen’s indicators the US Economy is nowhere near where it should be for the rates to rise anytime soon. That is despite the stock market being up over 150% over the last 5 years. In fact, today’s ADP Job Report missed the mark for the 4th month in a row with 191,000 jobs created VS 195,000 expected. Becoming just another confirmation of what we have been saying all along here.

Forget about any rate increases over the next few years. That becomes more apparent when you look at our mathematical and timing work forecasts. Once again, they predict a sharp bear market between 2014-2017 and a subsequent deep recession in the US Economy. Under such circumstances, the FED will be looking for every possible avenue to re-inflate the markets instead of raising rates. In other words, as of today, most market participants are positioned in precisely the wrong way.  If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please Click Here.  

no rate hikes investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Janet Yellen: Forget About Rate Hikes  Google

Bloomberg Writes: Yellen Jobs Dashboard Shows Rate Rise Far on Horizon: Economy

More than two-thirds of the gauges on Janet Yellen’s labor-market dashboard are still showing worse readings than before the recession, reinforcing her belief that the economy will need “extraordinary support” from the Federal Reserve for “some time to come.”

Only two of the nine indicators flagged by the new Fed chair — payroll growth and layoffs — are back to where they were in the four years leading up to the last economic downturn. The seven others, including joblessness, underemployment and labor-force participation, have yet to return to their 2004-to-2007 averages.

“The unemployment rate and a lot of these other series aren’t where the Fed thinks they need to be,” said Joe LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank Securities in New York and the top forecaster of unemployment over the past two years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Policy makers are “going to need a general sense that the labor market has entered a more sustainable path before they start to consider the possibility of raising interest rates.”

Yellen is using what she calls her “dashboard” of jobs data to justify the Fed’s easy-money policies and to argue that there’s still considerable slack in the labor market almost five years after the recession’s end. While the job market has strengthened considerably from the depths of the downturn, it is “not back to normal health,” the Fed chief said in a March 31 speech in Chicago.

Main Laggards

The biggest laggards have been long-term unemployment and participation. More than a third of the jobless have been out of work for more than 26 weeks, while the share of the working-age population in the labor force is at an almost 36-year low.

“The indicators are mixed,” said Roberto Perli, a partner at Cornerstone Macro LP in Washington and a former central bank economist. “That allows the Fed to stay the course” and keep interest rates low.

Yellen’s console of statistics has pluses and minuses. While it provides a broader picture of the labor market than focusing on the unemployment rate alone, it can confuse investors about the Fed’s intentions because it introduces additional variables without making clear how much weight the central bank is giving to each statistic.

“The market is more vulnerable to surprise in some of these other labor-market data,” LaVorgna said.

Some economists, including Michelle Girard of RBS Securities in Stamford, Connecticut, also worry that the instrument panel overestimates the amount of slack in the labor market and includes gauges that aren’t susceptible to changes in Fed policy.

The Fed is projected to begin raising interest rates in the third quarter of next year, according to the median estimate of 65 economists in a Bloomberg survey conducted March 7-12.

Jobs Report

Yellen, 67, will get an update on five of the indicators — joblessness, payrolls, underemployment, long-term unemployment and labor-force participation — on April 4 when the government releases employment data for March. The other four gauges — measuring the rate of hiring, layoffs, quits and job openings — are included in the monthly labor turnover summary, next out on April 8.

Chris Collins doesn’t need a basketful of statistics to tell him the labor market isn’t working. The 37-year-old operating engineer in Henderson, Nevada, has been unemployed since April 2013, when his last construction project ended.

“I try to stay upbeat, because sometimes that’s all you have to hold onto is the hope that there’s going to be a big project that breaks loose and you’re going to get back to work and get back on your feet,” said Collins, who specializes in heavy-machinery operation, including work with cranes and paving. “In the meantime, I’m looking outside the industry, just trying to find something to put a little change in the pocket and help my family.”

Threshold Discarded

Fed policy makers put the focus on a broad range of economic and labor-market data last month after junking their strategy for guiding financial markets based on an unemployment threshold. Under its previous plan, the Fed pledged not to consider raising its benchmark interest rate, now zero to 0.25 percent, at least until the jobless rate fell to 6.5 percent.

In place of that quantitative guidance, the central bank adopted a more qualitative approach, saying on March 19 it “will take account of a wide range of information” in deciding when to raise rates.

Policy makers abandoned their jobless marker after unemployment fell faster than they had projected, hitting 6.7 percent in February. Much of the decline was due to Americans dropping out of the labor force, rather than more hiring. Yellen and most Fed policy makers reckon that the long-run sustainable jobless rate is between 5.2 percent and 5.6 percent.

Readings Improving

At a press conference after the March 18-19 policy meeting, Yellen said most of the labor-market statistics she looks at are getting better. “If you ask about my dashboard, the dial on virtually all of those things is moving in the direction of improvement,” she said.

Economists are expecting further gains with the release of jobs data on April 4. Payrolls are projected to have risen 200,000 in March, according to the median prediction of economists surveyed by Bloomberg. That compares with a monthly average of 194,250 last year and 161,800 between 2004 and 2007. Still, total payrolls remain 666,000 below the pre-recession peak.

March unemployment is forecast to come in at 6.6 percent, down from 6.7 percent in February and a 26-year high of 10 percent in October 2009. It averaged 5 percent from 2004 to 2007.

Slack Exaggerated

Long-term joblessness hasn’t shown nearly as much improvement. At 37 percent, the share of unemployed who have been out of work for 27 weeks or longer still is almost twice its pre-recession average. It reached 45.3 percent in April 2010, its highest level in government records dating to 1948.

This gauge is “probably the most controversial” on Yellen’s dashboard, said Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist for Barclays Plc. in New York. That’s because it may exaggerate the amount of excess manpower in the labor market.

When people are out of work for so long, they tend to become less active in seeking a job, and employers consider them less suitable for hiring, according to studies by economists at Princeton University, Columbia University and the Boston Fed.

That suggests that wages could pick up as the labor market improves, even if the share of long-term unemployment stays high, Maki said.

The participation rate also may be giving the Fed an inflated view of the number of potential workers available, said Girard, chief U.S. economist for RBS in Stamford, Connecticut. At 63 percent in February, it’s near an almost 36-year low of 62.8 percent in December and down from a 66.1 percent average in the four years ending in December 2007.

Rejoining Workforce

While some of the drop in participation comes from the retirement of Baby Boomers, a “significant amount” is due to labor market slack, Yellen said on March 31. “Some of these workers may rejoin the labor force in a stronger economy,” she said.

Girard disagreed. “In 2012 and 2013, the bulk of the labor force exits were retirements,” she said. “We’re highly skeptical that these individuals will be pulled back into the labor market even if economic conditions improve.”

“I’m not saying there is no slack” in the labor market, Girard added. “My concern is that some of these measures may not reflect the amount of slack the Fed thinks they do.”

Warning: It’s Confirmed….NSA Conducts Warrantless Searches On Americans

It’s time to put an end to this insanity. After spending hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayers money on this idiotic program, what does NSA have to show for it? That’s right, they have cough some retarded taxi-driver-terrorist-wanna-be and they have compiled a detailed profile on how much porn every American watches. That’s about it.

“What this is,” Wyden said, “is this allows the government to look at the emails of law-abiding Americans. That needs to be fixed. And then, I believe strongly we ought to ban all dragnet surveillance on law-abiding Americans; not just phone records, but also medical records, purchases and others.”

“What the government has been doing is running a federal human relations database,” Wyden alleged. “When the government has the information about who you called, when you called, they know a lot about your private life.”

Outrageous. When did American citizens become such pussies? I don’t know about you but I would rather fucking die from a terrorist attack than to be constantly spied on by my own government under the pretense of “safety”.  It’s time to destroy NSA. This organization has no place in our society. I don’t want to be spied on, do you? (Read full story/report below). 

nsa warrantless searches investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Warning: It’s Confirmed….NSA Conducts Warrantless Searches On Americans  Google

RT Writes: Confirmed: NSA conducts warrantless searches on Americans

United States intelligence officials have been scouring the personal communications of innocent Americans, the nation’s top spy chief now acknowledges, using a procedure that’s allegedly lawful and constitutionally sound.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper admitted as much in a letter sent last week to US Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), who two months ago was promised an answer by the DNI during a heated discussion on the floor of Congress about what the National Security Agency can and cannot do.

The debate between Wyden and the country’s top intelligence officer began much earlier than that, though, and Clapper’s latest acknowledgement comes nine months after the NSA insisted Americans needn’t worry about being targeted by the US government’s vast surveillance apparatus.

Since the George W. Bush administration, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act has provided the American government with the ability to collect communications sent to or from any non US-persons located abroad, and Sen. Wyden has been one of the most adamant critics of that authority since even before the first Snowden leaks surfaced last June. Practically one year before the NSA leaker became a household name, in fact, Sen. Wyden asked the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community for details on how many Americans have been targeted by the NSA since Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act was approved in 2008 and the NSA began to sweep up the online and over-the-phone activities of Americans engaged in conversation with persons located outside of the country.

“If no one will even estimate how many Americans have had their communications collected under this law then it is all the more important that Congress act to close the ‘back door searches’ loophole, to keep the government from searching for Americans’ phone calls and emails without a warrant,” Wyden told Wired’s Danger Room back in June 2012.

When the first Snowden leaks began one year to the month later, the NSA issued a “fact sheet” that said Section 702 authority “allows only the targeting, for foreign intelligence purposes, of communications of foreign persons who are located abroad.”

The government may not target any US person anywhere in the world under this authority, nor may it target a person outside of the US if the purpose is to acquire information from a particular, known person inside the US,” the memorandum continued.

Even then, however, Wyden wasn’t satisfied. “We were disappointed to see that this fact sheet contains an inaccurate statement about how the Section 702 authority has been interpreted by the US government,” hewrote in a joint letter to then-NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander sent last June along with the signature of Sen. Mark Udall. “In our judgment this inaccuracy is significant, as it portrays protections for Americans’ privacy as being significantly stronger than they actually are.”

As the NSA leaks continued to drip, last August Mr. Snowden supplied The Guardian newspaper with cold hard proof that reaffirmed Sen. Wyden’s worries.

The National Security Agency has a secret backdoor into its vast databases under a legal authority enabling it to search for US citizens’ email and phone calls without a warrant,” journalists James Ball and Spencer Ackerman wrote for the paper last August after seeing a secret NSA document supplied to them by Snowden.

When Clapper testified before Congress earlier this year, Wyden once more insisted on getting a straight answer out of the intelligence community’s top officer. During a January 29 intelligence hearing on worldwide threats, Wyden asked Clapper if the NSA has ever conducted “warrantless searches” on the information contained in those databases by using “specific” Americans’ identifying information to conduct those queries.

At the time, Clapper said he’d prefer not to discuss the matter in the midst of the hearing and would instead issue a declassified answer within 30 days. That official response, albeit delayed, was sent to the senator’s office last Friday, and reaffirmed what Snowden said all along.

Russia To Invade JP Morgan Chase

Russia is pissed. Big time. On Monday JP Morgan Chase stopped a small $5,000 money transfer from the Russian Embassy to  an insurance company associated with a bank on a sanctions list. 

The Russian Foreign Ministry responded with “We consider JPMorgan Chase’s decision to block a transfer from the Russian Embassy in Astana to the SOGAZ insurance company under the pretense of anti-Russian sanctions introduced by the U.S. in response to the reunification of Crimea with Russia to be absolutely unacceptable, illegal, and absurd. The US needs to understand that any hostile actions against a Russian diplomatic mission are not only a highly egregious violation of international law, but open the door to retaliation that will inevitably affect the work of the U.S. Embassy and consulates in Russia.”

Putin was seen throwing a tantrum as he was trying to decide on his two options. To invade Ukraine or to send his elite special forces to take over JPM Chase headquarters. So, did JP Morgan Chase unassumingly start the next phase of this conflict? We are about to find out.  

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Russia To Invade JP Morgan Chase  Google

american needs a major enemy investwithalex
Daily News Reports: Russia Threatens Retaliation Against U.S. Embassy Over JPMorgan Blocking Embassy Payment

Russia’s Overseas Ministry says JPMorgan blocking the payment is “totally unacceptable, unlawful, and absurd.”

The U.S. embassy and consulates in Russia ought to anticipate retaliation just after JPMorgan Chase blocked a payment from the Russian embassy, the state’s International Ministry claimed on Tuesday.

The Russian Overseas Ministry claimed JPMorgan blocked a payment from its embassy in Astana, Kazakhstan to Sogaz, an insurance plan corporation partially owned by Lender Rossiya, the sole Russian economical establishment sanctioned by the U.S.

“We take into account JPMorgan Chase’s final decision to block a transfer from the Russian Embassy in Astana to the SOGAZ insurance policy enterprise under the pretense of anti-Russian sanctions introduced by the U.S. in response to the reunification of Crimea with Russia to be unquestionably unacceptable, unlawful, and absurd,” the International Ministry .

The lender detected the payment and suspended it for the reason that of Sogaz’s connection to Financial institution Rossiya, a man or woman familiar with the matter explained. The payment was for less than $5,000, the particular person reported.

When , a senior administration official explained it to BuzzFeed as a “crony bank.”

The St. Petersburg-centered lender is greatly invested in gasoline assets owned by the point out and the Treasury explained it was “the personal bank for senior officials of the Russian Federation.” A different senior administration formal mentioned when the sanctions were declared that the U.S. would “avert it from working to the finest extent attainable.”

The Overseas Ministry claimed that the U.S. “needs to understand that any hostile steps from a Russian diplomatic mission are not only a highly egregious violation of worldwide legislation, but open up the door to retaliation that will inevitably affect the get the job done of the U.S. Embassy and consulates in Russia.”

Past week, Bank Rossiya and only doing organization in rubles.

On Friday, a Lender Rossiya subsidiary, Abros, back again to the company, using its over-all ownership down to forty eight.52% from fifty one.fifty two%.

“As with all US monetary institutions that function globally, we are subject matter to certain regulatory prerequisites. We will carry on to seek assistance from the U.S. govt on implementing their modern sanctions,” JPMorgan reported in a assertion.

Stock Market Update. April 1st, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com

daily chart April 1st, 2014

Another strong day for the markets with the Dow Jones up 75 points (0.46%) and the Nasdaq up 69 points (1.64%).

Today marked an important juncture. Just as forecasted on this blog last Friday, the Nasdaq ended up bouncing (quite strongly) from it’s oversold bottom. Yet, despite the S&P hitting an all time high and the DOW stopping just 24 points shy of an all time high, this doesn’t tell the whole story. For instance, all markets left a number of large gaps on the downside that they must go back and close over the next few days. Indicating upcoming downside. 

Plus, there is a small matter of the bear market of 2014-2017 that should start within a relatively short period of time. The bottom line is, it would pay to be very conservative here. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and it’s internal bear market composition, please Click Here. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

Stock Market Update. April 1st, 2014. InvestWithAlex.com Google

 

What You Ought To Know About The IRS Monster Coming After You

America is going to hell. Now you can’t even launder your dirty money at the Casino. BVI, Switzerland, Hong Kong and now even our Casinos are under attack by the FED’s and the IRS. The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, is considering implementing new regulations within the current law, which already requires casinos to report any suspicious activity. The move is aimed at stopping criminals from using casinos for money laundering.

I don’t think so. The move is designed to continue the policy of cementing financial controls over the populous by the Federal Government. Fairly soon, the government will have the ability to know exactly how much you have and where. And it wouldn’t matter if you live/work in Los Angeles or Timbuktu. While they already have certain systems in place, the noose continues to tighten. Fairly soon, outside of hiding stacks of cash under your pillow or carrying bricks of gold in you pockets, you won’t be able to get away from this “financial surveillance”.   While most people would believe that this is not a concern, it is. Essentially, your financial freedom vanishes when the government has the ability to freeze/control/access/monitor ALL of your accounts on a whim. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

What You Ought To Know About IRS Monster Coming After You  Google

IRS Monster

Fox News Reports: Feds may enlist casinos to vet high-rollers’ funds

The feds want to know who is cashing in their chips, and they want help from casinos.

The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, is considering implementing new regulations within the current law, which already requires casinos to report any suspicious activity, according to a report fromReuters. The move is aimed at stopping criminals from using casinos for money laundering. If implemented, the new rule will most likely require casinos to gather more information on certain customers and better understand the source of high-risk transactions, such as international wire transfers and massive cash deposits.

“I fear there may be a culture within some pockets of the industry of reluctant compliance with the bare minimum, if not less,” FinCEN Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery said last fall at the Global Gaming Expo. “I hope that together we can make a cultural change.”

“I fear there may be a culture within some pockets of the industry of reluctant compliance with the bare minimum, if not less.”

– Jennifer Shasky Calvery, Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Reuters reported that FinCEN is currently investigating possible lapses in compliance at several Las Vegas casinos. Last August, the Las Vegas Sands Corp. agreed to pay the Justice Department more than $47 million for admitted anti-money laundering lapses at its Venetian and Palazzo hotels in the Nevada gambling mecca.

Officials for FinCEN declined comment when reached by FoxNews.com but referred to Calvery’s statements at the expo last September.

“When some casinos say that they are in the gaming business and not really in the business of providing financial services, I get the impression that they are saying that they should not have as much responsibility in the AML context as those financial institutions whose business it is to receive, move and protect money,” Calvery said. “And when some casinos say that probing their customers about their activities outside of the casino will drive customers away, I sense that they feel that it is not their responsibility to protect their institutions, and our financial system as a whole, from being used by illicit actors.”

American Gaming Association President and CEO Geoff Freeman said the industry advocacy group will work with the Treasury Department.

“We are developing a strong partnership with FinCEN that enables achievement of our shared goal to protect the integrity of gaming,” he said in a statement to FoxNews.com. “It is important that the millions of law-abiding customers who frequent our properties every day can continue to receive a world-class entertainment experience while we uphold our commitment to a culture of compliance.”

The End Of Bitcoin?

Bitcoin just can’t catch a break lately. With recent price collapse, Mt. Gox failure and bankruptcy, Chinese controls and the recent IRS ruling, Bitcoin has more twists and turns than a Mexican Telenovela. That has been my biggest problem with the Bitcoin since the start. No one on this earth can accurately predict where Bitcoin will be 2 years from now. It might be at $1 or at $1 Million. As such, Bitcoin is nothing more than a highly speculative asset. 

Further, I believe that recent IRS ruling classifying Bitcoin as an asset as opposed to a currency is the biggest death blow that no one is talking about. Just imagine buying a chocolate bar with Bitcoin and trying to figure out your capital gain/loss in the transaction. I fathom most people will give up after the first try. Whatever the future is, when it comes to Bitcoin, it is impossible to predict. That is precisely why I continue to maintain that most people should stay away from the currency. If you do want to make money from Bitcoin, this would a much better way. Click Here.    

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

The End Of Bitcoin? Google the end of bitcoin investwithalex

Talking Numbers Writes: This could be the end of the Bitcoin era

Bitcoin may be thought of as an alternative currency – but just don’t say that to the IRS.

The US Internal Revenue Service says that Bitcoin is property, not currency. That means profits in Bitcoin get taxed at the lower capital gains rate rather than income rate. But, it also means that losses in Bitcoin are also at the capital gains tax rate. That helped Bitcoin’s value to drop 20% in just the past week.

CNBC contributor Gina Sanchez, founder of Chantico Global, this is yet another bad headline in a long stream of bad news.

“It’s a terrible thing,” says Sanchez of Bitcoin’s IRS categorization. “This is already a really negative story, in my opinion. What this says is every time you make a transaction, you basically have to keep track of your capital gains – every transaction.”

In general, Sanchez sees no reason for investors to trade their dollars for Bitcoin. “Bitcoin as a currency doesn’t make any sense,” she says. “You basically have a whole bunch of cyber geeks trying to tout themselves as a monetary authority. That’s just not going to fly.”

Talking Numbers contributor Richard Ross, Global Technical Strategist at Auerbach Grayson, was once fairly bullish on the future of Bitcoin. But, after a few scandals – from the MtGox collaps to the arrest of BitInstant founder Charlie Shrem – and a huge drop in value, Ross is now very bearish. 

“It hasn’t completely collapsed – yet,” says Ross. “This has transitioned from a trade into a scandal, which is like a duck transitioning to a l’orange; it’s not a good thing.”

Ross sees Bitcoin trading in a descending triangle with a base at the $500 level. Given that its peak was around $1,100, the triangle would project a downside of equal magnitude in the opposite direction. In this case, that would be negative $100.

“Now, that doesn’t really make sense,” says Ross. “But, given the recent history – given the MtGox scandal – I could see this thing at negative. It could actually cost you money to own this thing at the end of the day. It could just disappear that quickly.” 

“I don’t know what good could really come of it at this point.”

Warning: Facebook’s #2 Sells Half Her Shares. Time To Short?

According to recent regulatory fillings, Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s COO and an official #2, sold over half her stake in the company. A number of “fundamental” reasons were given, but as the saying goes, money talks and bullshit walks. 

So, the question is…..is it time to sell or even short Facebook? 

It is. First, Facebook is highly speculative and overpriced. It’s valuation is nowhere near reasonable (even if massive growth materializes) and I believe that today’s price is indicative of a speculative bubble within it’s shares. In addition, Facebook left a large gap around $25 in July of 2013 that it must close before any sustained rally in it’s share price can take place. Finally, as per our mathematical and timing work, the bear market of 2014-2017 is nearly here. When it starts, most speculative issues, such as Facebook will decline at X multiple to the overall market. Forecasting a large, 50-60% drop in its share price over the next 2 years.

Once you find a good entry point, it would make a lot of sense to go short here. One thing is for sure, I wouldn’t be holding any shares long. If you would be interested in learning when the bear market of 2014-2017 starts (to the day) and it’s internal composition, please Click Here. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

Warning: Facebook’s #2 Sells Half Her Shares. Time To Short?  Google facebook's #2 sells half her shares investwithalex

FT Writes: Sheryl Sandberg slashes Facebook holdings

Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s number two executive, has shed more than half her stake in the social networking company since its initial public offering less than two years ago, according to an analysis of recent regulatory filings.

The series of disposals, some of which were made to satisfy tax bills, are likely to add to persistent questions about whether Ms Sandberg is eyeing an eventual departure from the company for a future in government or as head of another large company.

However, her name has yet to be closely linked to any senior corporate positions and she has denied any plans to compete for political office – most recently in January, when she said that politics was “not for me”.

Also, even after the disposals, Ms Sandberg’s stake worth about $1bn still makes her one of the largest individual investors in Facebook with a 0.5 per cent stake.

As chief operating officer, the former Google executive was brought in at a critical time in Facebook’s development, when the company was first looking to ramp up its revenues and a young Mark Zuckerberg was still trying to find his feet.

The Facebook chief executive has since developed a greater management self-assurance and taken on many of the company’s key decisions, for instance in his personal handling of deals such as the acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram.

Ms Sandberg has frequently been talked of as a candidate for high office in Washington. A former chief of staff to Larry Summers at the time he was treasury secretary under Bill Clinton, she was said to have been considered for that position during the first Obama administration.

Ms Sandberg has sold about 10m shares worth some $400m since Facebook made its stock market debut in May 2012, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The sales were made under the “blind” trading plans that corporate executives use to spread their disposals out over a period of time, reducing the risk of being accused of trading on privileged information.

She also sold nearly 16m shares in late 2012 to settle a tax bill that fell due when restricted stock she had in the company vested to become ordinary shares.

Along with a number of other small disposals, that has taken Ms Sandberg’s overall stake down to 17.2m shares, restricted stock units and options in the social networking company. At the time of the IPO, she held about 41m shares, most of them in the form of restricted stock units.

facebook's #2 sells half her shares investwithalex